Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
Dilip Bhaskar v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Kapil Mohan & Ors. v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine mediated settlement, applying inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Manoj Kumar & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement, applying the principles of inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Shokeen v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 308 IPC based on an amicable settlement between neighbors, applying the principles governing the exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Rajat Lal v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of an FIR under Section 406 IPC based on an amicable family settlement, emphasizing the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Shyam Sajan Arora & Ors. v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on a mediated settlement, applying the Supreme Court's guidelines on quashing criminal proceedings in family disputes.
Anil Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable matrimonial settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Vishal Gupta v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 420, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable compromise between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Surender v. State of Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 324 and 452 IPC on the basis of amicable settlement between neighbors, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Girish Bhatt & Ors. v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a mediated settlement, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Pramod Chand Mathur & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Bahadur Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Rohit Yadav v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Indian Electricity Act based on an amicable settlement and No Dues Certificate, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent futile criminal proceedings.
Shachin Arora v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on a mediated settlement, affirming the High Court's power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in such cases.
Pranshu Gupta & Ors. v. State of Govt of NCT Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a full mediated settlement, applying the principles of inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Surender Kant Sahni & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC based on a mediated settlement, affirming the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Johnson & Johnson v. Lupin Limited and Anr
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction to Johnson & Johnson restraining Lupin from using the deceptively similar trademark 'LUCYNTA' for pharmaceutical products, recognizing trans-border reputation and prior use of 'NUCYNTA' despite non-use in India.
National Highways Authority of India v. Lucknow Varanasi Tollways Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award directing NHAI to return bid security to the Respondent, holding NHAI's failure to provide the State Support Agreement a material breach justifying contract termination.