Delhi High Court
96,004 judgments
Ponty Singh v. Anu Singh Bhatia
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal, holding that having submitted to Singapore court jurisdiction, he cannot seek anti-suit injunction in India restraining foreign divorce proceedings on forum non-conveniens grounds.
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS v. MAHENDRA SINGH
The Delhi High Court held that acquittal in a criminal trial does not conclusively establish suitability for police recruitment, affirming the Screening Committee's authority to deny appointment based on the nature of acquittal and character verification.
Navratan Baid v. Neetu Baid
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted divorce on grounds of cruelty, emphasizing equal treatment of spouses regarding infidelity and mental cruelty and recognizing irretrievable breakdown of marriage.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of seniority-related provisions in the Civil Services Examination Rules and IPS Rules while invalidating administrative letters imposing extra conditions, affirming that exempted probationers cannot suffer seniority loss and retrospective amendments must not prejudice vested rights.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of amendments regulating seniority and attempts in the Civil Services Examination for IPS officers, struck down unauthorized conditions imposed by cadre authorities, and validated retrospective amendments aligning with Supreme Court rulings.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of restrictions on seniority and examination attempts for IPS officers under the Civil Services Examination Rules, struck down unauthorized government letters imposing additional conditions, and validated retrospective amendments to seniority rules consistent with Supreme Court and CAT rulings.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of certain Civil Services Examination Rules regulating attempts and seniority while invalidating administrative letters imposing additional conditions, clarifying the law on probationary training and seniority of IPS officers.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of service rules restricting seniority and attempts in civil services examinations, dismissed challenges to retrospective amendments affecting IPS officers' seniority, and struck down unauthorized conditions imposed by cadre authorities.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of key Civil Services Examination rules regulating probationary training and seniority while striking down unauthorized conditions imposed by government letters and clarifying the limits of retrospective amendments affecting IPS officers' seniority.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of seniority-related amendments to Civil Services Examination Rules and IPS seniority rules while striking down unauthorized conditions imposed by government letters, affirming the balance between executive rule-making and protection of service rights.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of seniority and eligibility rules for IPS officers postponing training to appear in subsequent Civil Services Examinations, struck down unauthorized conditions imposed by authorities, and affirmed retrospective amendments aligning seniority with judicial decisions.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Court upheld the validity of restrictions on civil service candidates seeking to improve their career prospects through subsequent examinations but struck down administrative orders imposing additional conditions beyond the rules and emphasized protection of seniority rights under statutory provisions.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of key provisions regulating seniority and attempts in the Civil Services Examination Rules while invalidating unauthorized embargoes imposed by cadre authorities, affirming the reasonableness of classification between Group 'A' and 'B' services and the limits of retrospective amendments.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of restrictions on Civil Services Examination attempts and seniority rules while invalidating unauthorized administrative conditions, affirming the Central Government's rule-making powers and consistent seniority fixation.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Court upheld the validity of service rule amendments regulating seniority and examination attempts while invalidating letters imposing additional conditions beyond the rules, dismissing challenges to retrospective amendments and seniority lists.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of amendments regulating seniority and eligibility in Civil Services Examination rules while invalidating unauthorized administrative conditions and dismissing challenges to seniority lists as barred by limitation.
Zamrudpur Welfare Association v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed restoration of road widths and authentication of layout plans in Zamrudpur, highlighting failures in municipal governance and ordering coordinated administrative action to resolve encroachments and traffic issues.
Lt. Col. Archana Shukla v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the Supreme Court's 60% benchmark for Permanent Commission and dismissed petitions seeking stay of release of women officers assessed under the UAC appraisal system.
Delhi Development Authority v. Ram Avtar Sharma
The Delhi High Court held that ACRs lacking Counter Signing Officer's overall grading are not necessarily incomplete and that final appraisal must consider qualitative weightage, setting aside the Tribunal's direction for a review DPC and dismissing the respondent's OA.
Krishan Gopal Bakshi v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking allotment of a flat under the closed NPRS-79 scheme due to delay and laches, holding that no mandamus can be issued after scheme closure and inordinate delay.