Delhi High Court

71,423 judgments

Year:

Mukesh v. State

22 Apr 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:3128-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's plea for parole due to prior misconduct, violation of parole conditions, and adverse police reports, upholding the competent authority's discretion to deny parole.

criminal petition_dismissed parole Article 226 Section 482 Cr.P.C. conduct in prison

Harish Kumar & Ors. v. State

22 Apr 2016 · Sunita Gupta · 2016:DHC:3095

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Sections 498A and 304B IPC for dowry death, affirming that credible testimony of close relatives and a suicide note can establish cruelty and harassment leading to dowry death.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC Section 113B Indian Evidence Act

Mohd. Aklaq v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

22 Apr 2016 · S.P. Garg · 2016:DHC:3096

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for rape of a minor under Section 376 IPC, ruling that consent is immaterial if the prosecutrix is below sixteen years, but modified the sentence considering the appellant's circumstances.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 376 IPC rape minor consent age determination

Krishan Kumar & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

22 Apr 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:3097

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties in a matrimonial dispute, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR compoundable offences domestic violence

Jamia Hamdard & Ors. v. M M Nomai

22 Apr 2016 · V.K. Shali · 2016:DHC:3135

The Delhi High Court held that a fresh dismissal order passed within the court's stipulated period pursuant to setting aside an earlier dismissal negates entitlement to back wages beyond that order, setting aside the executing court's order granting back wages and attachment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant dismissal natural justice back wages reinstatement

Union of India v. Jayaraj Naik

22 Apr 2016 · Sanjiv Khanna; Najmi Waziri · 2016:DHC:3117-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal, upholding the CAT's quashing of an unsustainable adverse grading in an employee's Annual Performance Appraisal Report due to procedural irregularities and lack of multi-level assessment.

administrative appeal_dismissed Annual Performance Appraisal Report Department of Personnel & Training Office Memorandum grading

M/S Saurabh Agrotech Private Limited v. Radhey Shyam Agencies

22 Apr 2016 · Manmohan Singh · 2016:DHC:3116

The Delhi High Court upheld the plaintiff's registered assignment and proprietorship of the trademark "ASHOKA", restraining defendants from infringement and passing off, affirming that registered assignments are prima facie valid unless set aside by appropriate authority.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark assignment trademark infringement passing off Trade Marks Act, 1999

Sanjay Chandeliya v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

22 Apr 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:3112

The Delhi High Court allowed revision petitions and compounded the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act following an amicable settlement and payment of compounding fees as per Supreme Court guidelines.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act compoundable offence compounding of offence Memorandum of Understanding

Sanjay Chandeliya v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

22 Apr 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:3111

The Delhi High Court allowed revision petitions to compound the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act following an amicable settlement and compliance with Supreme Court compounding guidelines.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act compoundable offence compounding of offence Memorandum of Understanding

Sonu v. Rajni

22 Apr 2016 · Gita Mittal; I.S. Mehta · 2016:DHC:3114-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court’s interim maintenance order under the Hindu Marriage Act, allowing payment of a lump sum amount in installments and confirming maintenance payable from the date of application.

family appeal_allowed interim maintenance Hindu Marriage Act Section 24 Section 26

Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board v. Ranbir Singh

22 Apr 2016 · Sanjiv Khanna; Najmi Waziri · 2016:DHC:3113-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Government of NCT of Delhi to examine and decide the equivalence of a National Trade Certificate with the prescribed diploma under Recruitment Rules for Draftsman Grade III, without deciding the question itself.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Recruitment Rules Draftsman Grade III National Trade Certificate Diploma equivalence

Raju v. State

22 Apr 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:3127-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking parole due to lack of police verification and the petitioner's history as a habitual parole violator.

criminal petition_dismissed parole police verification habitual offender Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Rudal Mahto & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

22 Apr 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:3126-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following reconciliation and withdrawal of complaints between the matrimonial parties.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 482 Cr.P.C.

G. Neelakandan & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

22 Apr 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:3125-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following a lawful and amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute Section 482 CrPC

Sanjeev Kumar & Ors. v. State & Anr.

22 Apr 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:3124-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 468, 471, 387, 506, and 120B IPC on the ground of an amicable settlement between business associates, emphasizing the court's power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in private disputes.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement private offences

Kamal & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

22 Apr 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:3123-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and compensation agreement between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC

Ranjit Singh & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

22 Apr 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:3122-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial discord following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute 498A IPC

The Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation v. Munesh @ Dimple & Ors.

22 Apr 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:3118
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court modified compensation in a motor accident claim by disallowing future prospects without proof of earnings, confirming age for multiplier, enhancing non-pecuniary damages, and increasing interest rate.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of dependency future prospects minimum wages

Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd v. Naresh Kumar & Ors.

22 Apr 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:3115

The Delhi High Court remitted the motor accident compensation claim for fresh inquiry due to insufficient proof of claimant's income and allowed both parties to produce further evidence, setting aside the quantum of compensation awarded by the tribunal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation proof of income salary certificate

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd v. Shamim Khan & Ors.

22 Apr 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:3119

The Delhi High Court held that a driver’s licence authorizing only motorcycles or tractors is invalid for a medium goods vehicle, entitling the insurer to recover compensation paid due to breach of insurance policy terms.

motor_vehicle_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 driving licence validity medium goods vehicle light motor vehicle