Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
Shikha Makkar & Anr. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Sections 420, 406, 506, 120-B, and 34 IPC, holding that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC should not be exercised when an alternate remedy exists before the trial court.
Raj Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of an FIR under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act based on amicable settlement between parties, applying the principles governing inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Bikram Singh Negi & Anr. v. State of Delhi (NCT) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Neeraj Kumar v. Delhi Police and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a police recruitment candidature by the Screening Committee due to criminal antecedents despite acquittal by benefit of doubt, emphasizing the need for impeccable character in police service.
Solitaire Ventures Pvt Ltd v. Vipul SEZ Developers Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court restricted interim reliefs under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act to the Revised Project Land as per the MOU, directing disputes beyond that to arbitration and declining broader injunctions or receiver appointment.
Solitaire Ventures Pvt Ltd v. Vipul SEZ Developers Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court restricted interim reliefs under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act to the revised project land as per the MOU, directing disputes on broader claims to arbitration and modifying status quo orders accordingly.
Solitaire Ventures Pvt Ltd v. Vipul SEZ Developers Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court limited interim reliefs under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act to the Revised Project Land as per the MOU, directing disputes to arbitration and refusing expansive injunctions or receiver appointment.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Dhan Laxmi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeals, holding that without proof of conscious and willful breach and proper notice to the insured, the insurer cannot recover compensation paid on account of a fake driving licence.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Dhan Laxmi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an insurer cannot recover compensation paid from the insured without proving a conscious and willful breach of policy terms and issuing proper notice, dismissing the insurer's appeals based on an alleged fake driving license.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Dhan Laxmi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeals, holding that without proof of conscious and willful breach and notice to the insured, the insurer cannot recover compensation paid due to the driver's fake licence.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Dhan Laxmi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an insurer cannot recover compensation from the insured without proving a conscious and willful breach of policy terms and issuing proper notice, dismissing the insurer's appeals based on an alleged fake driving licence.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Dhan Laxmi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an insurer cannot recover compensation paid from the insured without proving conscious and willful breach of policy terms, dismissing the insurer's appeal based on the driver's alleged fake licence.
Jayjeet Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court held that revision petitions under Section 397 CrPC cannot be dismissed on limitation grounds when clear illegality exists, and allowed condonation of delay to decide the matter on merits.
Prabhudayal Batra v. M/S Shreyans Buildwell Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that delay in filing leave to defend in eviction proceedings under Section 14(1)(e) DRC Act cannot be condoned and that eviction under this section applies only to residential premises, not commercial use.
Subhash Chandra Agrawal v. Office of the Attorney General of India
The Delhi High Court held that the Office of the Attorney General of India is a 'public authority' under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act, setting aside the CIC's order denying information on that ground.
Subhash Chandra Agrawal v. Office of the Attorney General of India
The Delhi High Court held that the Office of the Attorney General of India is a 'public authority' under the RTI Act, setting aside the CIC's contrary order and remanding the matter for reconsideration.
TAJ TELEVISION INDIA PVT LTD v. FASTWAY TRANSMISSION INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld TDSAT's interim order directing a broadcaster to supply TV channel signals to a distributor despite piracy allegations, emphasizing that such allegations require conclusive proof after trial before relief can be denied.
Manohar Lal v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that extension of service to a National Awardee Principal under Rule 110(3) and relevant Notifications is valid even if the award is conferred during re-employment after superannuation, dismissing the appellant's challenge.
Sunil Gupta v. Nargis Khanna
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's applications to amend the plaint and implead necessary parties in a partition suit, holding that amendments necessary for resolving the real controversy should be permitted without deciding merits or limitation at the amendment stage.
M/S KIRIT FILMS PVT. LTD. & ANR. v. M/S EAGLE THEATERS AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiffs' application to amend the plaint's prayer clause to limit relief to the 2008 lease renewal period, holding that amendments necessary for deciding real controversies should be permitted without examining merits or limitation at the amendment stage.