Delhi High Court

92,849 judgments

Year:

Jagbir Singh v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi

13 Oct 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:5291

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to restrain demolition of a religious structure on acquired land, granting interim protection and directing the petitioner to challenge acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act before the appropriate forum.

property petition_dismissed land acquisition Section 24(2) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 possession

Anju Kapoor v. Vijay Kumar Sharma & Ors.

13 Oct 2014 · Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:5305

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by properly assessing functional disability and loss of future earnings based on evidence, emphasizing that permanent disability percentage should not be mechanically equated to economic loss.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 Permanent disability Loss of future earnings

United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Babita Kanodia & Ors.

13 Oct 2014 · JAYANT NATH · 2014:DHC:5307

The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident compensation award based on the deceased’s income tax return and rejected the insurer’s plea of contributory negligence and erroneous income computation.

civil appeal_dismissed loss of dependency income tax return future prospects contributory negligence

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Bharat Singh Negi

13 Oct 2014 · Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:5306

The Delhi High Court held that the Insurance Company is statutorily liable to pay compensation for a fatal accident despite breach of policy conditions but may recover the amount from the insured owner or driver.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Accident Claims Act Insurance liability Gratuitous passengers Breach of insurance policy

Ramwati & Anr. v. Shashi & Ors.

13 Oct 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:5310

The Delhi High Court held that plaintiffs and defendants are entitled to equal shares in the suit property, rejected the alleged family settlement for lack of evidence, and appointed a Local Commissioner to effect physical partition.

civil appeal_allowed partition suit family settlement legal heirs preliminary decree

Gaurav Taneja v. State and Others

13 Oct 2014 · G. P. Mittal · 2014:DHC:5308

The Delhi High Court granted probate of a valid Will executed by the deceased in favor of the petitioner, with no objections from other legal heirs.

civil petition_allowed Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 274 probate Will

Central Park Estates Pvt Ltd & Anr v. CHD Developers Ltd

13 Oct 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:5300

The Delhi High Court upheld the plaintiffs' registered trademark rights in BELLEVUE, granted an interim injunction against the defendant's use of the identical mark for real estate projects, and rejected the defendant's claim that the mark was generic.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off registered trademark BELLEVUE

Deepak Talwar & Anr v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors

13 Oct 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:5299

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Sections 323, 324, 341, and 34 IPC on the ground of an amicable settlement between the parties, applying its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Yatender Sharma v. State & Anr.

13 Oct 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:5297

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal proceeding under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on a genuine settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Mohan Lal Gandhi v. Land Acquisition Collector

13 Oct 2014 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Siddharth Mridul · 2014:DHC:5283-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse if possession is not taken within five years before the 2013 Act's commencement, deeming such acquisitions invalid despite compensation deposit.

property petition_allowed Significant land acquisition possession Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 Section 24(2)

Manoj Saini v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

13 Oct 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:5284

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground of an amicable settlement in a matrimonial dispute, applying its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Ms Mamta & Ors. v. State & Anr.

13 Oct 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:5286

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal proceeding under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon amicable settlement and the complainant's disinterest, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes non-compoundable offences

Yusra Hashmi v. University of Delhi & Ors.

13 Oct 2014 · Manmohan · 2014:DHC:5285
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the University of Delhi's refusal to grant admission beyond the cut-off date, holding that the deadline was valid and the University's action was neither arbitrary nor discriminatory.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant admission cut-off date General Clauses Act Section 10 university admission equality principle

ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. SMT KRISHAN & ORS

13 Oct 2014 · JAYANT NATH · 2014:DHC:5293

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal against a motor accident compensation award, upholding the multiplier applied and denying recovery rights due to the owner's lack of knowledge of the driver's license cancellation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant loss of dependency multiplier driving license cancellation recovery rights

Joint Action Council of Service Doctor's Organisation v. Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, Deptt. of Personnel and Training

13 Oct 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vipin Sanghi · 2014:DHC:5303-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that Central Health Scheme officers covered under DACP are entitled to Non-Functional Upgradation benefits as per Sixth Central Pay Commission recommendations, quashing the executive's denial as arbitrary.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant Non-Functional Upgradation Sixth Central Pay Commission Dynamic Assured Career Progression Central Health Scheme

Tushar Keshaorao Deshmukh v. Union of India and Anr.

13 Oct 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vipin Sanghi · 2014:DHC:5302-DB

The Delhi High Court held that disabled OBC candidates are entitled to three additional attempts in the Civil Services Examination beyond the seven allowed to non-disabled OBC candidates, quashing the UPSC's cancellation of the petitioner's candidature for exceeding attempts.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Civil Services Examination disabled OBC candidates number of attempts Articles 14 and 16

Vinod & Anr v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

13 Oct 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:5298

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC after the parties settled amicably and obtained a mutual consent divorce, emphasizing the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes non-compoundable offences

Dr. Mukul M. Sangma v. P.A. Sangma & Ors.

13 Oct 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:5280

The Delhi High Court granted an ex-parte interim injunction restraining a former Chief Minister and media defendants from repeating or publishing unsubstantiated defamatory statements against the sitting Chief Minister, balancing freedom of expression with protection of reputation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant defamation interim injunction freedom of speech Article 19(1) and 19(2)

KRISHAN LAL MADHOK v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

13 Oct 2014 · BADAR DURREZ AHMED; SIDDHARTH MRIDUL · 2014:DHC:5281-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings pending for over five years without possession or compensation prior to the 2013 Act are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Act.

property petition_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Section 24(2) Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Amachi Jude Onyeka v. State

13 Oct 2014 · Sunita Gupta · 2014:DHC:5282

Bail was denied to a foreign national accused under the NDPS Act where the seized substance was of commercial quantity and purity discrepancies were irrelevant post-government notification.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail NDPS Act purity percentage commercial quantity