Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
Moradabad Toll Road Co. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that a toll road is a 'building' and not a 'plant' under the Income Tax Act, 1961, entitling the assessee to depreciation at the rate applicable to buildings but not at the higher rate applicable to plants.
S.M. Matloob v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's application seeking reliefs based on events after disposal of the original PIL alleging ICCR corruption, holding such reliefs cannot be granted in a disposed petition.
MS. SHABNAM SHAMSI v. MS. FARZANA BEGUM
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant’s petition challenging the trial court’s order striking off her defence for willful non-compliance with the order to deposit rent in a possession suit.
MAGPIE PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years before the 2013 Act's commencement.
Vishnu Hiranand Kirpalani v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act pending for over five years without possession or compensation are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
M/S American Express International India Pvt. Ltd v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court ordered the voluntary winding up and dissolution of M/s American Express International India Pvt. Ltd. upon full compliance with statutory requirements under the Companies Act, 1956.
Vrinda Farms Pvt. Ltd v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act without possession or compensation for over five years prior to the 2013 Act are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
Gagan Chopra v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of physical possession.
Ramnk Singh Uppal & Ors v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of possession disputes.
Rakesh Jain v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation are not completed within five years, declaring the petitioners' acquisition proceedings lapsed.
BLB LTD. v. THE CALCUTTA STOCK EXCHANGE
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's appeal seeking to summon documents irrelevant to the recovery suit, holding that discovery for collateral investigations is impermissible under Order XVI Rule 1 CPC.
SANJEEV KUMAR v. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition challenging cancellation of an Indian Oil dealership, holding that inadvertent errors overlooked initially cannot justify termination without verifying actual performance and adherence to grievance procedures.
Suresh Pahwa and Anr v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act where no possession or compensation occurred within five years of the award are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
Ratna Sareen v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation are not completed within five years of the award.
Sushil Kumar Gupta v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse if compensation remains unpaid for over five years before the 2013 Act, granting the petitioner a declaration of lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
Zile Singh v. Lieutenant Governor
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition under the 1894 Act lapses if compensation remains unpaid for over five years before the 2013 Act, declaring the acquisition in this case lapsed.
GREEN FINANCE PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act due to non-payment of compensation for over five years.
Ajay Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction of appellants based on reliable eyewitness testimony, corroborative evidence, and forensic reports, rejecting their claim of a sudden quarrel and modifying the conviction.
Ajay Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction of appellants based on reliable portions of a hostile eyewitness's testimony corroborated by forensic evidence and contemporaneous statements, rejecting the plea for reduction to culpable homicide.
The Chief Secretary, GNCTD and Anr. v. Sh. Narender Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that qualification through the typing test is a mandatory eligibility for promotion to Grade III (DASS), and the GNCTD was justified in denying retrospective promotion to an employee who lacked this qualification.