Delhi High Court
81,561 judgments
Indira Gandhi National Open University v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside the Industrial Tribunal's award directing reinstatement of contract workers, holding that the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by declaring the contract sham without specific reference and that the workers were employees of the contractor, not the principal employer.
Indira Gandhi National Open University v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside the Industrial Tribunal’s award directing reinstatement of contract workers as employees of the principal employer, holding that the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by deciding on the sham nature of the contract without specific reference and that the workers failed to prove employer-employee relationship with the petitioner.
Deva Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Sections 392 and 397 IPC, ruling that displaying a deadly weapon to create terror suffices for Section 397 even without actual injury.
Indira Gandhi National Open University v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside a Labour Tribunal award reinstating contract workers as employees of the principal employer, holding the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by deciding on sham contract issues beyond the terms of reference and affirming the absence of employer-employee relationship.
Indira Gandhi National Open University v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside the reinstatement award to contract workers, holding that the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by deciding on sham contract issues not referred and affirmed that the workers were employees of the contractor, not the principal employer.
Indira Gandhi National Open University v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the Industrial Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by declaring the contract sham without specific reference and affirmed that the petitioner was not the employer of the contract workers, setting aside the reinstatement award.
Southern Petrochemical Industries Corporation Ltd v. The Great Eastern Shipping Co Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award on remand, holding that courts cannot interfere with factual findings of an arbitral tribunal under Section 34 unless the award is perverse or violates fundamental policy of Indian law.
Alok Kumar Ranjan v. State of NCT Delhi; Rama Arora v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed petitions to quash FIRs under Sections 279/337 and 279/323/34 IPC on the basis of amicable settlement between parties, applying the principles laid down by the Supreme Court under Section 482 CrPC.
Sanjay Ganglola v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A, 313, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, applying principles of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Ankur Chadha & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 498A, and 34 IPC based on a mediated settlement and no objection affidavit, subject to conditional payment of compensation.
Rashid M H Jung v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed the trial court's order declining to summon an accused and directing personal appearance, upholding the earlier exemption and directing expeditious hearing on the point of charge.
Sanjay Ganglola v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A, 313, 506, and 34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement, reaffirming the scope of Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice in such cases.
Alok Kumar Ranjan v. State of NCT Delhi; Rama Arora v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from a trivial dispute between legal professionals based on their amicable settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Virender @ Veeru v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder convictions of appellants based on credible sole eyewitness testimony despite inconclusive ballistic evidence and delay in FIR registration.
Ashish Kumar @ George Bush v. State
The Delhi High Court suspended the appellant's sentence and granted bail pending appeal in a robbery case involving procedural irregularities and evidentiary doubts.
Anuradha Bansal v. Pramod Kumar and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted an injunction restraining defendants from alienating disputed properties pending the outcome of a related probate petition, thereby protecting the plaintiff's interests.
Sanjay Ganglola v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A, 313, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Dr.Jose Verghese, Mr.Ashwani K.Sakhuja and Mr.Puneet Saini, Advocates. v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR .....
The Delhi High Court dismissed Mount Carmel School Society's appeal seeking stay of construction on disputed land, holding the matter barred by res judicata and no prima facie case for injunction.
Dr.Jose Verghese, Mr.Ashwani K.Sakhuja and Mr.Puneet Saini, Advocates. v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR .....
The Delhi High Court dismissed Mount Carmel School Society's appeal and contempt petition, holding that prior final orders on land allotment bar further challenge and that construction commenced before status quo order cannot be restrained.