Delhi High Court
72,289 judgments
Rajinder Kumar Sethi v. Sushil Kumar Sethi
The Delhi High Court decreed possession and mesne profits in favor of the plaintiff, holding that he was the absolute owner of the suit property and dismissing the defendant's claim of family settlement and adverse possession.
MAS DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. v. MAGUS CONSORTIUM ORCHID AVENUE (P) LTD.
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award for lack of adequate reasoning and invalid termination based on delay where time was not the essence of the contract.
WINGS PHARMACEUTICALS (P) LTD v. PRAVEEN BHASIN
The Delhi High Court held that a suit based on a single buyer-seller relationship is barred by limitation as no open mutual current account existed, and rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
Anil Kumar v. High Court of Delhi
Delhi High Court partially allowed writ petitions challenging answer keys of the Delhi Higher Judicial Service Examination, correcting some answers, deleting ambiguous questions, and clarifying principles of judicial review and adverse possession.
Anil Kumar v. High Court of Delhi
Delhi High Court partially allowed writ petitions challenging answer keys of the Delhi Higher Judicial Service Examination, correcting certain answers and deleting ambiguous questions based on legal principles and precedents.
Anil Kumar v. High Court of Delhi
Delhi High Court partially allowed writ petitions challenging answer keys of the Delhi Higher Judicial Service Examination, clarifying judicial review limits, correcting key answers, deleting ambiguous questions, and addressing related legal principles.
Nand Kishore v. DDA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking conversion of a temporary lease into a permanent lease over government-acquired land, holding that possession alone does not confer right to permanent lease absent a policy or obligation by the authority.
Nand Kishore v. Dilshad Public School and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that proceedings before a Conciliation Officer under the ID Act are conciliatory and not judicial, thus withdrawal of claims there does not bar filing an appeal under the Delhi School Education Act, and dismissal of such appeal for non-disclosure was erroneous.
Odeon Builders Pvt Limited v. Engineers India Limited
The Delhi High Court held that Engineers India Limited is a proper party to the arbitration agreement with Odeon Builders and appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.