Delhi High Court

96,004 judgments

Year:

Chief Secretary, Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Satish Kumar & Ors.

09 Aug 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; V. Kameswar Rao · 2013:DHC:5628-DB

The Delhi High Court held that contract appointed Craft Instructors are entitled to basic pay plus certain allowances but not increments or leave benefits, directed application of last come first go principle in future disengagements, and required the Government to consider applicability of the Maternity Benefits Act.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant contract employees Craft Instructors last come first go allowances

Chief Secretary, Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Satish Kumar & Ors.

09 Aug 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; V. Kameswar Rao · 2013:DHC:5629-DB

The Delhi High Court held that contract-appointed Craft Instructors are entitled to basic pay, grade pay, DA, HRA, and transport allowance but not full leave benefits, and directed application of the 'last come first go' principle in future terminations.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant contract employees Craft Instructors allowances last come first go

Union of India v. Anand Mohan Sharan

26 Jul 2012 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:7900-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 22

The Delhi High Court held that the Disciplinary Authority's order remitting a disciplinary matter for fresh inquiry without proper reasons and in violation of procedural rules was unsustainable and set aside the order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969 Disciplinary Authority Inquiry Officer Central Vigilance Commission

Hindustan Zinc Ltd v. Durha Construction Pvt Ltd

17 Jul 2012 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2021:DHC:697

The Delhi High Court upheld striking off the appellant's defence for wilful non-compliance with a discovery order under Order 11 Rule 12 CPC, emphasizing the obligation to produce relevant documents and the consequences of contumacious conduct.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant discovery order Order 11 Rule 12 CPC Order 11 Rule 21 CPC striking off defence

Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate v. STATE .....

06 Jul 2012 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG; HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE M... · 2014:DHC:6269-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Janardhan Gupta for attempted rape of his mentally disabled sister-in-law, holding that credible eyewitness testimony and circumstances established the offence despite absence of medical injuries.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant attempted rape medical evidence mental disability credibility of witness

Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate v. STATE .....

06 Jul 2012 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG; HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE M... · 2014:DHC:6268-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Janardhan Gupta for attempted rape of a mentally disabled minor, affirming that credible witness testimony and circumstantial evidence suffice to prove the offence despite absence of physical injuries or semen.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant attempted rape medical examination mental disability forensic evidence

Cpl Gaurav Badhwar v. Union of India & Ors.

18 May 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:1454-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that denial of discharge on grounds of trade criticality is arbitrary when objective evidence shows the trade is redundant and personnel are assigned non-technical duties, directing the Air Force to grant discharge to Cpl. Gaurav Badhwar.

service_law petition_allowed Significant criticality of trade discharge from armed forces instrument fitter trade modernization of armed forces

S. L. Saini v. Gyanender Bharti & Ors.

17 May 2012 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:2261

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against the Delhi Jal Board and GNCTD, holding that no wilful disobedience occurred as the land acquisition process under the 2013 LA Act is underway in accordance with law.

administrative petition_dismissed contempt of court land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 wilful disobedience

Krishna Kumari v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

09 May 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; V. Kameswar Rao · 2013:DHC:6337-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a senior teacher entitled to retrospective appointment and pay fixation must have her pay stepped up to match juniors receiving ACP/MACP benefits, setting aside the tribunal’s denial and cost imposition.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme pay anomaly seniority

Deepak Verma v. Union of India & Ors.

01 May 2012 · Sanjiv Khanna; Navin Chawla · 2017:DHC:6388-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 11

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of an Officer Cadet's reinstatement request as time barred and affirmed that a resignation accepted by the competent military authority is final and cannot be withdrawn.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant resignation reinstatement Officers Training Academy military training

Shail Attrey v. Govt of India and Ors.

27 Apr 2012 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:891-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order fixing pay of a retired Army officer absorbed in DRDO, holding that personal pay can substitute rank pay within the civilian pay scale to avoid pecuniary loss.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant pay fixation rank pay personal pay Central Administrative Tribunal

Union of India v. M/S Vishva Shanti Builders (India) Pvt Ltd

27 Apr 2012 · Jasmeet Singh · 2024:DHC:5467
Cites 2 · Cited by 5

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award allowing contractor claims despite a No Claim Certificate signed under protest, emphasizing limited grounds for setting aside awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 No Claim Certificate Arbitrability of claims

Reliance Communications Limited v. Unique Identification Authority of India

20 Apr 2012 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5172
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award interpreting contract billing terms as payment based on aggregate call duration divided by 60 seconds and affirmed the arbitrator's power to remand SLA deduction issues for reconsideration after natural justice violations.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge contract interpretation connect minutes

Sant Lal v. State

15 Apr 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:3638-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Sant Lal for murdering his maternal uncle based on consistent circumstantial evidence, proper proof of post-mortem report, and call detail records, dismissing his appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder Section 302 IPC circumstantial evidence post-mortem report

Ravi Kumar Meena v. State

11 Apr 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:5108-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Ravi Kumar Meena for culpable homicide not amounting to murder, ruling the stabbing was unpremeditated and occurred in the heat of the moment.

criminal appeal_dismissed culpable homicide not amounting to murder Section 304 IPC intent to kill premeditation

Ravi Kumar Meena v. State

11 Apr 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:5102-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder where a fatal stabbing occurred in a sudden quarrel without premeditation, rejecting the State's claim of murder.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant culpable homicide not amounting to murder Section 304 Part I IPC Section 302 IPC stabbing

Pappu Singh @ Raju v. State

10 Apr 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:3636-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the life imprisonment sentence for a married man convicted of repeatedly raping a minor girl, rejecting the claim that the sentence was harsh or disproportionate.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 376 IPC rape of minor life imprisonment DNA evidence

HAV Dadaso Sampatrao Phadtare v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Mar 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:618-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s order directing retrospective promotions before repatriation from MES to Indian Army but rejected the claim to remain in MES until parity in rank with juniors is achieved.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Military Engineering Service Indian Army cadre merger promotion

HAV Dadaso Sampatrao Phadtare v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Mar 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:619-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order directing retrospective promotions before repatriation from MES to Indian Army but rejected the claim to remain in MES until promotions are earned, emphasizing protection of seniority without indefinite delay of merger.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Military Engineering Service Indian Army promotion seniority

HAV Dadaso Sampatrao Phadtare v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Mar 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:615-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s directions that personnel repatriated from MES to the Indian Army must be promoted retrospectively if eligible but cannot delay repatriation pending promotions, ensuring protection of seniority without indefinite retention in MES.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Military Engineering Service Indian Army merger of cadre promotion