Delhi High Court

80,866 judgments

Year:

Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd

16 Mar 2000 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:7115-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld that pension payments for voluntary retirees under DISCOMs’ SVRS are payable by the DISCOMs, not the Pension Trust, and clarified the computation of qualifying service under CCS Pension Rules.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme Pension Trust liability CCS Pension Rules 1972 Qualifying service

Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd

16 Mar 2000 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:7116-DB

The Delhi High Court held that pensionary benefits under Special Voluntary Retirement Schemes are payable by DISCOMS, not the Pension Trust, clarified qualifying service calculations under CCS Pension Rules, and upheld the necessity of Arbitral Tribunals to determine liabilities.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme Pension Trust liability CCS Pension Rules 1972 Qualifying service

Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd

16 Mar 2000 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:7117-DB

The Delhi High Court held that pension benefits for employees opting for Special Voluntary Retirement Schemes are not payable from the Pension Trust, mandated constitution of arbitral tribunals to determine additional employer contributions, and clarified the computation of qualifying service under CCS Pension Rules.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme Pension Trust Delhi Electricity Reforms Act CCS Pension Rules 1972

Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd

16 Mar 2000 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:7118-DB

The Delhi High Court held that pension liabilities for employees opting for Special Voluntary Retirement Schemes by electricity DISCOMS are not payable from the Pension Trust but initially by DISCOMS, and clarified the correct interpretation of qualifying service and pension rules under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme CCS Pension Rules 1972 Rule 48-B qualifying service

Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd

16 Mar 2000 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:7119-DB

The Delhi High Court held that pension liability for employees opting for Special Voluntary Retirement Schemes lies with the DISCOMS, not the Pension Trust, clarified qualifying service calculations under CCS Pension Rules, and upheld the necessity of Arbitral Tribunals to determine additional contributions.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme Pension Trust liability CCS Pension Rules 1972 qualifying service

Vishal v. The State

29 Feb 2000 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:780-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to unreliable last-seen evidence and discrepancies in recovery and motive, emphasizing the need for corroboration in circumstantial cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant last-seen evidence Section 302 IPC murder recovery of weapon

st July, 2017 INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH & ANR. ..... Through Mr.Gagan Mathur & Mr.Varun Kumar, Advocates. v. SHRI LAXMI NARAYAN MEENA .....

03 Feb 2000 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI; HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA... · 2017:DHC:4090-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of delayed reversion orders reverting employees to lower grades, holding that long acquiescence and known qualifications preclude retrospective reversion.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant category bar removal Technical Service Rules promotion reversion orders

Ashok Kumar v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

30 Dec 1999 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that AICTE clarifications imposing a first class Master's degree requirement cannot retrospectively deny promotion rights under the original 1999 circular, allowing petitioners' promotion to Lecturer (Selection Grade).

administrative appeal_allowed Significant AICTE circular 1999 Lecturer Selection Grade promotion eligibility first class Master's degree

ST MARKS SR SEC PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR v. DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ORS

15 Dec 1999 · HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO; V. KAMESWAR RAO, J · 2017:DHC:1610

The Delhi High Court upheld the Director of Education's order invalidating a 15% tuition fee increase for air conditioning expenses and affirmed the requirement for schools to maintain a separate depreciation reserve fund account before charging development fees.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tuition fee development fee depreciation reserve fund Delhi School Education Act, 1973

Council of the Instt. of Chartered Accountants of India v. Kailash Chander Agarwal & Anr.

13 Nov 1999 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Yogesh Khanna · 2017:DHC:719-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld disciplinary action removing a Chartered Accountant from the professional register for five years for issuing misleading certificates without verifying actual receipt of share money.

professional_regulation petition_allowed Significant Chartered Accountant Preferential Shares Due Diligence Certificate Cheque Encashment

Mr. Shivam Tiwari v. Rohtash Kumar

05 Jul 1999 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1470-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition and set aside the Tribunal's order permitting belated pay refixation under the ACP Scheme, holding that the option had to be exercised within the prescribed time and delay barred the claim.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme pay refixation delay and laches acquiescence

Ram Kishore & Another v. State

06 Mar 1999 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:1283-DB

The Delhi High Court modified the appellants' conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC based on the nature of evidence and injuries, directing their release on the period already undergone.

criminal sentence_modified Significant hostile witnesses common intention Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part II IPC

Silicon Graphics Systems India Private Ltd v. M/S Sterling & Wilson Electricals Private Ltd

20 Jan 1999 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:6340-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the majority arbitral award directing refund of liquidated damages, holding that the owner's conduct waived delay penalties and limitation began upon quantification of damages.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant liquidated damages arbitral award cause of action limitation

Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited v. Rampal

15 Oct 1998 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2020:DHC:2189

The Delhi High Court held that a forum not properly constituted as a Permanent Lok Adalat under the Legal Services Authorities Act lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes or grant interim relief in electricity misuse cases, setting aside the impugned order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Permanent Lok Adalat Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 Electricity Act, 2003 Section 138 Electricity Act

Amit Jain & Ors. v. State & Anr.

15 Oct 1998 · Navin Chawla, J. · 2024:DHC:2069

The Delhi High Court set aside the summoning order in a cheating case related to a falsified arbitral award, emphasizing the need for prima facie evidence and proper consideration of offence ingredients before issuing summons.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant summoning order Section 420 IPC arbitral award falsification

Amrik Singh Suri v. Harminder Singh Suri

11 Oct 1998 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:1139-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award holding that findings of unaccounted Die Steel and compensation fixed without evidentiary basis were legally unsustainable.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitral award Die Steel partnership dispute accounting irregularities

Amrik Singh Suri v. Harminder Singh Suri

11 Oct 1998 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:1138-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the setting aside of an arbitration award that was found to be based on conjecture and lacking evidentiary support regarding unaccounted Die Steel in a partnership dispute.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration award perversity unaccounted stock Die Steel

Rajesh Gomes v. New Delhi Municipal Council

08 Oct 1998 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:254-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the denial of retrospective regularization as driver, holding that regularization is valid only from the date of passing the Trade Test and approval by the Selection Committee as per prior court orders.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant regularization Trade Test Temporary Muster Roll Regular Muster Roll

Luvleen Maingi v. Union of India

24 Sep 1998 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:9319-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 25

The Delhi High Court held that gold jewellery worn by a foreign national on arrival in India is personal effects exempt from customs duty and cannot be confiscated without statutory basis, quashing the confiscation order.

customs petition_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Baggage Rules Personal jewellery Foreign national

Nilkamal Crates and Containers & Anr. v. Ms. Reena Rajpal & Anr.

01 Sep 1998 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:8087

The court held that while the word marks NILKAMAL and NILKRANTI are not deceptively similar, the defendants' device mark is deceptively similar to the plaintiffs' device mark, granting injunction against the device mark's use but not against the word mark NILKRANTI.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off deceptive similarity trade marks act 1999