Delhi High Court

81,561 judgments

Year:

Sh. Kamal Kishore & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

05 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:6245

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes Section 498A IPC

Sonia & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

05 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:6248

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 380, 448, 451, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, affirming the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to quash non-compoundable offences when justice so requires.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR settlement between parties non-compoundable offences

Gautam R Patel v. State & Anr

05 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:6278

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 195-A and 506 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between neighbors, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC compromise in criminal cases non-heinous offences

Rajkumar @ Ram Ladhete Yadav & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

05 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:6243

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR involving serious offences under IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties at the investigation stage, applying the inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC with caution.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences settlement between parties

Chander Prakash @ Rinku & Ors. v. NCT of Delhi & Anr.

05 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:6246

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, 323, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon amicable settlement and mutual divorce, affirming the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to do so in such cases.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes Section 498A IPC

Manmeet Singh v. The State & Anr

05 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:6281

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement, applying the inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC

Ashwani Kumar Dua v. Delhi State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited

05 Aug 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:6282-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a seniority list and reversion order due to inordinate delay and laches, affirming that unexplained delay bars equitable relief in service matters.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant writ petition delay and laches seniority list reversion order

Vinod Kumar & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

05 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:6283

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable mediated settlement, applying the principles of inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute mediated settlement

Indira Gandhi National Open University v. Union of India & Anr

05 Aug 2015 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2015:DHC:6261

The Delhi High Court set aside a Labour Tribunal award reinstating contract workers as employees of the principal employer, holding that the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by deciding on sham contract issues not referred to it and that the workers failed to prove employer-employee relationship with the petitioner.

labor appeal_allowed Significant employer-employee relationship contract labour industrial dispute Labour Tribunal jurisdiction

Nar Singh Prasad Roy v. Union of India & Ors.

05 Aug 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:6284-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a claimant for freedom fighter pension under the SSS Scheme due to failure to meet strict documentary and evidentiary requirements prescribed by the scheme.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme freedom fighter pension secondary evidence Non-Availability of Records Certificate

M/S VIJAY STEEL TUBES & FITTINGS PVT LTD v. M/S APOLLO PIPES LTD

05 Aug 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:6285-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is not maintainable against a company already ordered to be wound up before cheque presentation, and quashed the complaint and summoning order accordingly.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act company winding up liquidation quashing of complaint

Rahul Prasad Singh v. The State

05 Aug 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:6287-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused charged with murder and robbery, holding that strong prima facie evidence including call records and recovery of stolen property justified denial of bail despite absence of matching fingerprints.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail Section 439 CrPC Section 27 Evidence Act disclosure statement

Indira Gandhi National Open University v. Union of India

05 Aug 2015 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2015:DHC:6252

The Delhi High Court set aside a Labour Tribunal award reinstating contract workers as employees of the principal employer, holding that the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by deciding on sham contract issues beyond the terms of reference.

labor appeal_allowed Significant employer-employee relationship contract labour industrial dispute terms of reference

E2 Labs Information Security Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Roberto Preatoni & Ors.

05 Aug 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:6273

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for default and non-prosecution due to the plaintiffs' failure to file required affidavits and to provide instructions to their counsel despite repeated opportunities.

civil petition_dismissed default dismissal non-prosecution Section 65-B Evidence Act ex-parte proceedings

Firdaus Amin v. Huma Mirza & Ors.

05 Aug 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:6269

The Delhi High Court decreed the suit and disposed of it on the basis of a registered Partition Deed reflecting an amicable settlement between the parties.

civil appeal_allowed Partition Deed Out-of-court settlement Suit property Decree on settlement

Indira Gandhi National Open University v. Union of India & Anr

05 Aug 2015 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2015:DHC:6262

The Delhi High Court held that the Industrial Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by declaring the contract sham without specific reference and that the workmen failed to prove employer-employee relationship with the petitioner, setting aside the reinstatement award.

labor appeal_allowed Significant employer-employee relationship contract labour industrial dispute terms of reference

Indira Gandhi National Open University v. Union of India & Anr

05 Aug 2015 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2015:DHC:6263

The Delhi High Court set aside the Industrial Tribunal's award reinstating contract workers as employees of the principal employer, holding that the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by deciding on the sham nature of the contract without specific reference and that the workers were employees of the contractor, not the petitioner.

labor appeal_allowed Significant employer-employee relationship industrial dispute contract labour sham contract

Indira Gandhi National Open University v. Union of India & Anr

05 Aug 2015 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2015:DHC:6264

The Delhi High Court set aside a Labour Tribunal award reinstating contract workers as employees of the principal employer, holding that the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by declaring the contract sham without specific reference and that the workers failed to prove employer-employee relationship with the petitioner.

labor appeal_allowed Significant employer-employee relationship contract labour industrial dispute Labour Tribunal jurisdiction

Rajesh Kumar Agrahari Trading as Agrahari Masala Udyog v. Subhash Masala Industries

05 Aug 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:6268

The Delhi High Court disposed of a copyright infringement suit concerning packaging design based on a settlement where the defendant agreed to alter the disputed color combination to distinguish its product.

civil settled copyright infringement packaging design settlement color combination

Indira Gandhi National Open University v. Union of India & Anr

05 Aug 2015 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2015:DHC:6253

The Delhi High Court held that the Industrial Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by declaring the contract sham without specific reference and affirmed that the workman was employed by the contractor, not the petitioner, setting aside the reinstatement award.

labor appeal_allowed Significant employer-employee relationship contract labour industrial dispute terms of reference