Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd v. Sandeep Kumar and Another
The Delhi High Court dismissed defendant's application for leave to defend, holding that the borrower remains liable to repay the housing loan despite builder's default and cancellation of allotment.
Vijay Verma v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of a company director in a service tax evasion case as premature, emphasizing the need for prior arrest permission and rejecting directions for prior notice before arrest in economic offences.
M K Jaswani & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 427, 448, 453, 511, and 34 IPC based on a genuine settlement between parties, applying Supreme Court guidelines on quashing criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC.
Rajinder Prasad Goyal v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of pre-arrest bail granted to accused persons, holding that pending interrogation and a civil nature observation do not justify bail cancellation if the accused cooperate with the investigation.
Jasmeet Chadha & Ors. v. NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial-related FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Nasir Ali & Anr v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 323, 308, 341, 452, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between neighbors, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Mahavir Singh v. State of (NCT) Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition seeking quashing of an FIR under Sections 308/34 IPC on the basis of settlement, allowing investigation to complete and directing the prosecution to file the final report.
Siddharth Girdhar & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a full amicable settlement, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC in line with Supreme Court precedents.
Rajinder Paul Mohindra & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420 and 120-B IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Sham Sunder v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s application to recall and briefly cross-examine witnesses under Section 311 Cr.P.C., holding that a change of counsel alone is not a ground to deny such opportunity if it prevents miscarriage of justice.
Gulab Bothra v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of an FIR and held that the trial must be conducted in Bikaner where the substantial cause of action arose, despite transfer of related matrimonial proceedings to Delhi.
Munna Lal and Ors. v. Central Public Works Department
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking protection against termination and equal wages for contract workers, holding that the remedy lies before the Industrial Tribunal and not under writ jurisdiction.
DD GEARS LTD. v. DD GEARS EMPLOYEES UNION
The Delhi High Court held that a lock out consequent to an illegal strike is not illegal under Section 24(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act and set aside the award granting wages from September 1, 2000, denying entitlement to wages from January 13, 2000.
DD GEARS LTD. v. DD GEARS EMPLOYEES UNION
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's finding that the lock out declared due to an illegal strike was lawful, denied workers wages from the lock out date, and modified the award accordingly.
D.D. Gears Limited v. Labour Commissioner Cum Secretary (Labour)
The Delhi High Court set aside the Labour Commissioner's non-speaking order rejecting closure permission under Section 25-O(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act for failure to conduct proper enquiry and record reasons, directing compliance with statutory provisions.
Jaydeep Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Army to reconsider a candidate's claim under the 'Relationship Category' despite discrepancies in the recorded mother's name, emphasizing fair application of recruitment policy.
SELCO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED v. NATIONAL BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTION & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for default and non-prosecution due to failure to file evidence and non-appearance despite court orders.
M/S SMS AAMW TOLLWAYS PVT LTD v. SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court permitted the plaintiff to withdraw the suit under Section 151 CPC with liberty to initiate fresh proceedings if the dispute remains unresolved by the High Level Committee.
Gyan Prakash v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Revisional Court's remand of Section 145 Cr.P.C. proceedings to the Magistrate for proper consideration of the tenant's case, dismissing the landlord's petition.
Sandeep Saigal & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC based on a full settlement between parties, applying the principles under Section 482 CrPC.