Delhi High Court

72,805 judgments

Year:

Kamlesh v. State (NCT of Delhi)

23 Mar 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:2493

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of accused charged with murder under Section 302 IPC, holding that strong prima facie evidence and early trial stage warranted denial of bail.

criminal bail_denied bail Section 302 IPC ligature strangulation prima facie case

Bhola Nath Sharma through LRs v. Union of India through LAC & Anr.

23 Mar 2016 · Ashutosh Kumar, J. · 2016:DHC:2475

The Delhi High Court upheld the Reference Court's determination of compensation at Rs. 250 per sq. yard for land acquired in Bahapur, affirming the application of comparable sales method and statutory benefits under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 market value compensation Section 4 notification

Kamlesh v. State (NCT of Delhi)

23 Mar 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:2494

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of accused in a murder case, holding that sufficient material evidence and the serious nature of the offence warranted denial of bail at the trial's initial stage.

criminal bail_denied Significant bail Section 302 IPC ligature strangulation prima facie case

Ramesh Lal Dogra v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.

23 Mar 2016 · Sanjiv Khanna; Najmi Waziri · 2016:DHC:2496

The Delhi High Court held that a senior DMRC employee drawing lower pay than his junior promoted subsequently to the same post is entitled to pay parity under Rule 8.[5] of the GCSR, setting aside the tribunal's rejection of the claim.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant pay parity stepping-up of pay seniority General Conditions of Service Rules

Brij Mohan & Ors. v. Radha Park Plot Holder Welfare Association & Ors.

23 Mar 2016 · Najmi Waziri · 2016:DHC:2495

The Delhi High Court held that Civil Courts lack jurisdiction over agricultural land disputes governed by the Delhi Land Reforms Act, setting aside a Civil Court decree that invalidated a Revenue Court partition order obtained without jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 Court of Revenue Assistant Civil Court jurisdiction Agricultural land

Zamindar Motor Transport Cooperative Society Ltd. v. Harjeet Singh

23 Mar 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:2511

Delhi High Court reduced motor accident compensation by rejecting unsupported claims of permanent disability and future loss of earning capacity, directing refund of excess amounts to insurer.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation permanent disability loss of earning capacity

Mohd Yunus Qureshi v. Madhu & Ors

23 Mar 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:2508

The Delhi High Court allowed revival of the petitioner's right to cross-examine the claimant's witness in a motor accident claim case under Article 227, subject to costs and conditions, emphasizing due diligence and fair trial principles.

civil appeal_allowed Significant right to cross-examination Article 227 Constitution of India motor accident claim due diligence

Sharmila Bhalla v. Niranjan Giri & Ors.

23 Mar 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:2507
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for non-pecuniary damages and increased interest rate in a motor accident death claim, directing insurer to pay the enhanced amount.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation loss of love and affection funeral expenses

Birmati v. Abdul Majid Bhat & Ors.

23 Mar 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:2506

The Delhi High Court enhanced motor accident compensation by excluding future prospects for a self-employed deceased, adding non-pecuniary damages, and directing interest from the appeal date.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation future prospects self-employed deceased

Vijay Manchanda v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr

23 Mar 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:2497-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed leave to appeal and restored a complaint dismissed for non-appearance under Section 138 NI Act for fresh adjudication on merits, imposing costs on the complainant.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act dismissal in default leave to appeal restoration of complaint

New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Usha & Ors.

23 Mar 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:2505

The Delhi High Court directed payment of interest on motor accident compensation and modified the apportionment between the deceased's mother and grandmother, dismissing the insurer's appeal as withdrawn.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 compensation interest on compensation

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-XI v. Janata Party

23 Mar 2016 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2016:DHC:2462-DB

The Delhi High Court held that non-compliance with mandatory conditions under Section 13A of the Income Tax Act disentitles a political party from exemption on voluntary contributions, rendering such income taxable.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 13A Income Tax Act political party exemption voluntary contributions income tax assessment

New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Usha & Ors.

23 Mar 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:2504

The Delhi High Court directed payment of interest on motor accident compensation and modified apportionment equally between mother and grandmother after insurer withdrew its appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 compensation interest on compensation

Sanjeev Chopra v. Anjan Gupta

23 Mar 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:2500

The Delhi High Court allowed the motor accident claim appeal by negating contributory negligence and enhancing compensation for pain and suffering.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation contributory negligence pain and suffering

New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Bimla Devi & Ors.

23 Mar 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:2509
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that future prospects cannot be added to loss of dependency for self-employed deceased and denied full exoneration of insurer despite policy breach, modifying compensation accordingly.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant loss of dependency future prospects motor vehicles act insurance policy breach

Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajinder Kaur & Ors.

23 Mar 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:2501

The Delhi High Court reduced the compensation awarded in a motor accident claim based on revised dependency calculations and rejected the insurer's plea for recovery rights due to lack of evidence of the driver's invalid license.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of dependency minimum wages personal expenses deduction

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Laxmi Chand Lalwani

23 Mar 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:2502

The Delhi High Court held that a motor accident claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act is maintainable against the owner and insurer despite deletion of the driver, affirming vicarious liability and upholding compensation awarded for negligent driving.

motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 motor accident claim vicarious liability

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Usha Devi & Ors.

23 Mar 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:2503
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court recalculated compensation in a motor accident claim by excluding future prospects and applying minimum wages for a skilled mason, reducing the award to ₹8,00,000 with interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 loss of dependency future prospects minimum wages

Central Electricity Supply Utility of Odisha v. Union of India and Ors.

23 Mar 2016 · The Chief Justice; Jayant Nath · 2016:DHC:2499-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Sections 15 and 16 of the MSMED Act, 2006, mandating timely payments and interest on delayed payments to protect small and medium enterprises.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 Section 15 MSMED Act Section 16 MSMED Act Interest on delayed payments

SI Anand Parkash v. Jai Kumar & Anr

23 Mar 2016 · G.S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2016:DHC:2498-DB

Delhi High Court enhanced the sentence from five months to one year rigorous imprisonment for attempt to murder, emphasizing proportionality and social deterrence in sentencing.

criminal sentence_modified Significant Section 307 IPC Attempt to murder Sentencing discretion Proportionality in sentencing