Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Parminder Singh & Anr. v. Virender Pal Singh Jolly
The Delhi High Court upheld rejection of a plaint challenging a final ex parte decree on fraud grounds for failure to plead particulars, reinforcing the requirement of detailed pleadings to overcome res judicata and execution bars.
New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Shamim Fatima & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying a multiplier based on the deceased's age and a 50% addition for future prospects, upholding one-third deduction for personal expenses.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Harish Chander Bhatt & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's compensation award based on the claimant's prospective employment despite non-joining, dismissing the insurance company's appeal.
SHIV RATTAN MOHTA v. NATIONAL RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal, upholding the direction to furnish accounts and remitting the royalty and interest claims to the Arbitrator for fresh consideration.
Saheb Mehto and Ors. v. Chaman Singh and Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced the compensation awarded under the Motor Vehicles Act after correctly applying Section 163-A provisions and directed the Insurance Company to pay the enhanced amount with interest.
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD v. ROOP RAM
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal, holding that the driver possessed a valid driving licence at the time of the accident, and thus recovery rights were not granted to the insurer.
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD v. SH. RAVINDER KUMAR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal challenging the validity of the driver's licence and upheld the compensation awarded by the Tribunal in a motor accident claim.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Poonam and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an insurer remains liable to pay third party compensation under a motor vehicle insurance policy despite dishonour of premium cheque and policy cancellation, dismissing the insurer's appeal.
Ramesh Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging medical invalidation from ITBP service, holding that the petitioner was rightly declared unfit after due process and no further review was warranted.
Santosh Kumar v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 25(1B) Arms Act but modified the sentence to the period already served, taking a lenient view for the first-time offender.
NITI WADHAWAN v. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-10
The Delhi High Court upheld block assessment against the appellant, holding that a valid search warrant and panchnama in her name confer jurisdiction under Section 158BC, negating the need for separate notice under Section 158BD.
The State of NCT of Delhi v. Samunder Singh
The Delhi High Court quashed the summoning of police officers as accused without prior sanction under Section 140 of the Delhi Police Act, emphasizing the protection of public servants acting in official capacity.
U.S. Sharma v. Aaren Initiative Outdoor Advertising Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court granted unconditional leave to defend to defendants in a suit under Order XXXVII CPC for recovery of advertisement charges, deleted an unrelated party for lack of privity, and emphasized the plaintiff's duty to disclose all material documents upfront.
FANTECH PTY. LTD. v. ADEPT FANTECH INDIA PVT. & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that defendants' unauthorized use of the registered trademark 'FANTECH' constituted infringement and passing off, granting injunctions and damages to the plaintiff in ex-parte proceedings.
Arun Kumar v. Chairman, Food Corporation of India (Headquarters) and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking correction of date of birth for retirement purposes, holding that unexplained delay and consistent official records in favor of the original date of birth disentitle the petitioner from relief.
Naveen Kumar @ Bawla v. State (NCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellants' conviction for attempt to murder but modified their sentence considering mitigating factors and settlement with the victim.
Naveen Kumar @ Bawla v. State (NCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellants' conviction for attempt to murder but modified their sentence considering mitigating factors and enhanced compensation to the victim.
Ram Singh v. State (Govt. of NCT) Delhi
The Delhi High Court disposed of Ram Singh's criminal appeal by referring to a detailed common judgment delivered in a related criminal appeal, without issuing a separate order.
Bharat v. State
The criminal appeal filed by Bharat was disposed of by referring to a detailed common judgment in a related case, without a separate order.
Sachin Verma @ Ashu v. The State
The appeal in Criminal Appeal No. 1373/2012 was disposed of by the Delhi High Court in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered in another related appeal.