Delhi High Court
71,423 judgments
Vijay Saluja v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court condoned a 1163-day delay and restored a dismissed land acquisition appeal to allow the appellant to claim enhanced compensation awarded by the Supreme Court, emphasizing a liberal approach to limitation in land acquisition cases.
Appellant in person v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR .....
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for land acquisition by adopting the highest bona fide pre-notification sale deed as market value with statutory benefits, rejecting post-notification sales without proof of market stability.
Through: Mr. Raman Kapoor, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ripu and Mr. Vijay, Advs v. KULDEEP SINGH GUJRAL (HUF) & ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld most Trial Court directions on property access and maintenance but set aside the order to shift utility meters, allowing official meter reading access during suit pendency.
State Transport Authority and Anr v. Pushpinder Singh Malik and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed a delayed writ petition challenging a CAT interim order restraining disengagement of temporary ex-servicemen employees, holding that delay and abuse of process warranted dismissal.
Mr. Balbir Singh, Senior Advocate with Ms.Rubal Maini and Ms. Pramila Viswanathan, Advocates. v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ......
The Delhi High Court set aside the CESTAT order imposing anti-dumping duties for procedural lapses and remanded the matter for reasoned adjudication on merits including statutory timelines and natural justice compliance.
Union of India v. Rambir Singh
The High Court upheld the illegality of a stigmatic termination without prior opportunity and refused belated additional evidence, dismissing the Union of India's second appeal for reinstatement of a CRPF constable.
Pawan Kumar v. Consortium for Educational Communication
The Delhi High Court upheld a temporary transfer order of an employee within the same organization despite absence of explicit contractual transferability, dismissing the writ petition challenging the transfer.
Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi v. The Self Financing Educational Institutions Association
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective fee fixation under the Delhi Professional Colleges Act is impermissible, and the Government cannot rescind a fee notification once accepted and notified for future academic years, except to the extent of invalid retrospective application.
Ramakant Dixit v. Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India Limited and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the CVC's advice is advisory and its reconsideration beyond prescribed time limits is permissible, dismissing the petition challenging initiation of disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner.
M/S PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. v. SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner, authorized under a concession agreement with DMRC, has the right to charge parking fees on the property, and SDMC cannot restrain such collection without statutory authority.
F HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD & OTHERS v. DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA & OTHERS
The Delhi High Court allowed plaintiffs' applications for discovery of regulatory and clinical trial documents from defendants in bio-similar drug suits, holding such documents relevant and necessary for adjudication despite confidentiality claims.
Vinod Singh Yadav v. M/S Securitans India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the Labour Court in Delhi has jurisdiction to adjudicate the industrial dispute as part of the cause of action accrued in Delhi, setting aside the order declining jurisdiction.
Arvind Kaushik v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed a school to admit an EWS student and provide mandatory educational benefits, enforcing the student's right to free and compulsory education.
Union of India v. Suresh Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's decision quashing recovery of excess MACP payments from a retired employee without prior notice, reaffirming Supreme Court precedents protecting employees from retrospective pay reductions absent fraud or knowledge.
Commissioner of Customs Air Cargo Customs (Import) v. Escorts Heart Institute & Research Centre
The Delhi High Court allowed the Revenue's appeal, holding that penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act is mandatory when invoked in the Show Cause Notice for mis-declaration, and set aside the CESTAT order deleting the penalty.
Raj Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of physical possession.
Ratiram v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, granting the petitioner a declaration accordingly.
Ajab Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years from the award date.
Gajinder v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid within five years, declaring the petitioner’s acquisition proceedings lapsed due to non-payment.
SAMO v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of physical possession.