Delhi High Court

93,877 judgments

Year:

Chamanlal Verma v. Union of India & Ors.

23 Feb 2015 · V.K. Shali · 2016:DHC:1523
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the trial court's refusal to restore a suit dismissed for non-prosecution, holding that negligence of counsel does not constitute sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Order IX Rule 9 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Order IX Rule 9 CPC restoration of suit non-prosecution sufficient cause

Shweta Sharma v. M/S. Volkswagen Finance Pvt. Ltd.

23 Feb 2015 · V.K. Shali · 2016:DHC:1517

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the repossession order under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act for non-maintainability, directing the appellant to first seek modification before the original court.

civil appeal_dismissed Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 Section 37 repossession

NTT DOCOMO INC. v. TATA SONS LIMITED

23 Feb 2015 · S. Muralidhar · 2017:DHC:2254

Delhi High Court held that RBI has no locus standi to intervene in enforcement of an arbitral award between private parties and upheld enforcement of the award and consent terms despite RBI's objections under FEMA.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral Award Enforcement Locus Standi of RBI Foreign Exchange Management Act Shareholder Agreement

NTPC Ltd. v. Patel Engineering Ltd.

21 Feb 2015 · S. Muralidhar · 2015:DHC:1661

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting the contractor reimbursement and compensation for delays and power supply failures, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 construction contract reimbursement of expenditure

Mohinder Pal Singh v. Kamalpreet Kaur Lamba and Anr.

21 Feb 2015 · Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:1662

The Delhi High Court held that a suit challenging a consent decree obtained by fraud is maintainable and cannot be dismissed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, as such issues cannot be adjudicated in execution proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed Significant consent decree fraud concealment of material facts Order VII Rule 11 CPC

Indian Teacher Training Institute & Ors v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

20 Feb 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:11576

The Delhi High Court held that teacher training institutions are entitled to have their recognition applications processed strictly as per statutory procedure with an opportunity to cure deficiencies under newly notified regulations.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant teacher education recognition statutory procedure opportunity of hearing application processing

Nareshkumar Yadav & Anr. v. Mukesh Chand Yadav

20 Feb 2015 · J. R. Midha · 2015:DHC:12009

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the Probate Court's final grant of probate operates as res judicata, barring the appellants from challenging the Will's validity in a separate suit.

civil appeal_dismissed probate Will res judicata declaration suit

Harvinder Singh Sethi v. Raj Kalra & Anr

20 Feb 2015 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2015:DHC:11685

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunctions restraining alienation of disputed properties and appointed a sole arbitrator to resolve the parties' disputes under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 interim injunction appointment of arbitrator

e384a4c71ad82bd42cecf7d831cded8ecc27fcbc75d84428f272c35260c78222

20 Feb 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:10962

The Delhi High Court held that street vendors cannot be evicted or relocated before completion of survey and certification under the Street Vendors Act, 2014, and directed municipal authorities to make the Town Vending Committee functional for dispute resolution.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Street Vendors Act 2014 Section 3(3) Town Vending Committee eviction

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. Canara Bank and Anr.

20 Feb 2015 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; R.K. GAUBA · 2015:DHC:1617-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the AAIFR's in limine dismissal of the Operating Agency's appeal, directing it to be heard on merits to ensure procedural fairness and natural justice.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Operating Agency BIFR AAIFR change of management

Hari Saran Sharma & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

20 Feb 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:1621

The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs involving neighborly disputes under Sections 452, 323, 147, 149, 34, 308, and 325 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement, applying the principles governing the exercise of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 307 IPC

Dilip Roy Choudhury v. Solution Infotech India P.Ltd.

20 Feb 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:1625

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash a Section 138 NI Act complaint at an advanced trial stage, holding that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should not be exercised to quash proceedings nearing completion.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing petition abuse of process

Kishan & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

20 Feb 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:1629

The Delhi High Court quashed two cross FIRs under Section 308 IPC based on amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR compromise Section 308 IPC

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited v. Fujitshu India Private Limited

20 Feb 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:1599-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed MTNL's appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act, upholding the arbitral award that allowed customs duty reimbursement and maintenance charges, emphasizing limited judicial interference in arbitration awards.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 arbitral award

Natwar Rateria v. CBI

20 Feb 2015 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2015:DHC:1609

The Delhi High Court held that the death of a co-accused causing abatement of proceedings does not automatically acquit the surviving accused charged with conspiracy, allowing the trial to continue.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant criminal conspiracy abatement of proceedings death of accused Section 120A IPC

V.K. Kadyan v. P.K. Gupta

20 Feb 2015 · Kailash Gambhir; I.S. Mehta · 2015:DHC:1659-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition alleging contempt against respondents for non-promotion, holding that absence of wilful disobedience precludes contempt liability.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant civil contempt wilful disobedience promotion Central Administrative Tribunal

Gauri Shanker v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi

20 Feb 2015 · G.S. Sistani · 2015:DHC:1651

The Delhi High Court quashed the cancellation of a kerosene oil depot licence due to unreasonable delay and repeated renewals, holding that the licensing authority was estopped from acting on stale material.

administrative petition_allowed Significant licence cancellation delay in action estoppel waiver

Department of Transport Government of NCT of Delhi v. M/S Star Bus Services Pvt. Ltd.

20 Feb 2015 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2015:DHC:1598

Delhi High Court dismissed the Government's petition challenging an interim order restraining penalty imposition by the appellant, directing the arbitrator to decide pending applications on the fixed hearing date.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 17 interim measures Section 23 amendment of claims Section 37 challenge to interim orders

DELHI WASTE MANAGEMENT LIMITED v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI

20 Feb 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2015:DHC:1652

The court held that advertisement rights under a concession agreement require compliance with its terms and statutory permissions, setting aside unlawful licence fee demands but upholding removal of unauthorized advertisements.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Concession Agreement Waste Storage Depots Advertisements Delhi Municipal Corporation Act 1957

Brham Prakash v. Assistance Commissioner Food & Supplies (East)

20 Feb 2015 · G.S. Sistani · 2015:DHC:1653

The Delhi High Court quashed the cancellation of a Fair Price Shop license due to inordinate delay and repeated renewals amounting to condonation, emphasizing that discretionary administrative action must be timely exercised.

administrative petition_allowed Significant license cancellation delay in administrative action condonation Clause 7 Delhi Specified Articles Order