Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
M/S. INDO AFGAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE v. KALAWATI DEVI
The Delhi High Court upheld the denial of leave to defend in an eviction petition based on bona fide requirement, holding that the tenant failed to raise a prima facie triable issue under Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act.
M/S. UNITED INDIA INSUANCE CO. LTD v. GURBACHAN SINGH
The Delhi High Court held that only the registered owner of a vehicle can claim compensation for its damages under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and set aside the award granted to a non-owner driver.
P. Senthamil Selvan v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 304A IPC following a settlement involving fair compensation to the deceased's legal heir, emphasizing the Court's role in ensuring just and reasonable compensation before quashing criminal proceedings.
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. DALIP KUMAR GUPTA AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal to frame and decide the issue of vehicle involvement in the accident independently, emphasizing the flexible procedural approach under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act.
Sumit Kumar Verma v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction of Sumit Kumar Verma under the Prevention of Corruption Act due to unreliable and contradictory prosecution evidence and reliance on hearsay.
Narender & Anr v. State
The Delhi High Court modified murder convictions to culpable homicide not amounting to murder and reduced sentences, holding that the killing occurred in a sudden fight without premeditation and that common intention was not proved against one appellant.
Nirmal Tower Building Occupants Welfare Society v. Nirmal Tower Building (Pvt.) Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a long-pending suit for non-prosecution under Order XVII Rules 2 and 3 CPC due to the plaintiff's failure to produce evidence despite multiple opportunities.
National Research Development Corporation v. M/S Industrial Carbon and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitrator's award on disclosure of accounts but set aside the rejection of royalty claims for the period before license termination, directing re-examination with adverse inference against defendants for withholding records.
Vipul Gupta v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions challenging continuation of criminal prosecution invoke criminal jurisdiction, rendering Letters Patent Appeals against their dismissal not maintainable and dismissed the appeals with delay condonation refused.
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA.....
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of company directors for operating an unregistered collective investment scheme in violation of SEBI Act and Regulations, affirming their vicarious liability and continuous offence nature until investor repayment.
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA.....
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of company directors for operating an unregistered collective investment scheme in violation of SEBI Act and Regulations, affirming their vicarious liability and the continuing nature of the offence.
Vipul Gupta v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions challenging continuation of criminal prosecution invoke criminal jurisdiction, rendering Letters Patent Appeals against dismissal of such petitions not maintainable, and dismissed the appeals with delay condonation refused.
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA.....
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of company directors for operating an unregistered collective investment scheme in violation of SEBI Act and Regulations, emphasizing continuous offence and vicarious liability.
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA.....
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of company directors for operating an unregistered collective investment scheme in violation of SEBI Act and Regulations, affirming their vicarious liability and the continuous nature of the offence.
Vipul Gupta v. State
The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions challenging ongoing criminal prosecutions invoke criminal jurisdiction, rendering Letters Patent Appeals against such orders not maintainable and dismissed the appeals with delay condonation refused.
Banwari Lal v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for murder based on a reliable dying declaration recorded by a police officer and corroborative evidence, dismissing the appellant's challenge on procedural and evidentiary grounds.
Sanju @ Sonu v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction under Section 307 IPC due to inconsistent complainant testimony and defective investigation, granting the appellant benefit of doubt.
Rama Gogia v. The Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's applications to set aside the dismissal of her suit for non-prosecution and condone delay, holding that no sufficient cause was shown for non-appearance or delay.
Rajesh Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the suit challenging cancellation of plot allotment was barred by limitation and that the allotment was invalid due to lack of consensus ad idem.
C. Ramesh v. Director, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute
The Delhi High Court held that the Governing Body lacked authority to terminate a non-teaching employee without explicit delegation from the Executive Council, setting aside the termination order.