Delhi High Court

93,877 judgments

Year:

Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited v. M/S. Mesjura Sergei Vladimirivyich & Anr.

09 Mar 2015 · Najmi Waziri · 2015:DHC:2341

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction restraining unauthorized use of the registered trademark 'KETANOV' as a domain name, affirming trademark protection in ex parte proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement domain name permanent injunction passing off

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. SATYAPAL SINGH YADAV

09 Mar 2015 · C. HARI SHANKAR; AJAY DIGPAUL · 2025:DHC:487-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of departmental punishment against a police constable acquitted in criminal proceedings, holding that mere hostility of witnesses does not justify disciplinary action under Rule 12 of the Delhi Police (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1980.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Police (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1980 Rule 12 DPPAR criminal acquittal departmental proceedings

Director of Income Tax v. British Airways

05 Mar 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R. K. Gauba · 2015:DHC:11034-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeals, holding that a foreign company covered under the Indo-UK DTAA is not liable to pay interest under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, following resolution of tax disputes through mutual agreement procedures.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 234B Income Tax Act 1961 interest liability foreign company

Suresh Kumar v. Ravi Kishan & Ors.

05 Mar 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:2236

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for motor accident injuries and held that an insurer cannot avoid liability without proving conscious breach of policy terms through proper notice and evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor vehicular accident compensation enhancement insurance liability willful breach

ICICI Lombard GIC Ltd v. Vishal Hira Merchants Pvt Ltd & Ors.

05 Mar 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.K. Gauba · 2015:DHC:2233-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the DRT and DRAT orders directing an insurer to deposit amounts in bank recovery proceedings, holding that without determined liability, such a direction is unsustainable.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Debt Recovery Tribunal Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal SARFAESI Act Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act

Tara Chand v. State of NCT of Delhi

05 Mar 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:2228

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of cheating in a real estate transaction, quashing non-bailable warrants subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation and furnishing bank guarantees.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. cheating forgery

Tara Chand v. State of NCT of Delhi

05 Mar 2015 · Manmohan Singh, J. · 2015:DHC:2229

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of cheating in a real estate transaction, imposing conditions including bank guarantees and cooperation with investigation, and quashed non-bailable warrants and coercive processes against them.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. cheating forgery

Tara Chand v. State of NCT of Delhi

05 Mar 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:2231

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of cheating and forgery in a large financial dispute, imposing conditions including bank guarantees and cooperation with investigation, while quashing non-bailable warrants and coercive processes.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. cheating criminal breach of trust

Rekha Sharma v. Central Bureau of Investigation

05 Mar 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:2185-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of political and bureaucratic accused for conspiring to forge recruitment award lists in a JBT teacher scam under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Forgery Criminal Conspiracy Prevention of Corruption Act Recruitment Scam

Tara Chand v. State of NCT of Delhi

05 Mar 2015 · Manmohan Singh, J. · 2015:DHC:2230

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to accused in a large-scale cheating case involving real estate transactions, quashing non-bailable warrants subject to cooperation and security conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail cheating criminal breach of trust forgery

Tara Chand v. State of NCT of Delhi

05 Mar 2015 · Manmohan Singh, J. · 2015:DHC:2226

Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners in a large-scale cheating and forgery case involving property and share transactions, imposing conditions including bank guarantees and quashing non-bailable warrants.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. cheating forgery

Tara Chand v. State of NCT of Delhi

05 Mar 2015 · Manmohan Singh, J. · 2015:DHC:2227

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of cheating and forgery in a property investment dispute, quashing coercive orders subject to conditions including bank guarantees and cooperation with investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail cheating criminal breach of trust forgery

Gianwati Taxak v. The University of Delhi & Ors.

05 Mar 2015 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2015:DHC:2225

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging suspension and departmental proceedings of a college employee, holding that suspension extensions complied with applicable rules and charge-sheet could not be quashed at initial stage despite allegations of bias.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant suspension departmental proceedings charge-sheet CCS(CCA) Rules

SUNWORLD INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. v. ITO WARD 24 (3), NEW DELHI

05 Mar 2015 · BADAR DURREZ AHMED; SANJEEV SACHDEVA · 2015:DHC:2220-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a notice under Section 143(2) issued beyond the prescribed limitation period by the officer having jurisdiction is time barred and quashed the notice issued to the petitioner.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 143(2) Income Tax Act time barred notice jurisdiction transfer of assessment records

Shri Roop Chand Gupta v. Delhi Vidyut Board

05 Mar 2015 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2015:DHC:2232

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging disciplinary orders imposing penalty on an Assistant Engineer for granting tube well electricity connections without mandatory technical feasibility and genuineness reports, holding the disciplinary findings and procedure valid.

administrative petition_dismissed disciplinary proceedings technical feasibility report genuineness of load tube well electricity connections

ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Chander Pal Singh & Ors.

05 Mar 2015 · G.P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:2237

The Delhi High Court held that a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cannot suo moto convert a claim under Section 166 to Section 163-A without consent and must frame negligence issues before awarding compensation, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 Section 163-A insurance liability

The New India Ins. Co. Ltd. v. Bimlesh & Ors.

05 Mar 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:2235

The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident compensation award, rejecting insurer’s appeal and affirming liability absent proof of willful policy breach and improper addition of future prospects without evidence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim compensation future prospects loss of dependency

Deere and Co. and Anr v. S. Harcharan Singh and Anr

05 Mar 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:2239

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction protecting the well-known 'John Deere' trademark and distinctive green and yellow trade dress against defendants' infringing use on agricultural equipment, recognizing the plaintiffs' exclusive rights under the Trademarks Act, 1999.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement trade dress well-known trademark colour mark

Rajesh Gupta v. Harish Gupta & Ors.

05 Mar 2015 · JAYANT NATH, J. · 2015:DHC:2238

The Delhi High Court held that in a partition suit, a plaintiff claiming possession of part of the property is liable to pay fixed court fees, and the plaint cannot be rejected for inadequate court fees based on interim possession findings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partition suit court fee Order 7 Rule 11 CPC possession

Rekha Sharma v. Central Bureau of Investigation

05 Mar 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:2179-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of multiple accused including political and bureaucratic figures for conspiring to forge and manipulate recruitment award lists in a large-scale JBT teachers scam under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Forgery Criminal Conspiracy Prevention of Corruption Act Recruitment Scam