Full Text
Translation output
BAIL APPLN. 2767/2014 Page 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: January 12, 2015
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: January 12, 2015
BAIL APPLN. 2767/2014
VISHAL SHARMA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. K.Bhardwaj, Advocate
VISHAL SHARMA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. K.Bhardwaj, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-
State with SI Dinesh Kumar
Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-
State with SI Dinesh Kumar
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)
This is an application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.117/2013 under Sections 420/467/468/
471/448/120-B/34 of IPC registered at P.S. Ranhola, Delhi.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that co-accused-Shashi
Dhar Sharma has been already granted pre-arrest bail by another Bench of this Court vide order of 10th September, 2014 and that the case of petitioner is at par with the case of co-accused and that petitioner is ready to join the investigation as and when directed.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State has placed on record status report.
Without commenting upon merits of this case, it is directed that in
2015:DHC:213
This is an application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.117/2013 under Sections 420/467/468/
471/448/120-B/34 of IPC registered at P.S. Ranhola, Delhi.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that co-accused-Shashi
Dhar Sharma has been already granted pre-arrest bail by another Bench of this Court vide order of 10th September, 2014 and that the case of petitioner is at par with the case of co-accused and that petitioner is ready to join the investigation as and when directed.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State has placed on record status report.
Without commenting upon merits of this case, it is directed that in
2015:DHC:213
BAIL APPLN. 2767/2014 Page 2 the event of arrest, petitioner-Vishal Sharma S/o late Sh. Ram Sharma be admitted to bail, subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of
`25,000/- with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of
Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer. Needless to say, if petitioner fails to join investigation, then respondent-State would be at liberty to get this order revoked.
The application is accordingly disposed of.
Dasti.
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
JANUARY 12, 2015 s 2015:DHC:213
`25,000/- with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of
Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer. Needless to say, if petitioner fails to join investigation, then respondent-State would be at liberty to get this order revoked.
The application is accordingly disposed of.
Dasti.
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
JANUARY 12, 2015 s 2015:DHC:213