Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
Kishan Lal v. Provident Fund Inspector
The Delhi High Court held that belated payment of provident fund contributions after filing of a criminal complaint does not absolve the employer of criminal liability and refused to quash the complaint.
Mitsui Chemicals India Pvt. Ltd. v. KT Holidays Private Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting reasonable damages for premature termination of a car hire contract, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
State v. Jagtar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court acquitted Gian Chand and set aside his death sentence due to insufficient and unreliable evidence, including hostile witness testimony and unproven recovery of incriminating material.
State v. Jagtar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court acquitted Gian Chand and set aside his death sentence due to insufficient and unreliable evidence, emphasizing the need for conclusive proof in capital cases.
Kishan Lal v. Provident Fund Inspector
The Delhi High Court held that belated payment of employees’ provident fund contributions after complaint filing does not absolve the employer from criminal liability and refused to quash the complaint under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Kishan Lal v. Provident Fund Inspector
The Delhi High Court held that belated payment of provident fund contributions after filing of complaint does not absolve the employer from criminal liability and refused to quash the complaint under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Kishan Lal v. Provident Fund Inspector
The Delhi High Court held that belated payment of provident fund contributions after filing of complaint does not absolve the employer of criminal liability and refused to quash the complaint.
Kishan Lal v. Provident Fund Inspector
The Delhi High Court held that deposit of provident fund contributions after filing of complaint does not absolve the employer from criminal liability and refused to quash the complaint under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Kishan Lal v. Provident Fund Inspector
The Delhi High Court held that deposit of provident fund dues after filing of complaint does not absolve the employer of criminal liability and refused to quash the complaint under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Kishan Lal v. Provident Fund Inspector
The Delhi High Court held that deposit of provident fund dues after filing of complaint does not absolve the employer of criminal liability and refused to quash the complaint under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Kishan Lal v. Provident Fund Inspector
The Delhi High Court held that payment of provident fund dues after filing of complaint does not absolve the employer from criminal liability and refused to quash the complaint under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Kishan Lal v. Provident Fund Inspector
The Delhi High Court held that belated payment of provident fund dues after complaint filing does not absolve criminal liability and refused to quash the complaint under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Urmila Tyagi & Ors. v. Akbar Khan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and held the insurance company liable to pay full compensation, rejecting the tribunal's finding of contributory negligence against the deceased in a motor accident claim.
Shanti Devi & Ors. v. Parvinder
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal, holding that the validity of sale without co-sharers' consent and possession based on General Power of Attorney are factual issues requiring trial.
Union of India v. P N Arora & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal, upholding compensation awarded for land acquired under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, based on established precedent.
Babita alias Kavita v. Manoj Kumar
The High Court directed the Family Court to prioritize and decide the petitioner's pending application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act within three months, despite heavy case pendency.
Piyali Das Gupta v. Sh Shantanu Das Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that territorial jurisdiction under the Guardians and Wards Act is a mixed question of fact and law not decidable on a preliminary application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and dismissed the appellant’s petition challenging jurisdiction.
M/S KEW PRECISION PARTS (PVT) LTD. v. SANDHYA ADLAKHA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court upheld decrees for possession in landlord-tenant suits, holding that filing suit terminates an unregistered lease and attorney's deposition is admissible evidence.
M/S KEW PRECISION PARTS (PVT) LTD. v. SANDHYA ADLAKHA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court upheld decrees for possession against the appellant, ruling that filing a suit terminates an unregistered lease and that attorney deposition is admissible evidence.
Basanti Devi v. Sukh Ram
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition, holding that the Shiv Mandir Committee had the authority to terminate the appellants' license as it was legally entrusted with the property's management.