Delhi High Court
92,849 judgments
Intel Corporation v. Gautam Gupta & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the defendants' use of 'Intel Land Developers Private Limited' infringed the well-known trademark 'INTEL' and amounted to passing off, granting injunction and damages to the plaintiff.
Joint Action Council of Service Doctor's Organisation v. Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, Deptt. of Personnel and Training and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that Central Health Scheme officers covered under DACP are entitled to Non-Functional Upgradation benefits as per Sixth Central Pay Commission recommendations, quashing the executive's denial as arbitrary and unsustainable.
Union of India v. Anil Kumar Yadav
The Delhi High Court upheld cancellation of a temporary MTS appointment made without SSC involvement, emphasizing binding effect of DoPT recruitment instructions and rejecting the CAT's reinstatement order.
Sangita Rehan & Ors. v. Surinder Kishan Grover & Ors.
The Delhi High Court rejected the plaintiffs' partition suit as barred by limitation and estoppel due to acceptance of benefits under a registered Will, allowing the defendant's application to dismiss the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
Sh. Sharwan Jain v. Sh. Radhey Shyam
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction under the Delhi Rent Control Act based on voluntary admissions and compromise, dismissing the petition challenging the earlier order granting benefit under Section 14(2) as frivolous.
Jai Mal Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s writ challenging his non-selection in the CRPF SI(GD) LDCE-2008 for failing to secure minimum interview marks and due to delay in filing the petition.
CT/GD Jay Prakash Sharma v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a frivolous writ petition with costs, relying on a prior related decision to uphold judicial discipline.
Bharat Bank v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed summons against company directors and secretary under Sections 138/141 NI Act for lack of specific allegations showing they were responsible for the company's business at the time of cheque dishonour.
Bharat Bank v. State
The High Court quashed summons against company directors and secretary under Section 141 of the NI Act for cheque dishonour, holding that mere designation without specific responsibility for company affairs does not attract vicarious criminal liability.
Bharat Bank v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed summons against company directors and secretary under Sections 138/141 NI Act for lack of specific allegations showing they were responsible for the company's business at the time of cheque dishonour.
Surender Singh Khrub v. State Election Commission
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging the shifting of polling stations in municipal elections, holding that election disputes must be raised by election petitions and courts will not entertain purely declaratory writs without consequential relief.
Bharat Bank v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed summons against company directors and secretary under Sections 138/141 NI Act for dishonour of cheque, holding that mere designation without specific allegations of control and responsibility is insufficient for vicarious liability.
Manoj Komal & Ors. v. Sardar Gurpreet Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the execution of a decree for possession of 20 sq. yards, ruling that the executing court cannot entertain objections disputing the identity of the decreed property once the decree is final and binding.
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK ALL CADRE COOP. THRIFT AND CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. v. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
The court held that mere permissive use without exclusive possession does not entitle a society to relief under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act against dispossession from bank premises.
Rameshwar Pal v. Chander Dass
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging refusal to amend the written statement in a possession suit, holding that the issue of HUF property was already decided and allowing amendment would cause undue delay and prejudice.
Sh. Ram Naresh v. Smt. Narayani Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction due to tenant's failure to file leave to defend within the statutory period, holding that service formality does not delay the commencement of the limitation period and jurisdictional objections must be raised timely.
National Textile Corporation Ltd. v. Divya Kakkar
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the ground of the landlady's bonafide necessity to carry on a restaurant business, ruling that prior legal notices without pleading such necessity do not bar eviction petitions.
Sita Ram v. The State
The Delhi High Court modified a murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder where a sudden quarrel led to fatal injuries inflicted by a household weapon, emphasizing circumstantial evidence and absence of premeditation.
Caraf Builders & Constructions Private Limited v. DLF Cyber City Developers Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Arrangement/Demerger under the Companies Act, 1956 after ensuring statutory compliance and absence of objections.
Indian Express Newspapers v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that enforcement of paid holidays on polling days under Section 135B of the Representation of the Peoples Act, 1951 lies with the competent Magistrate and dismissed the writ petition for lack of jurisdiction.