Delhi High Court
92,849 judgments
Debratha Guha & Anr. v. Leela Bhattacharya
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition based on a binding settlement agreement without drawing an executable decree, allowing parties to initiate independent proceedings for any future disputes.
Neelam Srivastava v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, without possession or compensation for over five years before the 2013 Act, are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, granting the petitioners a declaration of lapse.
Hamdard (Wakf) Laboratories v. Aslamzaki
The Delhi High Court held that TDS cannot be deducted on compensation amounts awarded or settled in labor disputes and directed refund of the wrongly deducted TDS amount to the employee.
Rajeev Kumar Goyal v. State through C.B.I.
The Delhi High Court acquitted L.K. Gupta for lack of evidence of criminal misconduct but upheld convictions of other appellants for cheating and forgery in fictitious marine insurance claims, modifying sentences and rejecting misjoinder prejudice claims.
Rajeev Kumar Goyal v. State through C.B.I.
Delhi High Court acquitted Branch Manager L.K. Gupta for lack of evidence of criminal misconduct but upheld convictions of co-accused for conspiracy and cheating in fictitious marine insurance claims, modifying sentences accordingly.
Rajeev Kumar Goyal v. State through C.B.I.
The Delhi High Court acquitted the Branch Manager for lack of evidence but upheld convictions of other appellants for cheating and forgery in fraudulent marine insurance claims, holding misjoinder of charges a curable irregularity without failure of justice.
A R Banerjee v. State
The Delhi High Court held that an admitted signature on a cheque precludes disputing the cheque's contents and dismissed the petition seeking handwriting expert opinion on the cheque body in a Section 138 NI Act complaint.
M/S H Dohil Constructions Co (P) Ltd v. Rohit Lal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's suo moto appointment of a Local Commissioner for recording evidence, emphasizing that essential trial functions cannot be delegated and financial burdens cannot be imposed without party consent.
National Highways Authority of India v. M/S. Sricon Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award awarding compensation for delays and additional costs in a highway contract, holding that judicial interference under Section 34 is limited and corrections to awards within statutory time are permissible.
Evaxo Pharma Private Limited v. USK Health Care Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Evaxo Pharma Private Limited and USK Health Care Private Limited under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, after ensuring statutory compliance and absence of objections.
IL & FS Environmental Infrastructure and Services Limited v. Integrated Waste Management and Urban Services Company (Tamil Nadu) Limited
The Delhi High Court approved a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors based on their written consents and no-objection certificates.
Evaxo Pharma Private Limited v. USK Health Care Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Evaxo Pharma Private Limited and USK Health Care Private Limited under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, directing transfer of assets and dissolution of the Transferor Company without winding up.
Swaranjeet Kaur Sachdeva v. Satish Chaudhary
The Delhi High Court decreed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 64 lakhs based on dishonoured cheques issued under a revocation agreement, proceeding ex parte due to defendant's non-appearance.
State v. Lalit Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition challenging the acquittal of the accused in a murder case due to incomplete chain of circumstances and lack of conclusive evidence.
M/S SWAROVSKI INDIA PVT LTD v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
The Delhi High Court held that reopening of income tax assessment beyond four years under section 147 is invalid without a clear finding of failure to disclose material facts, quashing the reassessment notice issued to Swarovski India Pvt Ltd.
Vargas Joseantonio Mauricio v. D.R.I.
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for possession of heroin, affirming that statutory presumptions under the NDPS Act shift the burden to the accused to prove lack of knowledge, which the appellant failed to discharge.
Tarun Kant v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and four-year sentence under Section 307 IPC for attempt to murder the appellant's wife, dismissing his plea for release based on time already served.
Sitab Ali Chaudhary v. Veerpal
Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Sections 395/397 IPC and Arms Act, ruling that visible possession of knives during robbery suffices for Section 397 even without recovery or medical proof of injury.
Yogesh Pandey v. Rohini Court Bar Association and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not available to challenge internal elections of private associations, dismissing the petition and directing the petitioner to pursue appropriate legal remedies.
Sitab Ali Chaudhary v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 397 IPC holding that mere possession or brandishing of knives visible to victims during robbery suffices as 'use' of deadly weapons, even without recovery or medical evidence.