Delhi High Court

71,423 judgments

Year:

Bhola Rishi v. State of NCT of Delhi

16 May 2016 · Pradeep Nandrajog · 2016:DHC:3916

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Bhola Rishi for gang rape under Section 376(2)(g) IPC based on credible victim testimony and conclusive DNA evidence, dismissing his appeal and awarding victim compensation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant gang rape Section 376 IPC DNA evidence victim testimony

Bhagwan Dass v. State

16 May 2016 · Pradeep Nandrajog, J. · 2016:DHC:3915

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Bhagwan Dass for kidnapping and raping an 8-year-old girl, emphasizing the sufficiency of credible victim testimony supported by medical evidence despite inconclusive DNA results, and directed victim compensation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape victim testimony kidnapping sexual assault forensic evidence

Baani Facilities Management Private Limited v. Baani Technology Services Private Limited

16 May 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:3933

The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing the transferor company's dissolution without winding up and clarifying compliance on company name retention.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 to 394 transferor company

SLN Piedmont Development Company Private Limited v. Piedmont Development Company Private Limited

16 May 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:3932

The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing dissolution of the transferor company without winding up.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 to 394 transferor company

Basera Realtech Private Limited & Ors. v. SRK Tradelinks Private Limited

16 May 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:3944

The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation between eleven transferor companies and a transferee company under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing dissolution of transferor companies without winding up.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 and 394 transferor companies

Trans American Travels (India) Private Limited v. Trans American Information Systems Private Limited

16 May 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:3934

The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, approving the merger and dissolution of the transferor company without winding up.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 to 394 Official Liquidator

Superior Packagings Private Limited v. Pioneer Securities Private Limited

16 May 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:3935

The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approving a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties had given written consent.

corporate appeal_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act, 1956 Sections 391 and 394 dispensing with meetings

RRJ Infrastructure Company Private Limited; Fountain Beverages Private Limited v. Pearl Drinks Limited

16 May 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:3936

The Delhi High Court allowed a petition to dispense with convening meetings of the transferee company's shareholders and creditors for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation involving wholly owned subsidiaries under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.

corporate petition_allowed Significant Scheme of Amalgamation Section 391(1) Companies Act, 1956 dispensation of meetings wholly owned subsidiaries

Capital Electrotech Limited v. Capital Urjatech Limited

16 May 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:3937

The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with the requirement of convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties had given their written consent.

corporate appeal_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Section 391(1) dispensing meetings

Stratford Academy Limited v. FIITJEE Limited

16 May 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:3938

The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for a Scheme of Amalgamation where the transferor is a wholly owned subsidiary and all consents were obtained.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Scheme of Amalgamation Section 391 Companies Act 1956 dispensing meetings wholly owned subsidiary

Avanti Bristlers Private Limited v. W.H. Targett India Limited

16 May 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:3939

The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing two transferor companies to merge into a transferee company and stand dissolved without winding up.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 and 394 Official Liquidator

Naveen Import Private Limited v. Ekta Infratech Private Limited

16 May 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:3940

The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation of seven transferor companies into one transferee company under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, after no objections were raised by statutory authorities.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Section 391 Section 394

Bright Lifecare Private Limited v. 1MG Technologies Private Limited

16 May 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:3941

The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement for demerger between Bright Lifecare Private Limited and 1MG Technologies Private Limited under the Companies Act, 1956, finding all procedural and substantive requirements satisfied.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Arrangement Companies Act 1956 demerger sanction

Vikas Yadav v. State NCT of Delhi

16 May 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:3942

The Delhi High Court held that the executive cannot grant parole during the pendency of a criminal appeal before the Supreme Court, following the binding ratio in K.M. Nanavati.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant parole Article 161 Constitution Article 142 Constitution K.M. Nanavati

CONCLAVE PHARMA PVT LTD v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI

16 May 2016 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2016:DHC:3943-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an inadvertent clerical error in a bank guarantee does not render a tender bid non-responsive if the bank's liability remains clear, quashing the rejection of the petitioner's bid.

administrative petition_allowed Significant bank guarantee earnest money deposit tender conditions non-compliance

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v. Lava International Ltd

16 May 2016 · Manmohan Singh · 2016:DHC:3908

The Delhi High Court emphasized strict adherence to trial schedules under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, rejecting the defendant's attempts to delay a patent infringement suit and directing expeditious completion of trial.

civil other Significant patent infringement standard essential patents Commercial Courts Act 2015 trial management

Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Assistant Director of Income Tax

16 May 2016 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2016:DHC:3894-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a subsidiary assessed independently on arm's length basis cannot be deemed a Permanent Establishment of its foreign parent for reassessment without tangible material indicating income escaping assessment.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Permanent Establishment Transfer Pricing Arm's Length Price Section 148 Income Tax Act

Commissioner of Wealth Tax v. Mohan Exports India P. Ltd.

16 May 2016 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2016:DHC:3895-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that unregistered property over which the Assessee has possession and control belongs to the Assessee for wealth tax purposes, allowing Revenue's appeals for certain assessment years while dismissing others based on factual findings and statutory interpretation.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Finance Act, 1983 net wealth belonging to

Union of India v. Laxmi Devi

16 May 2016 · Sanjiv Khanna; Najmi Waziri · 2016:DHC:3931-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing regularization of casual laborers despite their failure to meet medical standards applicable to new recruits, emphasizing their long-term efficient service.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant medical standards regularization casual laborers arbitrariness

Varsha v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

16 May 2016 · Manmohan Singh; Hima Kohli; Veena Birbal; Pratibha Rani; Sid... · 2016:DHC:9066

The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 18 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 and dismissed the petition challenging an eviction order passed under this provision.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 Section 18 ITP Act constitutional validity eviction order