Delhi High Court

71,423 judgments

Year:

Kamal Sharma v. Union of India

19 May 2016 · Hima Kohli; Deepa Sharma · 2016:DHC:4122

The Delhi High Court upheld the Indian Navy's discretion to reject a candidate on medical grounds related to ear injury, dismissing the petition challenging cancellation of candidature for the post of Sailor.

administrative petition_dismissed medical fitness armed forces recruitment discretion of employer tympanic membrane rupture

Surender Singh v. Director-General, Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force

19 May 2016 · Hima Kohli; Deepa Sharma · 2016:DHC:4120

The Delhi High Court directed the competent authority to consider the petitioner’s pending representation against his transfer and noted the cancellation of his movement order, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.

administrative petition_dismissed transfer order service representation Indo-Tibetan Border Police Movement Order

CPL Ranjeet Kumar v. Union of India

19 May 2016 · Hima Kohli; Deepa Sharma · 2016:DHC:4119

The Delhi High Court held that a writ petition challenging refusal of discharge from service is premature if the administrative application is pending, and allowed interim relief for a limited period pending fresh petition.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition discharge from service ex-post facto NOC prematurity

Rahul Gainan v. Union of India

19 May 2016 · Hima Kohli; Deepa Sharma · 2016:DHC:4118

The Delhi High Court directed a Review Medical Board to reassess the petitioner's medical fitness for Indian Navy recruitment due to conflicting medical reports on hyperextension of elbow joints, making the Board's report final and binding.

administrative petition_allowed medical fitness hyperextension of elbow joints Indian Navy recruitment Review Medical Board

Narendra Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.

19 May 2016 · Hima Kohli; Deepa Sharma · 2016:DHC:4125

The Delhi High Court upheld the Indian Navy's medical disqualification of a candidate for toe deformity and dismissed his petition challenging the rejection and denial of a review medical examination.

administrative petition_dismissed medical fitness Indian Navy recruitment deformity of feet bilateral overriding of toes

State (NCT of Delhi) v. Anil

19 May 2016 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2016:DHC:4124-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rape case where consent was allegedly obtained under false promise of marriage, emphasizing the unreliability of prosecution evidence and the necessity of credible testimony.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape consent under misconception of fact false promise of marriage sole testimony of prosecutrix

Brijesh Kumar Gautam v. State

19 May 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:4148-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed parole to a convict for urgent house renovation and social reintegration, emphasizing the constitutional right to parole despite past parole violations.

criminal petition_allowed Significant parole constitutional right convict social reintegration

Manjula Verma Krippendorf v. Commissioner MCD & Anr

19 May 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:4147-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition seeking protection and reliefs for the petitioner and directed police authorities to act on complaints while granting liberty to pursue other remedies in court.

constitutional other Article 226 Constitution of India Section 482 CrPC Personal Security Officers Police protection

Universal Sompo General Insurance Company Limited v. LRS of Maladevi & Ors.

19 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4130

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal and upheld the compensation awarded to the deceased housewife's family without deductions for personal expenses, following established precedent.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim compensation housewife loss of dependency

Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Sangeeta & Ors.

19 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4131

The Delhi High Court recalculated compensation in a motor accident claim by correcting the deceased's income, upheld future prospects addition, rejected insurer's permit expiry plea, and enhanced interest to 9% per annum.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant loss of dependency future prospects motor accident claim income tax return

Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Sangeeta & Ors.

19 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4126

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by correctly applying future prospects to the deceased's income and rejected insurer's plea of permit expiry, awarding 9% interest on the amount.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of dependency future prospects income tax return

Nitesh Jindal & Ors. v. The State & Anr.

18 May 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:4238-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable matrimonial settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Section 498A IPC mutual consent divorce

Amit Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

18 May 2016 · Hima Kohli; Sunil Gaur · 2016:DHC:4199
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition on territorial jurisdiction grounds, emphasizing the doctrine of forum conveniens and directing petitioners to approach the Allahabad High Court.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant forum conveniens territorial jurisdiction writ petition Article 226

DELHI STATE CONSUMER COOPERATIVE FEDERATION LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

18 May 2016 · J.R. Midha; Manmohan Singh · 2016:DHC:8333

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to appoint a sole arbitrator within six weeks under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, allowing the plea of limitation to be raised before the Arbitral Tribunal.

arbitration petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment of arbitrator sole arbitrator

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Kailashi & Ors.

18 May 2016 · R.K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4066
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that negligence must be proved by evidence in claims under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act and remanded the matter for fresh inquiry due to lack of proper proof of negligence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act Section 166 negligence burden of proof

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sh. Maiku @ Pahari Singh & Ors.

18 May 2016 · R.K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4073
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that claimants must prove negligence under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act to establish insurer liability and remanded the case for fresh inquiry due to lack of such proof.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act Section 166 negligence motor accident claim

Bhola Ram Patel v. New Delhi Municipal Council

18 May 2016 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Deepa Sharma · 2016:DHC:4065-DB

The Delhi High Court clarified that existing street vendors have interim protection under the Street Vendors Act, 2014, subject to survey and licensing by Town Vending Committees, balancing their right to livelihood with public interest.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Street Vendors Act 2014 Town Vending Committee Right to livelihood Section 3 and 4 interpretation

ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. SUJATA GHILDIYAL

18 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4064

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal and upheld compensation for loss of earnings during child care leave taken for treatment in a motor accident claim.

civil appeal_dismissed motor accident claim loss of earnings child care leave compensation

DDA v. Shalini Kanwar

18 May 2016 · Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:4084
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that victims can appeal against acquittal orders only after obtaining leave of the High Court under Section 378(3) CrPC, dismissing revision petitions filed without such leave as not maintainable.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant revision petition order of acquittal victim's right to appeal Section 372 CrPC

Ganeshi Lal & Ors. v. The Chairman DDA & Anr.

18 May 2016 · Sanjiv Khanna; Najmi Waziri · 2016:DHC:4063-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' claim for pay parity with Assistant Security Officers in other organizations, holding that pay fixation decisions by expert bodies require cogent evidence of grave errors for judicial interference.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant equal pay for equal work pay fixation Assistant Security Officer Delhi Development Authority