Delhi High Court
95,375 judgments
Dilip Kumar Pandey v. UOI
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a CRPF constable for misconduct involving intoxication on duty and threatening a superior officer with a cocked rifle, affirming that courts will not interfere with disciplinary findings supported by some evidence.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-8 v. Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision that royalty payments made by Samsung India Electronics to its parent for technological know-how were at arm's length and not subject to transfer pricing adjustments, rejecting the Revenue's claim that the payments were to itself as a contract manufacturer.
SH.PREM NATH CHOPRA DECEASED THRU LRS v. SH.ARUN CHOPRA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the mutation and wills relating to a Defence Colony property, holding the will of Sham Lal Chopra genuine and the plaintiff's challenge barred by limitation.
Mukesh Kapil v. Parag P Tripathi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld a consent decree based on a settlement agreement in a property redevelopment dispute, dismissing challenges alleging fraud and invalidity, and clarified that agreements to sell do not transfer ownership until registered sale deeds are executed.
Mukesh Kapil v. Parag P Tripathi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld a consent decree based on a settlement agreement in a property redevelopment dispute, rejecting challenges of fraud and invalidity and directing execution of sale deeds as per agreed terms.
Mukesh Kapil v. Parag P Tripathi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld a consent decree based on a settlement agreement in a property redevelopment dispute, holding that agreements to sell do not create interest in property until registered sale deeds are executed and dismissing challenges based on alleged fraud and breach.
Messer Griesheim GmbH v. Goyal MG Gases Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held it has jurisdiction to execute a foreign money decree under Section 44A CPC, dismissed all objections to the foreign English judgment, and allowed enforcement against the Judgment Debtor.
Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner v. Hi-Tech Vocational Training Centre
The Delhi High Court held that the Provident Fund Commissioner has discretion to levy damages under Section 14B and that payment of dues before proceedings does not bar initiation of penalty proceedings.
Vikram Singh & Anr. v. Ajit Inder Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld a family settlement memorandum as valid and binding, dismissing claims of coercion and confirming equal partition of property despite a prior will.
Ram Phal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that pre-2006 pensioners are entitled to pension fixation as per the 6th CPC recommendations without arbitrary cut-off restrictions, quashing the denial of upgradation benefits and directing revision with arrears.
SI (GD) Hanumant Singh Shekhawat v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that CRPF Sub-Inspectors are entitled to pay fixation at Rs. 10,230 plus grade pay of Rs. 4,200 under the ACP Scheme by applying the 1.86 multiplier, directing respondents to grant consequential benefits.
Rani Singh v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a police officer absconding after criminal charges, ruling that family pension is not payable despite presumed death after seven years, as dismissal without enquiry was valid and pension rights forfeited.
KTM-AG v. Honda Motorcycles and Scooter India Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the trademark dispute petition as settled and directed cancellation of the "DUKE" trademark registration in accordance with the parties' Settlement Agreement.
Romi Sharma v. Secretary Labour
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that res judicata bars fresh writ petitions on disciplinary dismissal under the Industrial Disputes Act and that the Government's refusal to grant prosecution sanction was lawful and not arbitrary.
Mr. Chatanya Siddhartha, Advocate. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act once possession is taken and compensation paid, dismissing stale claims of continued possession by landowners.
Manoj Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for murder of an accused who fired indiscriminately into a crowd, holding that such act amounts to murder under clause fourthly of Section 300 IPC despite absence of premeditation or specific intent to kill.
Babloo & Pappu v. The State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court reduced the appellant’s conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, maintaining other convictions and adjusting the sentence to time already served.
Omkar Singh v. Union of India; Braham Prakash Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside compulsory retirement penalties imposed on force personnel for failing to intervene in a sudden assault, holding that disciplinary authorities must consider all relevant circumstances including natural human reactions before imposing punishment.
Omkar Singh v. Union of India; Braham Prakash Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside compulsory retirement penalties imposed on force personnel for failing to intervene in a sudden assault, holding that absence of reasonable opportunity to react negates misconduct.
Ram Kawar HUF v. M/S SMC GLOBAL SECURITIES LIMITED
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to summon irrelevant documents under Section 91 Cr.P.C. in a Section 138 NI Act complaint, emphasizing that such power cannot be used for fishing expeditions or to delay trial.