Delhi High Court

93,075 judgments

Year:

Azad Singh v. Ram Narayan

12 Nov 2014 · Sunil Gaur · 2014:DHC:5927

The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding the dismissal of a possession suit due to failure of the appellants to prove ownership and existence of the shop, with no substantial question of law arising.

civil appeal_dismissed possession suit ownership proof oral partition contradictory testimony

Kishan Lal v. Provident Fund Inspector

12 Nov 2014 · V.P. Vaish · 2014:DHC:5961

The Delhi High Court held that payment of provident fund dues after filing of complaint does not absolve the employer from criminal liability and refused to quash the complaint under the EPF Act.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 482 Cr.P.C. criminal breach of trust Section 405 IPC

Kishan Lal v. Provident Fund Inspector

12 Nov 2014 · V.P. Vaish · 2014:DHC:5960

The Delhi High Court held that depositing provident fund dues after filing of a complaint does not absolve the employer from criminal liability and refused to quash the complaint under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Employees Pension Scheme, 1995 Section 482 Cr.P.C. criminal breach of trust

Kishan Lal v. Provident Fund Inspector

12 Nov 2014 · V.P. Vaish · 2014:DHC:5959

The Delhi High Court held that payment of provident fund dues after filing of complaint does not absolve the employer from criminal liability and refused to quash the complaint under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Employees Pension Scheme, 1995 Section 482 Cr.P.C. criminal breach of trust

Kishan Lal v. Provident Fund Inspector

12 Nov 2014 · V.P. Vaish · 2014:DHC:5958

The Delhi High Court held that belated payment of employees’ provident fund contributions after complaint filing does not absolve the employer of offence and refused to quash the complaint under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 482 Cr.P.C. criminal breach of trust Section 405 IPC

Sneh Lata v. Ashok Kumar Dhull

12 Nov 2014 · Sunil Gaur · 2014:DHC:5939

The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion where the appellant's conduct was not effectively disputed and evidence was within pleadings.

family appeal_dismissed Significant cruelty desertion divorce matrimonial dispute

Beant Singh v. Compack Enterprises India (P) Ltd

12 Nov 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:5938

The Delhi High Court held that service of summons in a possession suit validly terminates monthly tenancy under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, enabling summary decree for possession despite claims of unregistered agreement to sell.

civil appeal_allowed Significant possession suit monthly tenancy Section 106 Transfer of Property Act service of summons

Dev Kant Kamat v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

12 Nov 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:5936

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act on the ground of an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as per the Supreme Court precedent in Gian Singh.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 135 Indian Electricity Act theft of electricity

Alankar Rajput v. State

12 Nov 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:5935

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 324 and 34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in line with Supreme Court precedents.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences amicable settlement

Jaganath & Ors. v. State & Anr.

12 Nov 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:5934

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes Section 498A IPC

Mohit Bansal v. State N.C.T. of Delhi

12 Nov 2014 · Indermeet Kaur, J. · 2014:DHC:5921
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that it cannot alter its final judgment or sentence under inherent powers after pronouncement and upheld conviction under Section 354 IPC without prior specific charge, dismissing the appellant's plea for probation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC Section 362 CrPC Section 222 CrPC Section 354 IPC

Kishan Lal v. Provident Fund Inspector

12 Nov 2014 · V.P. Vaish · 2014:DHC:5942

The Delhi High Court held that payment of provident fund dues after filing of a complaint does not absolve the employer from criminal liability and refused to quash the complaint under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 14(1A) Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of complaint

Kishan Lal v. Provident Fund Inspector

12 Nov 2014 · V.P. Vaish · 2014:DHC:5968

The Delhi High Court held that belated payment of provident fund dues after filing of complaint does not absolve the employer from criminal liability and refused to quash the complaint under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 482 Cr.P.C. Provident fund contributions Criminal breach of trust

Uma Kumari v. Chairman Managing Committee, Air Force School

12 Nov 2014 · Hima Kohli · 2014:DHC:5967

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the appointment of a TGT (Hindi) teacher, holding that possession of the TET certificate was not mandatory at the time of recruitment and the appointment was valid.

administrative petition_dismissed Teacher Eligibility Test TET certificate National Council for Teacher Education appointment validity

Kishan Lal v. Provident Fund Inspector

12 Nov 2014 · V.P. Vaish · 2014:DHC:5966

The Delhi High Court held that delayed payment of provident fund contributions after complaint filing does not absolve the employer from criminal liability and refused to quash the complaint.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Employees Pension Scheme, 1995 Section 482 Cr.P.C. criminal breach of trust

Kishan Lal v. Provident Fund Inspector

12 Nov 2014 · V.P. Vaish · 2014:DHC:5965

The Delhi High Court held that payment of provident fund dues after filing of complaint does not absolve the employer from criminal liability and refused to quash the complaint under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 482 Cr.P.C. criminal breach of trust Section 405 IPC

Kishan Lal v. Provident Fund Inspector

12 Nov 2014 · V.P. Vaish · 2014:DHC:5964

The Delhi High Court held that belated payment of employees’ pension fund contributions after filing of complaint does not absolve the employer of criminal liability and refused to quash the complaint under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Employees Pension Scheme, 1995 Section 482 Cr.P.C. criminal breach of trust

Kishan Lal v. Provident Fund Inspector

12 Nov 2014 · V.P. Vaish · 2014:DHC:5963

The Delhi High Court held that deposit of provident fund dues after filing of a complaint does not absolve the employer from criminal liability and refused to quash the complaint under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of complaint employees’ pension fund contribution

Kishan Lal v. Provident Fund Inspector

12 Nov 2014 · V.P. Vaish · 2014:DHC:5962

The Delhi High Court held that belated payment of provident fund dues after filing of complaint does not absolve the employer from criminal liability and refused to quash the complaint.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Employees Pension Scheme, 1995 Section 482 Cr.P.C. criminal breach of trust

Smt. Anita Gupta & Ors. v. Shri Narender Kumar Gupta & Anr

12 Nov 2014 · G. P. Mittal · 2014:DHC:5989

The Delhi High Court held that daughters as Class I legal heirs are entitled to equal partition of their deceased father's property despite marriage expenses, and non-joinder of their children does not invalidate the suit.

civil appeal_allowed partition suit non-joinder Class I legal heirs daughters' share