Delhi High Court
77,325 judgments
Anumaya Mehta v. JG
The Delhi High Court modified a Family Court order restricting a minor child’s travel, allowing movement within NCR without prior permission but maintaining restriction on international travel without court approval.
Lalit Kumar Arya & Anr v. M/S Prabhat Zarda Factory International (Noida)
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunctions protecting the plaintiff's registered trademarks against unauthorized use by defendants who, as ex-licensees and family members, were estopped from claiming ownership absent proof of joint Hindu family property.
The Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sunil Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of income additions based on a retracted statement and held that denial of cross-examination of a key witness violated natural justice, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.
Dipender Singh v. State and Another
The High Court disposed of the petition as not pressed after the parties settled their disputes through mediation and a Settlement Agreement.
Shamim Khan v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a recovery certificate issued under the Employees Compensation Act, holding that the petitioner was duly served notice and failed to establish violation of natural justice or jurisdictional error.
Vasvi Thr Neha Gupta & Ors. v. Sudhir Kumar Gupta & Sons (HUF) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a civil suit on the basis of a mutual Settlement Agreement including matrimonial issues, recording the settlement and allowing revival in case of breach.
Raghubir Saran Charitable Trust v. Raymond Ltd.
The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit in terms of a mutually agreed settlement requiring the defendant to remove one disputed board, thereby disposing of the suit.
M/S PCL-SUNCON (JV) v. National Highways Authority of India
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitral tribunal's plausible interpretation of contract variation clauses cannot be set aside under Section 34 merely because the court prefers a different view, affirming compensation entitlement under Clause 52.1 independent of Clause 52.3.
Puneet Kumar v. The Apparel Export Promotion Council and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent-Council to decide the petitioner's pending representation against retrospective salary refixation after obtaining competent authority's advice, restraining implementation of the impugned order meanwhile.
Captain Suresh Nath Jha v. Institute for Steel Development and Growth
The Delhi High Court held that INSDAG is not a 'State' under Article 12, dismissing the writ petition seeking service regularization and absorption of the petitioner.
Arvind Aggarwal v. Punjab Antional Bank & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act for entertaining appeals before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, dismissing the petitioner's challenge based on alleged fraud.
M. Arumugam and Anr. v. Vimal Agency and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against Canara Bank for non-release of prize money, holding that refusal without original FDR or indemnity from legal heirs does not constitute wilful disobedience.
State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur v. Vinod Kumar Agrawal
The court held that the two-year gap for promotion eligibility must be counted from the date of actual appearance at selection, not from mere application or acceptance of chance, dismissing the bank's appeal and upholding the employee's right to be considered.
Khacheru Ram v. The State (Through NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 468 and 471 IPC based on a settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Vikas Baurai v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon amicable settlement and mutual divorce, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
BRIJMOHAN BANSAL v. THE GOVERNMENT OF NCT (DELHI)
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal proceeding under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Genentech Inc and Others v. Drugs Controller General of India and Others
The Delhi High Court recognized the regulatory authority's discretion to exempt early-phase clinical trials for biosimilar drugs but restrained the drug's market launch pending detailed judicial scrutiny of the approval's legality.
Dharam Singh v. State (Govt of NCT) of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR involving non-compoundable offences under Sections 420, 468, and 471 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties at the investigation stage, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Sumit Kumar v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 323, 379, 452, and 34 IPC based on an amicable compromise between the parties, applying the inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Tirath Ram Shah Charitable Trust and Ors. v. Mrs. Sughra Bi @ Sughra Begum
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, holding that clear judicial admissions by the defendant regarding tenancy and rent entitled the plaintiff to a decree of possession after valid termination of tenancy under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act.