Delhi High Court

78,525 judgments

Year:

IFCI FACTORS LTD. v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

05 Oct 2015 · SURESH KAIT · 2015:DHC:8320

The High Court of Delhi allowed the petition filed by IFCI Factors Ltd. in Crl.M.C. No.5599/2014 and dismissed the connected application as infructuous.

criminal appeal_allowed Criminal Miscellaneous Case petition allowed dismissed as infructuous High Court of Delhi

IFCI Factors Ltd. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

05 Oct 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:8319

The Delhi High Court allowed IFCI Factors Ltd.'s petition in a criminal matter based on a connected case order and dismissed the related miscellaneous application as infructuous.

criminal appeal_allowed criminal miscellaneous case connected matter petition allowed miscellaneous application dismissed

IFCI FACTORS LTD. v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

05 Oct 2015 · SURESH KAIT · RS 2015:DHC:8318

The High Court of Delhi allowed the petition filed by IFCI Factors Ltd. in a criminal miscellaneous case and dismissed the connected application as infructuous.

criminal appeal_allowed Criminal Miscellaneous Case petition allowed dismissed as infructuous High Court of Delhi

IFCI FACTORS LTD. v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

05 Oct 2015 · SURESH KAIT · 2015:DHC:8317

The High Court of Delhi allowed the petition filed by IFCI Factors Ltd. in a criminal miscellaneous case and dismissed a connected application as infructuous.

criminal appeal_allowed Criminal Miscellaneous Case IFCI Factors Ltd. High Court of Delhi petition allowed

IFCI FACTORS LTD. v. STATE & ORS.

05 Oct 2015 · SURESH KAIT · 2015:DHC:8316

The Delhi High Court set aside the Magistrate's order returning the complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act and restored the complaint for trial following a legislative amendment.

criminal appeal_allowed Negotiable Instruments Act complaint restoration legislative amendment Magistrate order set aside

Vijender Kumar v. State & Anr.

05 Oct 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:8315

The Delhi High Court quashed a Section 380 IPC FIR based on an amicable settlement between the parties, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to quash non-compoundable offences where justice so requires.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offence Section 380 IPC

Anil Dutt & Ors. v. State & Anr.

05 Oct 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:8314

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute non-compoundable offence

Ajay Sharma & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

05 Oct 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:8313

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties under its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute non-compoundable offences

Sushant Chand Gupta & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

05 Oct 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:8312

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A/406 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, affirming the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to quash non-compoundable offences arising from matrimonial disputes.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute non-compoundable offence

Dinesh Kumar v. The State

05 Oct 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:8311

The Delhi High Court dismissed as infructuous the appeal against conviction for rape and criminal intimidation since the appellant had already completed the sentence and paid the fine.

criminal appeal_dismissed rape criminal intimidation Section 376 IPC Section 506 IPC

Rajesh v. State

05 Oct 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:8310

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a step-father for rape and criminal intimidation, emphasizing that consent must be voluntary and free, and corroborated by DNA evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape consent step-father DNA profiling

Marguerite Chawla v. Kiran Abnashi Chawla & Anr

05 Oct 2015 · Najmi Waziri, J. · 2015:DHC:8309

The Delhi High Court held that a legally wedded wife with constructive possession through her husband is entitled to recovery of possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act despite pending probate proceedings and the presence of a live-in partner.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 6 Specific Relief Act constructive possession matrimonial home live-in partner

Shivani Bhat v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

05 Oct 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:8301-DB

The Delhi High Court affirmed the fundamental constitutional rights of transgender persons, directed protection against police harassment, and recognized the petitioner's right to dignity and self-determination.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant transgender rights fundamental rights gender identity police harassment

Satpal Sachdeva v. M/S Balaji Agriculture Food Products Pvt Ltd

05 Oct 2015 · Manmohan Singh, J. · 2015:DHC:8365

The Delhi High Court granted possession to the landlord under an unregistered lease due to non-payment of rent and dishonoured cheques, holding that notice was not necessary for month-to-month tenancy termination.

civil appeal_allowed unregistered lease agreement month-to-month tenancy Section 106 Transfer of Property Act dishonoured cheque

Rahul Mohindra v. Shiv Naresh Sports Pvt Ltd

05 Oct 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:8366
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC on limitation grounds when the price of work is not fixed and the limitation period begins only after raising the final bill and denial of payment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC limitation Article 18 Limitation Act Article 113 Limitation Act

Suman Lata v. Bank of India & Anr

05 Oct 2015 · Najmi Waziri · 2015:DHC:8363

The Delhi High Court held that an equitable mortgage created by a non-owner is null and void under Section 48 of the Transfer of Property Act, granting the plaintiff recovery of deposited money and permanent injunction.

civil appeal_allowed equitable mortgage transfer of property Section 48 Transfer of Property Act title

Dayco Engine Systems Private Limited v. Dayco Power Transmission Private Limited

05 Oct 2015 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2015:DHC:8345

The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Dayco Engine Systems Private Limited and Dayco Power Transmission Private Limited under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing dissolution of the transferor company without winding up.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 to 394 transferor company

M/S. ICICI Bank Limited v. Nitin Sethi and Anr.

05 Oct 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:8346

The Delhi High Court allowed the bank's appeal and appointed a receiver over a hypothecated vehicle to protect its interest in a loan default case, setting aside the trial court's order for lack of reasons.

civil appeal_allowed Significant appointment of receiver loan default hypothecation irrevocable power of attorney

Apex Safety Glass Private Limited; Narang Academic Private Limited; S P Solutions Private Limited v. New Delhi Realcon Private Limited

05 Oct 2015 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2015:DHC:8347

The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation of three transferor companies into a transferee company under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, directing compliance with statutory formalities and dissolution of transferor companies without winding up.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Section 391 Section 394

M/S. ICICI Bank Limited v. Des Raj & Anr.

05 Oct 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:8348

The Delhi High Court allowed the bank's appeal and appointed a receiver over a hypothecated vehicle to protect its interest pending suit for loan recovery, emphasizing the need for courts to record reasons when refusing such relief.

civil appeal_allowed Significant appointment of receiver loan agreement hypothecation irrevocable power of attorney