Delhi High Court

79,582 judgments

Year:

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central II) v. Mayank Traders (P) Ltd.

20 Aug 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:11397-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld that income tax assessments under Section 153A cannot be validly framed against an entity that has ceased to exist due to amalgamation prior to the initiation of proceedings.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 153A Income Tax Act assessment against non-existent entity amalgamation Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Monika Yadav v. University Grant Commission & Ors.

20 Aug 2015 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:11538

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging refusal of Ph.D. admission, holding that the expert academic committee's decision was final and not tainted by mala fide.

academic_admission petition_dismissed Ph.D. admission mala fide Department Research Committee thesis synopsis

Ms. Rajsree Ajay v. M/s National Highways Authority of India

20 Aug 2015 · J.R. Midha · 2015:DHC:11901

The Delhi High Court dismissed execution petitions as withdrawn following an amicable settlement between the decree holder and judgment debtor.

civil appeal_dismissed execution petition decree holder judgment debtor amicable settlement

Lav Kush v. State

20 Aug 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:6781-DB

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to an accused not named in the FIR but arrested for driving a vehicle used in the alleged offence, finding no evidence of tampering or witness intimidation.

criminal appeal_allowed bail Section 439 CrPC not named in FIR vehicle driver

Ravi Prakash v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Another

20 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:6770

The Delhi High Court held that a single blow causing grievous head injury without evidence of intention or knowledge to cause death does not warrant framing of charge under Section 308 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 308 IPC grievous injury intention to cause death charge framing

Satish Mehta v. Sasken Communication Technologies & Ors.

20 Aug 2015 · Gita Mittal; I. S. Mehta · 2015:DHC:6785-DB

The Delhi High Court held that orders for arrest and civil imprisonment in execution proceedings must comply with mandatory procedural safeguards under Order XXI CPC, and set aside non-bailable warrants issued without such compliance.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Execution proceedings Order XXI CPC Civil imprisonment Notice to show cause

Krishna Devi and Others v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr

20 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:6772

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

LRS Institute of Tuberculosis & Allied Diseases v. Shri Babu Lal

20 Aug 2015 · Sunita Gupta · 2015:DHC:6771

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court’s award holding the termination of a workman illegal due to violation of natural justice in enquiry and granted partial backwages and compensation.

labor petition_dismissed Significant industrial dispute termination of service departmental enquiry natural justice

Jamia Hamdard (Deemed University) v. Union of India

20 Aug 2015 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:6766

The Delhi High Court held that the Union of India had granted renewal of permission to the petitioners' medical college subject to an undertaking, which was fulfilled, and set aside the subsequent refusal, clarifying the scope of opportunity to rectify deficiencies under Section 10A of the Indian Medical Council Act.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 Section 10A Medical College renewal Medical Council of India

Mahaboob Khan v. Union of India

19 Aug 2015 · Kailash Gambhir; Najmi Waziri · 2015:DHC:11477-DB

The Delhi High Court held that adverse Non Qualifying Service entries made without notice during ab-initio training cannot bar appointment to Sub Inspector posts, directing appointment of petitioners who otherwise qualified.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Non Qualifying Service Natural Justice Ab-initio Training Standing Order No. 01/2010

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I v. M/S Yashpal Narender Kumar

19 Aug 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:11395-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's delayed appeals against deletion of protective income tax additions, holding such additions unsustainable when the substantive additions to related parties are deleted.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act Section 153C Section 132(4)(A) protective addition

Navneesh Pan War v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr

19 Aug 2015 · Indermeet Kaur · 2015:DHC:11297

The Delhi High Court quashed two cross FIRs arising from a settled neighbourly dispute, subject to costs payable to the State for investigation expenses.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR cross FIRs settlement between parties neighbour dispute

Central Board of Trustees, EPF v. ERA Infra Engineering Ltd

19 Aug 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:11279-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the EPF Board's appeals, upholding the Single Judge's interim stay on deposit orders under Section 7Q of the EPF Act pending hearing of writ petitions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Employees Provident Fund Section 7Q pre-condition deposit ad-interim stay

PAARDARSHITA PUBLIC WELFARE FOUNDATION v. COMMISSIONER SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

19 Aug 2015 · CHIEF JUSTICE; JAYANT NATH, J · 2015:DHC:6733-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking directions to stop all unauthorized medical establishments in residential areas, holding that the Supreme Court's judgment in Anirudh Kumar is fact-specific and does not mandate general enforcement action.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Public Interest Litigation Regularization Certificate Master Plan of Delhi 2021 Unauthorized medical establishments

Balbir Singh Khullar & Anr v. State & Ors

19 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:6745

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 420, and 120-B IPC based on a mutual settlement, applying the principles governing the exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC in non-heinous criminal cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR settlement between parties inherent powers of High Court

SMT AMRAPALI SINGHEE v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

19 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:6744

The Delhi High Court held that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should not be exercised to quash criminal proceedings before the trial court frames the Notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C., directing the petitioner to raise objections at the trial court stage.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 251 Cr.P.C. Negotiable Instruments Act quashing of complaint

Pawan v. State Through NCT Delhi & Ors.

19 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:6743

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC

Satish Kumar Bablani v. State & Ors.

19 Aug 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:6750

The Delhi High Court granted probate to the petitioner for a duly executed Will dated 1997, allowing him to act as executor and distribute the deceased's estate as per the Will.

civil petition_allowed probate Indian Succession Act Will executor

Malti Gautam v. Union of India and Anr.

19 Aug 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:6730-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed a second disciplinary charge sheet identical to a previously quashed vague charge sheet, emphasizing the requirement of clarity in charges under CCS (CCA) Rules and allowing the petitioner’s writ petition.

administrative petition_allowed Significant charge sheet vagueness CCS (CCA) Rules 1965 disciplinary proceedings

Sandeep @ Sonu & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

19 Aug 2015 · Indermeet Kaur, J. · 2015:DHC:6754

The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants convicted of gang rape due to failure of prosecution to establish identity beyond reasonable doubt and inconsistencies in evidence, emphasizing caution in relying on victim's un-cross-examined testimony admitted under Section 33 of the Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 376(2)(g) IPC Section 33 Indian Evidence Act Test Identification Parade victim testimony