Delhi High Court

73,320 judgments

Year:

Vishnu Dutt Sharma & Ors. v. Smt Anuradha & Ors.

04 Mar 2016 · Suresh Kait · 2016:DHC:1910

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, affirming the inherent power of the High Court under Section 482 CrPC to do so in appropriate cases.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes non-compoundable offences

Naresh v. The State GNCT of Delhi & Anr

04 Mar 2016 · Suresh Kait · 2016:DHC:1911

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act following settlement and payment of dues, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Section 135 Indian Electricity Act Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR electricity theft

Nitin Bery v. State

04 Mar 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:1921-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 498A, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute mutual consent divorce

ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd v. Vishwa Nath & Ors.

04 Mar 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:1920

The Delhi High Court partly allowed the insurer's appeal by reducing permanent disability compensation based on actual loss of earnings and upheld the insurer's right to recover from the owner due to the driver's invalid licence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim permanent disability compensation loss of future income insurance policy breach

ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd v. Devi & Ors.

04 Mar 2016 · R.K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:1919

The Delhi High Court held that an insurer can recover compensation paid if the driver held a fake license, reduced excessive non-pecuniary damages, and lowered the interest rate on compensation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 insurance policy breach fake driving license compensation award

Farman @ Tohid Alam v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

04 Mar 2016 · Suresh Kait · 2016:DHC:1903

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 363/366 IPC where a 16-year-old girl voluntarily accompanied the petitioner, holding that no kidnapping offence was made out and the proceedings amounted to abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR kidnapping Section 363 IPC

Chiranjeev Singh Lamba & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

04 Mar 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:1904

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR under Section 498A IPC on the basis of an amicable compromise between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice in a matrimonial dispute.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Gurmeet Singh & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

04 Mar 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:1905

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Talvinder Singh & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT Delhi) & Anr

04 Mar 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:1906

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Section 482 Cr.P.C. following an amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the court's inherent power to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Chandan Singh & Anr.

04 Mar 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:1928

The Delhi High Court set aside a motor accident compensation award and remitted the matter for fresh inquiry on maintainability and liability issues where the claimant was the driver of the insured vehicle.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 insurance liability driver as claimant

Jalpac India Ltd v. United India Insurance Company Ltd

04 Mar 2016 · The Chief Justice; Jayant Nath · 2016:DHC:1901-DB

The Delhi High Court held that no double insurance existed for the transit from Mumbai to Haldwani and directed the insurer to indemnify the assured as per the surveyor's loss assessment under the Marine Insurance Act, 1963.

civil appeal_allowed Significant marine insurance double insurance Section 34 Marine Insurance Act Section 80 Marine Insurance Act

Vijay Kumar v. Shashi Nag & Ors.

04 Mar 2016 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:1898-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an oral family settlement and wills recognizing partition of jointly owned flats, dismissing the appellant's claim to a share in a specific flat bequeathed exclusively to a sister.

property appeal_dismissed Significant undivided share oral family settlement partition will

Jai Karan & Anr. v. The State & Anr.

04 Mar 2016 · Suresh Kait · 2016:DHC:1897

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes non-compoundable offences

M/s Ganpati Buildtech Pvt Ltd & Others v. Sanjeev Enterprises

04 Mar 2016 · Suresh Kait · 2016:DHC:1896

The Delhi High Court set aside the lower court's order rejecting extension of time for payment under a settlement in a Section 138 NI Act case, directing acceptance of the settlement amount with costs as per Supreme Court guidelines.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 482 CrPC Settlement in criminal appeal Damodar S. Prabhu guidelines

Jaspal Singh v. The State & Ors.

04 Mar 2016 · Suresh Kait · 2016:DHC:1895

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 365 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 365 IPC amicable settlement

Sushil Nagpal v. State & Anr

04 Mar 2016 · Suresh Kait · 2016:DHC:1894

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal proceeding under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, affirming the inherent power of courts under Section 482 CrPC to do so in appropriate cases.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes Section 498A IPC

Vinod Sharma v. The State (N.C.T of Delhi)

04 Mar 2016 · Sunita Gupta · 2016:DHC:1900

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under the NDPS Act, ruling that non-joining of independent witnesses and delay in sending samples to FSL do not vitiate prosecution if police testimony is credible and procedural safeguards are substantially complied with.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 20(b)(ii)(C) search and seizure independent witnesses

Zion Promoters & Developers Pvt Ltd v. Ferrous Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

04 Mar 2016 · J. R. Midha · 2016:DHC:1926

The Delhi High Court held that an arbitrator appointed after filing a Section 11(6) petition is invalid and appointed an independent arbitrator, affirming that any party to the arbitration agreement can seek court intervention upon failure of the agreed appointment procedure.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator failure of appointment procedure locus standi

Prakash Chand Kaushik v. M/S Vishal Timer Traders

04 Mar 2016 · V.K. Shali · 2016:DHC:1916

The Delhi High Court held that a tenant's prior admission that leased vacant land did not constitute 'premises' under the Rent Control Act estops him from later claiming applicability of the Act to avoid eviction, allowing the landlord's suit for possession.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act Section 50 vacant land premises definition

Ved Prakash v. State

04 Mar 2016 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2016:DHC:1918-DB

The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC, holding that the death occurred in a sudden fight without premeditation or cruelty.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC culpable homicide