Delhi High Court

72,805 judgments

Year:

Wular Trust v. Additional Director of Wealth Tax (Exemp.) and Ors.

23 Mar 2016 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2016:DHC:2461-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions by charitable trusts seeking wealth tax exemption and refund for belatedly filed returns where statutory disinvestment conditions were not met.

tax petition_dismissed Significant charitable trust income tax exemption wealth tax disinvestment

Goodwill Appartment Pvt Ltd v. Velvet Apple Hotels Pvt Ltd & Anr.

23 Mar 2016 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2016:DHC:2464

The Delhi High Court held that failure to deposit rent arrears as directed under a registered lease justifies striking off the defense and granting a decree for arrears under Order XV-A CPC, rejecting defendants' oral modification and quid pro quo claims.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XV-A CPC lease deed arrears of rent strike off defense

Noor Mohammad & Ors. v. State & Anr.

23 Mar 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:2476

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR under Sections 308 and 452 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences amicable settlement

Raisuddin v. Gulshan

23 Mar 2016 · Ashutosh Kumar · 2016:DHC:2474

The Delhi High Court upheld the invalidity of the alleged nikah due to lack of proof of valid offer and acceptance, dismissing the appellant's suit for restitution of conjugal rights and declaring the nikahnama null and void.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Muslim marriage nikah nikahnama Ijab and Qubul

Anukriti Dubey v. Partha Kansabanik and Anr

23 Mar 2016 · Ashutosh Kumar · 2016:DHC:2473

The Delhi High Court held that a landlord can lawfully evict a tenant after expiry of tenancy despite the tenant's wife's statutory right of residence under the Domestic Violence Act, as such rights do not extend against third-party landlords.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Domestic Violence Act 2005 shared household right to residence landlord-tenant relationship

Vipin K. Singh v. Surender Singh & Ors.

23 Mar 2016 · Ashutosh Kumar · 2016:DHC:2470

The Delhi Land Reforms Act bars civil court jurisdiction over agricultural and Lal Dora land disputes, and the suit filed beyond limitation was rightly dismissed.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Land Reforms Act Section 185 Section 186 Order VII Rule 11 CPC

Mohd. Shamim v. Mst. Aman Jamal & Ors.

23 Mar 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:2510

The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's decree awarding property shares to respondents who had withdrawn from the suit, holding that only properly impleaded parties can claim such shares, while allowing them to pursue independent claims.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition suit withdrawal from suit amended memorandum of parties heirs

Ashok Kumar v. Vijay & Ors.

23 Mar 2016 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2016:DHC:2516-DB

The High Court dismissed the State's criminal leave to appeal petition upholding the trial court's acquittal in a dowry death case due to lack of reliable evidence and absence of perversity.

criminal appeal_dismissed dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC criminal leave to appeal

Verizon India Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner, Service Tax, Delhi & Ors.

22 Mar 2016 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2016:DHC:9214-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed Verizon India Pvt Ltd to withdraw its service tax writ petitions with liberty to pursue other remedies, dismissing the petitions as withdrawn.

administrative petition_dismissed Procedural writ petition withdrawal liberty to seek remedies service tax

CIT Appellant v. Delhi Kalyan Samiti

22 Mar 2016 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhrru · 2016:DHC:8455-DB
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that issuance of notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act is mandatory before framing assessment under Section 144 when the return is not accepted at face value, and belated returns filed after adjournment cannot be ignored.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act Section 143(2) Section 144 Section 148

Vinod Chopra v. Vasudev Chopra & Anr.

22 Mar 2016 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2016:DHC:2407

The Delhi High Court held that inheritance of ancestral property after 1956 does not create HUF property absent proof of HUF existence or creation, dismissed the suit for lack of cause of action and barred by the Benami Transactions Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Hindu Undivided Family ancestral property self-acquired property

S Navneet Singh & Anr v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

22 Mar 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:2410

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Section 482 Cr.P.C. upon amicable settlement between parties to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences matrimonial dispute

BATI v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

22 Mar 2016 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2016:DHC:2457-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of possession claims.

property petition_allowed Significant Section 24(2) RTFCTLARR Act 2013 Land Acquisition Act 1894 lapse of acquisition proceedings compensation non-payment

Shanti v. Ashraf Khan & Anr.

22 Mar 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:2446

The Delhi High Court set aside the tribunal’s dismissal of motor accident compensation claims involving deceased persons carrying contraband, remanding for proper inquiry to identify driver and passengers and consider all contentions.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 163A compensation motor accident claims tribunal

Shanti v. Ashraf Khan & Anr.

22 Mar 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:2445

The Delhi High Court set aside the tribunal’s dismissal of motor accident compensation claims involving deceased persons engaged in illegal activity, directing a proper inquiry to identify the driver and passengers and reconsider the claims under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

motor_vehicle_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 163A motor accident claim compensation

Shanti v. Ashraf Khan & Anr.

22 Mar 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:2444

The Delhi High Court set aside the tribunal's dismissal of motor accident compensation claims involving deceased persons carrying contraband, remanding for proper inquiry to identify the driver and passengers before adjudicating compensation under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 163A compensation motor accident claims

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Manisha Devi & Ors.

22 Mar 2016 · R.K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:2443

The Delhi High Court held that future prospects cannot be added to loss of dependency in motor accident claims without proof of progressive income increase, reducing the compensation accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant future prospects loss of dependency motor accident claim self-employed

Meru Cab Company Pvt Ltd v. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd

22 Mar 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:2441

The Delhi High Court held that an insurer cannot avoid third party insurance liability or seek recovery from the vehicle owner based on a separate subscription agreement with the driver or alleged violation of the Radio Taxi Scheme, affirming the statutory nature of third party insurance claims.

motor_vehicle_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 third party insurance employer-employee relationship Radio Taxi Scheme, 2006

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd v. Kavita & Ors.

22 Mar 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:2442

The Delhi High Court held that personal accident insurance cover applies only to the registered owner-driver, and compensation cannot be granted to a person merely borrowing the vehicle.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 personal accident cover owner-driver insurance policy

Kapil Chawla & Ors. v. State & Anr.

22 Mar 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:2439-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following a bona fide settlement between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC