Delhi High Court
93,453 judgments
I.T.E India Pvt. Ltd. and Another v. Delhi Tourism Jand Transportation Development Corporation and Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the disqualification of a bidder from tenders due to contract termination within three years, holding that pending arbitration or unrelated proceedings do not affect tender eligibility under Clause 2.2.19.
Rajnikant v. The Commissioner of Police & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of the petitioner's candidature based on a fake driving licence, affirming that a forged licence cannot be validated by clerical errors or renewal and emphasizing the necessity of genuine documentation for employment.
Noida Mint Employees Union & Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court lacks territorial jurisdiction over employment benefit claims of employees posted at Noida despite the employer's corporate office being in Delhi.
Narender Singh Rana v. Director, Nehru Memorial Museum & Library
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the recruitment process for Senior Technical Assistant (Museum), upholding the validity of amended recruitment rules and estoppel against the petitioner.
Narinder Kumar Khanna v. General Insurance Corporation of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking promotion on a seniority-cum-merit basis where the petitioner failed to prove higher merit marks than selected candidates.
Archana Chugh v. The Managing Committee, Ramjas School
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging the appointment of an Officiating Principal, holding no legal entitlement exists for the senior-most teacher absent a statutory or binding rule.
Sanjeev Mittal v. Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that gains from long-held share transactions constitute capital gains, not business income, and set aside the ITAT's remand order, limiting further inquiry to short-term capital gains classification.
Harbans Kaur v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if physical possession is not taken within five years, declaring the petitioners' acquisition proceedings lapsed.
Rahul Singh Choudhary v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for robbery with use of a deadly weapon, holding that victim identification without TIP and sole victim testimony were sufficient for conviction.
Mohd. Hussain v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed as infructuous the appeal against conviction under Sections 366/376 IPC since the appellant had already served the sentence and paid the fine, and did not pursue the appeal.
Haji Mul @ Danish v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court affirmed the appellant's conviction under IPC and POCSO Act for sexual assault on a minor but modified the sentence considering mitigating factors and time already served.
Bijender v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed as infructuous the appeal against rape conviction after the appellant had served the sentence and paid the fine, due to non-prosecution and non-appearance.
Mukesh Kumar v. The State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 376 IPC for rape of a minor below 16 years but reduced the sentence from seven to three years considering mitigating factors.
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Jayesh Mehta
The Delhi High Court accepted a joint compromise application in a patent infringement suit, decreeing the suit based on the parties' voluntary settlement acknowledging patent validity and undertaking against future infringement.
M/S M.S LOGISTICS v. M/S AKANSHA CARGO MOVER
The Delhi High Court disposed of an execution petition after the parties settled the dispute and the decree was satisfied through payment under a compromise.
M/S ATOZ PHARMACEUTICALS PVT LTD v. OCHOA LABORATORIES LTD & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed a summary suit for default and non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's failure to serve summons and appear in court.
Dalip Yadav; Krishan Yadav v. Sukhbinder Singh Saini & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiffs to withdraw their civil suits with liberty to file fresh suits on the same cause of action, dismissing the suits as withdrawn.
Sree Kumar Textiles (P) Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court restrained coercive recovery measures against the petitioner until the statutory appeal under the Employees' Provident Fund Act is heard, due to the absence of a Presiding Officer in the Appellate Tribunal.
M/S. OSS TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD v. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER
The Delhi High Court restrained coercive recovery actions against the petitioner pending hearing of a statutory appeal that could not be heard due to non-appointment of the Appellate Tribunal’s Presiding Officer under the Employee’s Provident Fund Act.
Ved Prakash Singh v. R C Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed contempt petitions alleging violation of a settlement order regarding employment status, holding that compliance with the order negates contempt and directing petitioners to seek appropriate legal remedies.