Delhi High Court

80,866 judgments

Year:

b3cffcc0c709074263bec75006f5a0b453921cf9d60bea91c2db97cc1445a45e

20 Sep 2012 · S. Muralidhar · 2017:DHC:8935-DB

The Court dismissed appeals challenging the deletion of penalty under Sections 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act imposed on Sahara Indian Financial Corporation Ltd., affirming the ITAT's order.

tax appeal_dismissed Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 271D Section 271E penalty deletion

S.P. Sharma v. IFCI Ltd. & Anr.

11 Sep 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:6769-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a termination letter citing 'lapses committed' is stigmatic, requiring a prior inquiry, and quashed the termination of a probationer’s service without such inquiry.

labor appeal_allowed Significant stigmatic termination probationer service termination natural justice reputation as legal right

Sanjeev Sharma v. The State

11 Sep 2012 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:475
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer of a criminal case from Saket Court to Patiala House Courts based on territorial jurisdiction as per government notification.

criminal appeal_allowed transfer petition territorial jurisdiction Patiala House Courts Munirka

F.HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD & ANR v. CIPLA LTD

07 Sep 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:9674-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld Roche's patent validity for Erlotinib Hydrochloride but held Cipla's polymorph B product did not infringe, clarifying inventive step and Section 3(d) standards under Indian patent law.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Inventive step Section 3(d) Patents Act Patent infringement Polymorphs

F.HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD & ANR v. CIPLA LTD

07 Sep 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:9677-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld Roche's patent validity but held Cipla's polymorph B product does not infringe, clarifying inventive step and Section 3(d) standards in pharmaceutical patents.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Inventive step Section 3(d) Patent infringement Polymorphs

Amit Kumar v. Union of India and Ors

30 Aug 2012 · C. Hari Shankar; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:9041-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 6

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition and directed appointment of the petitioner after forensic examination confirmed his thumb impressions matched, overruling earlier rejection based on handwriting mismatch.

administrative petition_allowed Significant forensic expert report handwriting mismatch thumb impression natural justice

Himani Malhotra v. Indraprastha College for Women and Anr

21 Aug 2012 · Anu Malhotra · 2017:DHC:3762

The Delhi High Court held that a suspended teacher cannot be arbitrarily denied permission to attend UGC Orientation and Refresher courses and directed the college to issue the necessary No Objection Certificate and attest application forms.

administrative petition_allowed Significant suspension No Objection Certificate Orientation Programme Refresher Course

Union of India v. Anand Mohan Sharan

26 Jul 2012 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:7900-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 22

The Delhi High Court held that the Disciplinary Authority's order remitting a disciplinary matter for fresh inquiry without proper reasons and in violation of procedural rules was unsustainable and set aside the order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969 Disciplinary Authority Inquiry Officer Central Vigilance Commission

Hindustan Zinc Ltd v. Durha Construction Pvt Ltd

17 Jul 2012 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2021:DHC:697

The Delhi High Court upheld striking off the appellant's defence for wilful non-compliance with a discovery order under Order 11 Rule 12 CPC, emphasizing the obligation to produce relevant documents and the consequences of contumacious conduct.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant discovery order Order 11 Rule 12 CPC Order 11 Rule 21 CPC striking off defence

S. L. Saini v. Gyanender Bharti & Ors.

17 May 2012 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:2261

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against the Delhi Jal Board and GNCTD, holding that no wilful disobedience occurred as the land acquisition process under the 2013 LA Act is underway in accordance with law.

administrative petition_dismissed contempt of court land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 wilful disobedience

Deepak Verma v. Union of India & Ors.

01 May 2012 · Sanjiv Khanna; Navin Chawla · 2017:DHC:6388-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 8

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of an Officer Cadet's reinstatement request as time barred and affirmed that a resignation accepted by the competent military authority is final and cannot be withdrawn.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant resignation reinstatement Officers Training Academy military training

Shail Attrey v. Govt of India and Ors.

27 Apr 2012 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:891-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order fixing pay of a retired Army officer absorbed in DRDO, holding that personal pay can substitute rank pay within the civilian pay scale to avoid pecuniary loss.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant pay fixation rank pay personal pay Central Administrative Tribunal

Union of India v. M/S Vishva Shanti Builders (India) Pvt Ltd

27 Apr 2012 · Jasmeet Singh · 2024:DHC:5467
Cites 2 · Cited by 5

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award allowing contractor claims despite a No Claim Certificate signed under protest, emphasizing limited grounds for setting aside awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 No Claim Certificate Arbitrability of claims

Reliance Communications Limited v. Unique Identification Authority of India

20 Apr 2012 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5172
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award interpreting contract billing terms as payment based on aggregate call duration divided by 60 seconds and affirmed the arbitrator's power to remand SLA deduction issues for reconsideration after natural justice violations.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge contract interpretation connect minutes

Sant Lal v. State

15 Apr 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:3638-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Sant Lal for murdering his maternal uncle based on consistent circumstantial evidence, proper proof of post-mortem report, and call detail records, dismissing his appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder Section 302 IPC circumstantial evidence post-mortem report

Navratan Baid v. Neetu Baid

12 Mar 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Yogesh Khanna · 2017:DHC:693-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted divorce on grounds of cruelty, emphasizing equal treatment of spouses regarding infidelity and mental cruelty and recognizing irretrievable breakdown of marriage.

family appeal_allowed Significant cruelty divorce mental cruelty irretrievable breakdown

Lt. Col. Archana Shukla v. Union of India

24 Feb 2012 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2021:DHC:2776-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 9

The Delhi High Court upheld the Supreme Court's 60% benchmark for Permanent Commission and dismissed petitions seeking stay of release of women officers assessed under the UAC appraisal system.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Permanent Commission Women Officers Unit Assessment Card (UAC) Annual Confidential Report (ACR)

Krishan Gopal Bakshi v. Delhi Development Authority

13 Feb 2012 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2018:DHC:2133

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking allotment of a flat under the closed NPRS-79 scheme due to delay and laches, holding that no mandamus can be issued after scheme closure and inordinate delay.

property petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Development Authority New Pattern Registration Scheme 1979 Janta flat allotment mandamus

Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Vishambar Dayal

31 Jan 2012 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025 SCC OnLine Del
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order reinstating a police constable dismissed for submitting a false caste certificate, holding that departmental proceedings are barred after criminal acquittal unless specific exceptions under Rule 12 of the Delhi Police Rules apply.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Police Rules Rule 12 DPPAR criminal acquittal departmental proceedings

Vanshika v. University of Delhi & Anr.

03 Jan 2012 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:1236
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court held that a student eligible but unable to appear in first semester exams due to fee payment failure must be allowed to continue studies and appear in subsequent exams when permitted by university authorities.

administrative petition_allowed Significant university admission eligibility vs entitlement examination candidature estoppel