Delhi High Court

95,375 judgments

Year:

Ashok Sikka v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

28 Oct 2009 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2022:DHC:1747

The High Court dismissed the appeal holding the suit challenging demolition by SDMC officials barred by six-month limitation under Section 478 of the Delhi Municipal Act, 1957, as the demolition was done in discharge of official duties pursuant to court orders.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Municipal Act, 1957 Section 478 limitation Order VII Rule 11 CPC demolition

Nitin Kumar v. M/S Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd

26 Oct 2009 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:1622

The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal holding that gratuity is payable only after five years of continuous service under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and the suit claiming gratuity after two years’ service was barred by limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 4(1) gratuity entitlement limitation period

Ajay Bharti @ Pandit v. State

22 Oct 2009 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4961-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction of the appellant for throwing acid causing fatal burns and death by sepsis, relying on a reliable dying declaration and corroborative medical evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant acid attack dying declaration Section 302 IPC sepsis

Bry-Air Prokon SAGL & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.

13 Oct 2009 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:4439
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Delhi High Court allowed restoration of six patent applications and a lapsed patent due to negligence of the Patent Agent, holding that courts may condone delay in extraordinary circumstances under writ jurisdiction despite mandatory statutory timelines.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant patent abandonment First Examination Report FER patent restoration

Shakti Nath and Ors. v. Alpha Tiger Cyprus Investments No. 3 Ltd and Ors.

10 Oct 2009 · S. Muralidhar · 2017:DHC:775
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an ICC arbitration award dismissing challenges to arbitrator appointments as time-barred and affirmed the award as a valid claim for damages, not an enforcement of put option rights violating FEMA.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ICC Rules challenge to arbitrator Section 34 petition

Hemant Tyagi v. UCO Bank & Ors.

05 Oct 2009 · C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:6283

The Delhi High Court held that a public sector bank cannot enforce bond money against an employee who left service to join another government organization without obtaining a fresh bond, and directed refund of the bond amount paid.

administrative petition_allowed Significant bond enforcement public sector enterprises Department of Public Enterprises Office Memorandum refund of bond money

Aakash Deep v. Union of India & Anr.

16 Sep 2009 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:1596-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the appellant had exceeded the permissible deputation tenure and was ineligible for appointment without serving the mandatory cooling-off period, validating the withdrawal of his appointment by DERC.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant deputation tenure Central Staffing Scheme training period proper channel

Vivek Kaushik v. Vikram Kaushik & Anr

03 Sep 2009 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Yogesh Khanna · 2017:DHC:270-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant failed to prove an oral family settlement and ownership rights over disputed properties, affirming that clear evidence is essential to establish such settlements.

property appeal_dismissed Significant oral family settlement partition property ownership intestate succession

Nitesh Kumar Singh; Laavanya Kaushik; Mohnish Sehrawat v. Babu Lal Meena

04 Aug 2009 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:688-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's condonation of delay in filing an OA for non-declaration of ST category results, holding that limitation did not commence as the cause of action persisted.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay limitation Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Scheduled Tribe vacancies

Nain Singh v. UOI & Anr.

21 Jul 2009 · Pradeep Nandrajog; V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:62-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the disciplinary inquiry finding the petitioner guilty of illegal sale of CSD items and misconduct, holding the voluntary confessional statement admissible and the inquiry fair, and dismissed the writ petition challenging the proceedings.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary inquiry confessional statement CSD canteen pilferage government servant misconduct

Dharambir Singh v. M/S Hindustan Unilever Ltd. and Ors.

14 Jul 2009 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:7658-DB

The Delhi High Court correctly held that the Labour Court at Delhi lacked territorial jurisdiction over the termination dispute of an employee posted and terminated at Faridabad.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction Labour Court industrial dispute termination of service

Inderjeet Singh v. Kamala Nehru College & Ors.

11 Jul 2009 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:7079
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that a dissent based on erroneous eligibility criteria cannot invalidate a selection and quashed the direction to re-advertise, directing appointment as per the original merit list.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Selection Committee Assistant Professor appointment UGC Regulations 2018 Eligibility criteria

Managing Committee National Public School v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

01 Jul 2009 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:485-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld that closure of a recognized school requires prior approval with conditions including absorption of surplus employees, affirming a single employer relationship across multiple branches of a private unaided school.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Rule 46 Delhi School Education Rules closure of school absorption of surplus employees

Managing Committee National Public School v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

01 Jul 2009 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:486-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the requirement that closure of a recognized school must be approved with conditions including absorption of surplus employees in other branches, affirming the regulatory authority under the Delhi School Education Act and Rules.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Rule 46 Delhi School Education Rules closure of school absorption of surplus employees

Sudhanshu and Ors v. Union of India and Anr

25 Jun 2009 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:2806-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 109

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' challenge to their exclusion from overseas deployment due to their promotion zone status, upholding the binding executive policy restricting such deployment.

administrative petition_dismissed deployment abroad promotion zone Promotion Cadre Course executive policy

Harji Engineering Works Private Limited v. Punjab and Sind Bank & Anr.

13 Jun 2009 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2022:DHC:2665

The Delhi High Court upheld the valid invocation of bank guarantees within the stipulated claim period under their terms, dismissing the appellant's challenge based on wrongful termination and special equities.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant bank guarantee invocation contract termination defect liability period

GNCTD through Medical Director LNJP Hospital v. Beenu Pawar

03 Jun 2009 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:411-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing regularization of a long-serving casual lab technician despite her diploma being from a non-recognized institution, emphasizing fairness and continuous service over procedural technicalities.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant regularization casual employee Diploma in Medical Laboratory Technology recognition of qualification

Dharmender Choudhary v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

22 May 2009 · I. S. Mehta · 2018:DHC:1904

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of respondents in a criminal trespass case, holding that the dispute was civil in nature and prosecution failed to prove criminal trespass beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant criminal trespass Section 448 IPC benefit of doubt possession dispute

National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd v. V.D. Agro Tech Ltd

14 Apr 2009 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6687

The Delhi High Court held that a Section 34 petitioner cannot introduce additional documents not before the arbitral tribunal to dispute factual findings unless exceptional circumstances exist, reaffirming the limited scope of evidence admissible in challenges to arbitral awards rendered before 30 August 2019.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 34 Arbitration Act additional evidence arbitral award challenge public policy

Punjab National Bank & Ors. v. S K Jain

11 Apr 2009 · C. Hari Shankar; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:9679-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of disciplinary proceedings against a bank officer due to failure to prove relied-upon documents through oral evidence, emphasizing the necessity of fair procedure in departmental inquiries.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings charge sheet list of witnesses proof of documents