Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
BAYER CORPORATION v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that export of patented pharmaceutical API for regulatory studies abroad falls within the safe harbor exemption under Section 107A of the Patents Act, 1970 and does not constitute patent infringement.
State v. Deepak
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal, upholding the acquittal of the accused on charges of abduction and rape due to lack of evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
Bestochem Formulations (I) Limited v. Alps Pharmaceuticals (Pvt.) Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to the plaintiff for trademark infringement and passing off of the mark "COLISPAS" by defendants who failed to contest the suit.
United India Insurance Co Ltd. v. Ishwar Lal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident compensation award, ruling that the multiplier for loss of dependency must be based on the deceased's age and not the claimant's, and dismissed the insurer's appeal challenging the quantum and impleading of the driver.
Heineken Asia Pacific Pte Ltd v. Surjeet Lal and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining defendants from using the mark TIGER CHAKRA and tiger device, holding it infringed the plaintiff's registered trademark TIGER under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Mahinder Singh & Anr v. Gaon Sabha Ghitorni
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging land vesting under the DLR Act, holding that continuous unauthorized construction extends limitation and final orders without preliminary decrees can be valid.
Denso India Limited v. Unknown
The Delhi High Court confirmed the reduction of share capital of Denso India Limited under Sections 100 to 105 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with the procedure under Section 101(2) after ensuring creditor protection and requisite approvals.
The Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. Fateh Singh Rana & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that BSNL can recover excess salary payments made under mistake of fact without employee culpability but limited recovery to three years on equitable grounds, modifying the CAT order accordingly.
Manish Kumar Khanna v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the refusal to impose costs on the prosecution for adjournments, holding that the trial court's discretion was judicially exercised and the petitioner as defence counsel is not entitled to such costs.
Satish Jain & Ors. v. Taro Devi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenants' revision petition, holding that bona fide necessity of the landlord's family member for business use justifies eviction despite payment of pagri and absence of alternative accommodation.
Ashwani Sharma & Ors. v. Kanta Sharma & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging dismissal of the first appeal for non-prosecution, holding the suit lacked prima facie merit and was an abuse of process.
Urmila & Anr. v. Ram Avatar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction decree passed ex parte under the Delhi Rent Control Act and held that objections in execution proceedings cannot substitute contesting the main eviction petition, dismissing the petition under Article 227.
Narcotics Control Bureau v. Anju Tiwari & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in an NDPS case due to failure of the prosecution to produce genuine independent witnesses and involuntariness of confessional statements.
STAR INDIA PVT LTD & ANR v. ROY MA & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted ex-parte interim injunctions and directed blocking of rogue websites infringing the plaintiffs' exclusive broadcasting and copyright rights in the 2014 India-Sri Lanka cricket series.
Narender Kumar Sharma v. Ram Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal against a possession decree, holding that issues not raised earlier cannot be entertained and concurrent findings of fact are binding absent substantial questions of law.
Rajeev Chaudhary v. Baldev Raj Wasan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding the decree for possession based on appellant's admission and sufficient description of the suit property without requiring partition.
M L Sharma v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking direction to the Land Acquisition Collector for substitution as legal heir, upholding the Reference Court's order due to absence of proof of application under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC.
Tarun Kaushik v. Seema Kaushik
The Delhi High Court upheld interim maintenance of Rs. 7,000 per month to the respondent wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act despite her capability to earn, as she was not actually employed due to the troubled marriage.
Poonam Chopra & Anr. v. Satish Chopra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a Memorandum of Understanding acted upon by parties is binding and directed the corporate guarantor to clear the loan to protect plaintiffs from property sale under SARFESI Act.
Jagdish Sagar v. Bar Council of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the Bar Council of India's Rule 7 restriction on retired officers practicing before certain tribunals but clarified that such officers may practice before judicial officers of any rank within the territorial jurisdiction.