Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
Sonika Gandas v. Sachin Gandas
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of a matrimonial proceeding on grounds of inconvenience, holding that reasonable accessibility and procedural norms do not warrant transfer.
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Raj Kumari Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, holding that a copy of the insurance policy cannot be relied upon without producing the original, and thus the insurer cannot avoid liability for compensation in a motor accident claim on unproven breach of policy terms.
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Amrit Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld compensation awarded on the basis of loss of gratuitous services of a housewife in a motor accident claim where the deceased's income was not proven.
The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd v. Kashmir Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal, holding that the insurer failed to prove a conscious and willful breach of the insurance policy terms to deny liability for compensation in a motor accident claim.
Delhi Development Authority v. Madhuban Holiday Inn & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an increase in the extent of unauthorized commercial use beyond that existing prior to the Master Plan constitutes a violation of Section 14 of the Delhi Development Act, 1957, allowing the appeal and imposing a fine on the respondents.
Housing Development Finance Corp. Ltd v. Ankit Saxena and Others
The Delhi High Court granted summary decree for recovery of loan amount against defendants who failed to appear, rejecting alternative claim against a third party absent cancellation of allotment.
S P Gupta v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court refused to transfer multiple criminal cases to Patiala House Courts, emphasizing that transfer solely for personal convenience or change of judicial officer is unwarranted if it delays expeditious trial.
S P Gupta v. State
The Delhi High Court refused to transfer multiple criminal cases to Patiala House Courts, emphasizing expeditious trial and denying transfer merely due to change of judicial officer or convenience.
Surinder & Ors. v. State & Anr
The High Court dismissed the petition to quash the FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C., holding that the petitioners have an alternate efficacious remedy to raise their objections at the charge framing stage before the trial court.
Ved Praksh Dubey v. M/S Maheshwari Gas Service
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 36(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, representation by Advocates before the Labour Court is barred and prior judicial orders disallowing such representation cannot be circumvented by implied consent.
Ved Praksh Dubey; Jai Prakash Dubey; Ram Bachan Soni v. M/S Maheshwari Gas Service
The Delhi High Court held that the Management cannot be represented by an advocate before the Industrial Adjudicator contrary to the bar under Section 36(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act and prior final court orders, and that implied consent to such representation was not established.
Ved Praksh Dubey; Jai Prakash Dubey; Ram Bachan Soni v. M/S Maheshwari Gas Service
The Delhi High Court held that the statutory bar under Section 36(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act on advocate representation for Management is absolute and cannot be overridden by implied consent, setting aside orders allowing such representation.
Vishal Sharma v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to Vishal Sharma in a multi-offence FIR, subject to bail bonds and cooperation with investigation, following the precedent of co-accused granted bail.
Md Yusuf v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted pre-arrest bail to the petitioner accused of abducting his daughter, subject to bail bonds and cooperation with investigation.
Saroj Bhadana & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court refused to quash an FIR based on a compromise deed, holding that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC must be exercised sparingly and only when no prima facie offence is made out.
Rajan v. State
Pre-arrest bail was denied to the petitioner due to his adverse antecedents and involvement in causing grievous injury, despite co-accused with clean records being granted bail in a related FIR.
CIT-XI v. Tej Pal Singh Kohli
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT order allowing the assessee's deduction under Section 80-IC for manufacturing LCD monitors by assembling imported components, dismissing the Revenue's appeal based on mere doubts without concrete evidence.
Inder Singh v. Under Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that claims for compensation under the Displaced Persons Act must be pursued within a reasonable time and stale claims after decades of delay are barred by laches and limitation.
C.I.T. v. M/s M.G.F. (India) Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal as not maintainable under CBDT's ₹10 lakh tax effect threshold, without deciding on the substantive taxability of insurance premiums collected by the assessee.
Oswal Agro Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that contingent liabilities are not deductible under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, but losses due to currency devaluation are allowable deductions, partly allowing the appellant's appeal.