Delhi High Court
92,849 judgments
C.P. Paper Private Limited & Ors. v. Thakurji Towers Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors based on their written consents.
ACEE Enterprises v. Commissioner of Income Tax – I
The Delhi High Court held that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in dismissing appeals without examining the factual matrix for classification of shares, remanding the matter for detailed inquiry for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09.
Rakesh Jain v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that revision petitions filed under repealed FERA were maintainable only if saved by FEMA, but quashed proceedings against directors without prosecuting companies, restoring exoneration orders due to procedural and evidentiary flaws.
Rakesh Jain v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that revision petitions filed by the Enforcement Directorate after repeal of FERA were not maintainable and restored the exoneration of appellants due to procedural flaws and lack of reliable evidence.
S. L. Gupta v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s order condoning a short delay in filing written statements, holding that the prescribed period under CPC is directory and such delays can be routinely condoned to serve justice.
Vikram Aggarwal v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that reinstatement with back wages is not automatic in illegal termination cases after long delay and enhanced compensation is appropriate in lieu thereof.
M/S Pintoji Foods Pvt Ltd v. Punjab National Bank & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the bank's decision refusing further financial assistance to a non-viable unit, emphasizing procedural compliance and rejecting judicial direction to invest public funds in economically unviable projects.
Hari Prakash & Anr. v. BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction and sentence under the Electricity Act following an amicable settlement involving payment of civil liability and waiver of fine.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Ved Kumar Chopra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal granting recovery rights against the vehicle owner and driver due to the driver's forged license constituting a breach of the insurance policy.
Davinder Singh v. Ravinder Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for partition and injunction as not maintainable after the plaintiff failed to prove invalidity of transfer documents in a prior suit, emphasizing prevention of vexatious litigation.
Faiz Mohd. & Anr. v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the parents of dowry harassment charges, set aside the husband's murder conviction due to lack of evidence of his presence at death, and remanded the case for further trial limited to the murder charge.
Neelam & Ors. v. Rajiv Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the claimants' appeal to enhance compensation by reducing the deduction for personal expenses from 50% to 33%, while dismissing the UPSRTC's appeal to reduce compensation on account of income tax deduction.
Dinesh Kumar @ Kalu v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of multiple appellants for murder and attempt to murder, affirming the credibility of injured eyewitnesses despite material improvements in their testimonies and emphasizing the separation of grain from chaff in multi-accused cases.
Dinesh Kumar @ Kalu v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld life convictions of appellants for conspiracy and murder based on credible injured eyewitness testimony corroborated by ballistic and medical evidence, rejecting challenges based on material improvements and lack of explicit conspiracy proof.
Dinesh Kumar @ Kalu v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for murder and attempt to murder based on credible injured eyewitness testimonies corroborated by medical and ballistic evidence, emphasizing the principle of separating the grain from the chaff in witness statements.
Dinesh Kumar @ Kalu v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of multiple appellants for murder and attempt to murder, affirming the reliability of injured eyewitnesses despite material improvements and emphasizing the need to separate credible evidence from embellishments.
Dinesh Kumar @ Kalu v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for murder and attempt to murder based on credible injured eyewitness testimony corroborated by medical and ballistic evidence, rejecting defense claims of false implication and procedural lapses.
Dinesh Kumar @ Kalu v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for murder and attempt to murder based on credible injured eyewitness testimony despite material improvements, emphasizing the separation of grain from chaff and rejecting the doctrine of falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus as a mandatory rule.
Dinesh Kumar @ Kalu v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of multiple appellants for murder and attempt to murder based on credible injured eyewitness testimony, corroborated by ballistic and police evidence, rejecting challenges based on improvements and contradictions in statements.
Dinesh Kumar @ Kalu v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of appellants for conspiracy and murder based on credible injured eyewitness testimony corroborated by medical and ballistic evidence, rejecting challenges based on material improvements and contradictions.