Delhi High Court
78,525 judgments
Tilak Raj v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act due to non-payment of compensation for over five years.
One Star Realty Private Limited v. e 2 e Solutions Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement for amalgamation between One Star Realty Private Limited and e 2 e Solutions Private Limited under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, with no objections from authorities or stakeholders.
JCB India Limited v. Competition Commission of India
The Delhi High Court permitted the Competition Commission's Director General to clone seized digital evidence under strict safeguards to prevent data corruption without prejudicing the petitioners.
M/S. ICICI Bank Limited v. Prem Chand Sharma
The Delhi High Court allowed the bank's appeal and appointed a receiver over a hypothecated vehicle at the ex parte stage upon default in loan repayment, emphasizing the principles governing such appointment under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC.
Tushar Anand and Ors v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation are not completed within five years of the award, even if the award predates the 2013 Act.
Commissioner of Income Tax-VI v. M/S UNITECH LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision that conflicting views on the mandatory nature of Section 80AC preclude the Commissioner of Income Tax from invoking revisionary jurisdiction under Section 263 to deny deduction claimed for delayed return filing.
Lokender Pal v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the removal order of a CISF constable for abusive language, directing reconsideration of penalty to ensure proportionality and proper appreciation of service record.
Harpal Singh & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on a bona fide settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Amit Singh v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Juvenile Justice Act based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Savita v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for using counterfeit currency but reduced her sentence to the period already served, emphasizing a balanced and reformative approach to sentencing.
Satish Kumar Mal & Anr v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon amicable settlement between the parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Madan Lal v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Jitender Ahuja v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Akbar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of the accused in an attempt to murder case, emphasizing the gravity of the offence and the applicant's antecedents.
All India Film Corporation Private Limited v. World Media Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing three transferor companies to merge into a transferee company without winding up, after finding no objections from statutory authorities or interested parties.
Harsh Gupta v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the old Land Acquisition Act are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession or compensation is not effected within five years, regardless of court stay orders.
Arvind Kumar Sharma v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of possession disputes.
Rajender Singh Chauhan & Ors. v. Lt. Governor & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 lapses if compensation is not paid within five years, applying section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, and declared the acquisition of petitioners' land lapsed.
Amolak Singh & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC based on a genuine settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
HT Media Ltd v. R.K. Institute
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a Section 138 NI Act complaint for non-prosecution due to unintentional non-appearance and remanded the case for fresh hearing.