Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Ravi v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition challenging the lawful detention of Anand Rao, holding the Juvenile Justice Board's age determination as conclusive and the detention lawful.
Krishan Lal Dilawari v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against probate court’s rejection of a Will due to absence of original Will, suspicious circumstances, and lack of credible evidence, affirming strict proof requirements for probate under the Indian Succession Act.
Mahender Kumar Garg v. Harish Nagpal
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of restoration applications and appeals in a landlord-tenant dispute where the tenant failed to comply with court orders and admitted rent above the rent control threshold, dismissing the appeal with costs.
Smt. Babi Kunvar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of a false claim petition for statutory compensation for death on railway property and initiated proceedings under Section 340 Cr.P.C. for filing a dishonest claim.
M D, PANBAS v. NEELAM & ORS
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by adding 50% for future prospects for a deceased driver below 40 years, rejecting the appellant's plea of exemption due to lack of commercial license.
Minakshi Arora v. Umesh Kumar Batra
The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of a monthly tenancy by legal notice and service of summons under amended Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, dismissing the tenant's second appeal against possession decree.
M D, PANBAS v. Reshma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's challenge to negligence and age evidence but enhanced the motor accident compensation by adding future prospects and increasing non-pecuniary damages.
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. SH PRAVEEN KUMAR AGGARWAL
The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident claim Tribunal's award granting compensation for serious injuries despite delay in filing the claim, emphasizing entitlement based on medical evidence.
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Kamlesh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by increasing deduction towards personal expenses to 50%, adding 50% for future prospects for a 34-year-old deceased, and raising non-pecuniary damages awarded to the claimant.
Rakesh and Anr. v. National Ins Co Ltd and Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a fatal accident claim by applying 50% future prospects addition, increasing the multiplier to 18 based on the deceased's age, and awarding higher non-pecuniary damages.
Rajbir Singh and Anr v. National Ins Co Ltd and Ors
Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying correct future prospects addition and multiplier based on the deceased's age, emphasizing proper proof of income and just non-pecuniary damages.
Ashok Kumar & Anr. v. Sunil Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, affirming bona fide need and absence of alternate accommodation despite tenant objections.
Ashok Kumar & Anr. v. Sunil Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act on the ground of bona fide need of the landlord, rejecting tenants' claims of alternate accommodation and ownership disputes.
Pawan v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants charged under Sections 411 and 412 IPC due to failure of prosecution to prove that the recovered rice was the same as the stolen rice, creating reasonable doubt on identity of stolen property.
Pawan v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants charged under Sections 411 and 412 IPC due to failure of prosecution to prove that the recovered rice was the same stolen rice, creating reasonable doubt on identity and knowledge of stolen property.
Tejbir Singh v. Rawel Kaur
The Delhi High Court dismissed an application to implead a third party claiming independent title in a suit for specific performance, holding that only parties to the contract are necessary or proper parties in such suits.
Sonu @ Attey v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Sonu @ Attey for causing dangerous injuries with a knife under Section 307 IPC, dismissing his appeal but modifying the sentence to the period already served.
Abdul Hamid v. State
The Delhi High Court delivered a judgment in criminal appeal CRL.A.4/2000 involving appellant Abdul Hamid and the State on April 2, 2014, referring to an order in CRL.A.694/1999.
Suraj v. NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant’s conviction under Section 326 IPC for acid attack but reduced the sentence considering mitigating factors and lack of evidence supporting grave provocation.