Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

M/S COIM INDIA PVT LTD v. REXOR INDIA LTD & ORS

30 Jan 2014 · G.S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:584

In a suit for recovery under Order 37 CPC, the Delhi High Court decreed the plaintiff's claim due to the defendants' failure to file or press an application for leave to defend, awarding interest on the decretal amount.

civil appeal_allowed Order 37 CPC summons for judgment leave to defend liquidated demand

Salil Maheshwari v. High Court of Delhi

30 Jan 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; G.P. Mittal · 2014:DHC:587-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that appointments cannot exceed the number of vacancies advertised in judicial service examinations, upholding administrative restrictions due to infrastructure constraints and dismissing claims for appointment beyond advertised posts.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Judicial Service Examination vacancies advertised appointments beyond vacancies Articles 14 and 16

Monica Malik v. Amit Malik

30 Jan 2014 · Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:596

The High Court set aside the Family Court's order closing the petitioner's evidence for a single default in appearance, allowing her to be cross-examined and lead evidence subject to costs.

family appeal_allowed Significant closure of evidence cross-examination family court default in appearance

Manju Sabharwal v. Arun Sabharwal

30 Jan 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:583

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition to transfer divorce cases from Tis Hazari to Saket courts, holding that mere convenience and proximity do not justify transfer under Section 24 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Section 24 CPC transfer of cases personal convenience administrative allocation

Pawan Sahani & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi

30 Jan 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:576

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellants' conviction for attempt to murder and obstruction of police but reduced the sentence from seven to three years considering mitigating factors.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 307 IPC Attempt to murder Obstruction of public servant Modification of sentence

Aspective Vanijya Pvt Ltd and Anr v. Industrial Financial Corporation of India Ltd

30 Jan 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:578

The Delhi High Court held that upon default and valid notice under Section 176 of the Indian Contract Act, a lender may enforce securities including sale of pledged shares without court intervention, and refused interim injunction restraining such sale.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Corporate Loan Agreement Pledge of Shares Section 176 Indian Contract Act Default in Payment

Savita & Ors. v. Sri Ram General Insurance Co. Ltd.

30 Jan 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:581

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying minimum wages for a matriculate and 50% future prospects addition, increasing non-pecuniary damages accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation enhancement minimum wages future prospects

Manish Sareen v. Jaswant Raj Bhardwaj and Ors.

30 Jan 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:580

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking clubbing of suits filed at different times and stages, holding that res judicata principles negate the need for clubbing under Section 24 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Section 24 CPC clubbing of suits res judicata Section 11 CPC

TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. SH. DEV KUMAR PRASAD AND ANR.

30 Jan 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:593
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company’s appeal, holding it liable to pay compensation to an injured employee driver under the Employee’s Compensation Act despite discrepancies in the driver’s license and failure to lead evidence.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 insurance liability driver’s license validity compensation claim

Jai Yodhad v. State

30 Jan 2014 · V.K. Jain · 2014:DHC:582

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 20 NDPS Act, ruling that procedural compliance and credible police evidence suffice even without public witnesses or vehicle logbook production.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 20 NDPS search and seizure public witnesses

Pushpa Sharma v. V.V. Gujral & Ors.

30 Jan 2014 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:575

The Delhi High Court upheld the ejectment of a tenant who sublet premises at a rent exceeding the Rent Act threshold, holding that such subletting removes Rent Act protection and entitles the landlord to possession and mesne profits.

property appeal_dismissed Significant subletting tenancy Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 mesne profits

Ganga Sagar Chaurasia v. Sheela & Ors.

30 Jan 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:591

The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's appeal in a rent recovery suit, holding that ownership claims require documentary proof and that dismissal in default does not bar subsequent suits.

civil appeal_dismissed recovery of rent ownership claim documentary evidence res judicata

Suman Taneja v. Rakesh Taneja and Ors.

30 Jan 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:592

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding that defenses based on benami transactions are barred under the Benami Act and that the appellant failed to prove ownership of the disputed property.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 benami transaction Section 3 Benami Act Section 4(2) Benami Act

K.S.OIL LTD. v. RING INDIA INFOTECH PVT. LTD.

29 Jan 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:562

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that suits relating to immovable property must be filed in courts where the property is situated, and territorial jurisdiction cannot be conferred by agreement or waiver.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 16 CPC territorial jurisdiction immovable property Order 7 Rule 10 CPC

Sehzad @ Nadeem v. State

29 Jan 2014 · S. P. Garg · 2014:DHC:553

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for armed robbery and extortion under Sections 394 and 398 IPC, dismissing the appeal for lack of merit.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 394 IPC Section 398 IPC robbery extortion

SHEEL CHAND INDUSTRIES v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

29 Jan 2014 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; R.V. EASWAR · 2014:DHC:560-DB

The Delhi High Court directed refund of customs duty deposits with interest, holding that limitation under Section 27 cannot bar refund where the CESTAT set aside the demand and CBEC Circular mandates refund within three months.

tax petition_allowed Significant refund of customs duty CESTAT order pre-deposit refund Section 27 Customs Act

Union of India v. Pratima Devi & Ors.

29 Jan 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:561

The Delhi High Court upheld the Railway Claims Tribunal's award of compensation to the widow of a deceased bona fide passenger under the Railways Act, 1989, affirming strict liability of Railways for untoward incidents during train travel.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal strict liability Railways Act 1989 untoward incident

State v. Hasim

29 Jan 2014 · Reva Khetrapal; Pratibha Rani · 2014:DHC:541-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of a man accused of kidnapping and raping a minor girl who had voluntarily performed nikah and consented to live with him as his wife, emphasizing the importance of consent and the prosecution's failure to prove minority conclusively.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant run away marriages consent minor nikah

Rajender Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

29 Jan 2014 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2014:DHC:565

The Delhi High Court held that a conspiracy charge cannot be sustained against a petitioner when co-conspirators are acquitted, setting aside the disciplinary penalty imposed on him.

administrative petition_allowed Significant conspiracy disciplinary proceedings acquittal dereliction of duty

Life Technologies Corporation and Anr. v. ATZ Lab Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

29 Jan 2014 · P. K. Bhasin · 2014:DHC:550

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' interim injunction application in a trademark dispute due to lack of prima facie case, absence of written license, and plaintiffs' delay and acquiescence in defendants' use of disputed marks and domain names.

civil petition_dismissed Significant trademark infringement interim injunction limited license corporate name