Delhi High Court
92,849 judgments
SRG Infotech Ltd. & Ors. v. Securities and Exchange Board of India
The Delhi High Court held that limitation for taking cognizance under the SEBI Act starts from the date of approval of the investigation report by SEBI, and directors can be summoned only if shown to be in charge and responsible, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to the summoning order.
Directorate of Revenue Intelligence v. Anil Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that Ketamine Hydrochloride is a psychotropic substance under the NDPS Act, set aside bail granted to accused involved in large-scale drug trafficking, and directed their surrender for trial.
Ankit Yadav v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act for electricity theft after the outstanding dues were paid and the complainant withdrew prosecution, relying on its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and Supreme Court precedent.
Shashi Kant Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that vacancies arising from non-joining of General Category candidates in the CAPF Assistant Commandant Examination cannot be filled from the reserved list unless the examination rules explicitly provide for it.
MCD v. Mahender Pratap Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's award granting second ACP benefits to a workman based on the existence of a promotional hierarchy under the ACP Scheme, dismissing the employer's challenge.
M/S THE BALUSSERY BENEFIT CHIT FUND PVT. LTD. v. SMT. MEETA KUMAR
The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory 15-day limitation for filing leave to defend in eviction proceedings, dismissing the tenant's petition for being time-barred based on the date of summons service.
M/S MONEYLINE CREDIT LTD. v. SH. SANJEEV KUMAR AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that without deposit of original title deeds, no equitable mortgage is created, and bona fide purchasers without notice acquire valid title, dismissing the appellant's execution appeal.
Devender Kumar Sharma v. Santosh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition permitting a co-owner in possession to replace doors and install electricity in a jointly owned shop, holding such acts incidental to possession and protected under Section 151 CPC.
Wanti Bai v. Baldev Raj Ahuja
The High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing amendment of the plaint to challenge a Will, holding that such amendment does not prejudice the defendant's rights and that preliminary issues can be decided subsequently.
Mr. P. Roy Chaudhuri with Mr. Rohit Madan, Advocates. v. ANIL BATRA & ANR .....
The Delhi High Court held that directors of a company can be prosecuted under Section 276-B of the Income Tax Act without separate show cause notices if the complaint treats them as principal officers, convicting the directors and granting them probation.
Mr. P. Roy Chaudhuri with Mr. Rohit Madan, Advocates. v. ANIL BATRA & ANR .....
The Delhi High Court held that directors of a company can be prosecuted under Section 276-B of the Income Tax Act without separate notices if the complaint treats them as principal officers, setting aside their acquittals and convicting them with benefit of probation.
Mr. P. Roy Chaudhuri with Mr. Rohit Madan, Advocates. v. ANIL BATRA & ANR .....
The Delhi High Court held that directors of a company can be prosecuted under Section 276-B of the Income Tax Act without separate notices if the complaint treats them as principal officers, convicting the directors and granting them probation.
American Express Foreign Exchange Services India Ltd. v. American Express Services India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between two American Express companies, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors due to their consent and absence of objections under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.
The Haryana State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority v. M/S Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld a consent order restraining prosecution against Maruti Suzuki for non-obtaining prior environmental clearance, affirming the State's discretion in prosecution and the binding nature of consent orders in writ proceedings.
Kusum v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant for non-compliance with mandatory procedural safeguards under Section 42(2) of the NDPS Act relating to secret information, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory requirements in narcotics cases.
Santosh Sharma v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 380 and 448 IPC based on a bona fide settlement between parties, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash non-compoundable offences in appropriate cases.
Jatin Walia & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, applying its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Gainda Raikwal v. Kundan Lal Menghani
The Delhi High Court held that jurisdictional objections not raised in the suit or appeal cannot be raised in execution proceedings, dismissing the petition challenging possession decree execution.
V2 CORP & ANR. v. INNOVATIVE TECHPACK LIMITED
The Delhi High Court modified an interim injunction in a design infringement suit, allowing the defendant limited use of prior known design features while restraining use of novel features, affirming principles of novelty and originality under the Designs Act, 2000.
Urmila Devi Sharma & Ors. v. Pramod Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court re-framed issues and reversed onus in a property dispute involving alleged joint family ownership, emphasizing burden of proof principles and compliance with court directions.