Delhi High Court
93,453 judgments
Kamlesh Kumari & Ors. v. S. Manmohan Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's interim order permitting a tenant to carry out necessary repairs on rented premises, allowing final disputes to be adjudicated by the Trial Court and referring parties to mediation.
M/S. ADARSH VIDHYA MANDIR v. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER
Delhi High Court granted interim protection restraining coercive recovery measures due to non-appointment of Presiding Officer of the Appellate Tribunal, safeguarding the petitioner's statutory right of appeal under the EPF Act.
Gurbachan Singh Saluja v. Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corporation
The Delhi High Court directed comprehensive disclosure by the respondent bank regarding insurance claim receipts and accounting before the DRT proceeds to final hearing in a factoring dispute, emphasizing the tribunal's power to order discovery for fair adjudication.
Harvinder Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against the petitioner for lack of prima facie evidence implicating him in the alleged conspiracy and held that the sale deed was a bona fide transaction, emphasizing cautious exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Harvinder Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against the petitioner for lack of prima facie evidence linking him to the alleged conspiracy and held that mere purchase of property and equity does not establish criminal liability.
Harvinder Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a petitioner investor, holding that mere suspicion and lack of prima facie evidence cannot sustain summoning as an accused in a complex investor fraud case.
Harvinder Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a petitioner wrongly implicated as a conspirator in a real estate fraud case due to lack of prima facie evidence and held that mere suspicion cannot sustain prosecution.
Harvinder Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against the petitioner for lack of prima facie evidence implicating him in the alleged conspiracy and held that mere purchase of property and equity does not attract criminal liability without active participation.
Harvinder Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a petitioner accused of conspiracy and cheating, holding that mere suspicion without prima facie evidence is insufficient to summon an accused under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Harvinder Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed the proceedings against the petitioner for lack of prima facie evidence, holding that mere suspicion and uncorroborated allegations cannot sustain criminal prosecution or summoning as an accused.
Harvinder Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a petitioner accused of conspiracy and cheating, holding that mere suspicion and uncorroborated allegations without prima facie evidence do not justify summoning in criminal cases.
Subhash Chand Jain & Ors. v. Rukmani Devi Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an Arbitrator's interim order granting maintenance under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act is appealable under Section 37 and directed moderated interim maintenance payments pending final adjudication in a partition dispute.
Harvinder Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against the petitioner for lack of prima facie evidence, holding that mere suspicion and uncorroborated allegations are insufficient to summon an accused under Sections 406, 409, 420, 201 read with 120-B IPC.
United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Jay Devi & Ors.
The High Court set aside a motor accident compensation award due to inadequate proof of negligence and remanded the matter for fresh inquiry, emphasizing the claimant's burden to prove rash and negligent driving under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act.
United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Jay Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the compensation award in a motor accident claim for failure to properly establish negligence and accident timing, remanding the matter for fresh inquiry.
United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Jay Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the compensation award in a fatal motor accident case due to inadequate inquiry into negligence and accident timing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.
CIT v. Bharti Telenet Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld ITAT rulings allowing Bharti's claims on variable license fees, upfront fees, pre-operative expenses, and interest, remitting only the delayed payment interest issue for reassessment.
M/S Amadeus India Pvt Ltd v. Suman Bhagat & Ors
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal by recording the parties' settlement under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC and allowed a 50% refund of court fees under Section 16A of the Court Fees Act, 1870.
University of Delhi v. Dropti Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 overrides other enactments including the Delhi University Act, and the University must pay gratuity as per the Act unless exempted.
Supreme Court in Maharashtra Ekta Hawkers Union and v. Anr., 2013(11) SCALE 329. l Learned counsel for
The Delhi High Court held that disputes regarding street vendors' status must be resolved by the Town Vending Committee under the Street Vendors Act, 2014, and directed the Committee to be made functional, dismissing interim injunctions against eviction.