Delhi High Court

69,037 judgments

Year:

Pharmacyclics LLC & Anr. v. Hetero Labs Limited & Ors.

06 Oct 2006 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:9246
Cites 2 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of an IPAB patent judgment under the de facto doctrine, granting interim injunctions against defendants infringing the patent for Ibrutinib.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant de facto doctrine patent infringement interim injunction IPAB judgment

Gemalto S.A. v. The Controller of Patents and Others

30 Jun 2006 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:8351

The Delhi High Court set aside a patent rejection order based on outdated guidelines and directed fresh consideration under revised Computer Related Invention guidelines.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Procedural patent application Computer Related Invention guidelines patent examination reconsideration

Modi-Mundipharma Pvt. Limited v. Speciality Meditech Pvt. Ltd.

22 May 2006 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:5039-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant's registered trademarks were descriptive or unused standalone marks, and the respondents' use of FEMICONTIN was bona fide and not infringing or passing off.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant trademark infringement passing off family of marks descriptive mark

Delhi International Airport Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

25 Apr 2006 · Yashwant Varma · 2022:DHC:4370
Cites 0 · Cited by 10

The Delhi High Court held that lease termination under the 2002 lease deed takes effect only after the 12-month notice period with due compliance, and contractual disputes without statutory basis are not ordinarily amenable to writ jurisdiction, dismissing DIAL's challenge to MoCA and AAI's decisions permitting HCI to retain possession.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant lease termination airport land contractual dispute writ jurisdiction

Shri Khailesh Garg v. M/S Abhipra Capital Limited and Anr.

13 Apr 2006 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:7416

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award against the petitioner, holding that notice was duly served and the respondent had locus to invoke arbitration despite disputes over the agreement and substituted service.

civil petition_dismissed Significant arbitration service of notice substituted service arbitral award

Airports Authority of India v. Delhi International Airport Ltd.; Airports Authority of India v. Mumbai International Airport Ltd.

04 Apr 2006 · Yashwant Varma · 2024:DHC:8028

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award interpreting the OMDA's definition of "Revenue" to exclude capital costs and other specified deductions, directing refund of excess Annual Fee paid by airport JVCs to AAI with interest.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Operation Management and Development Agreement Annual Fee Revenue definition Capital costs deduction

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-8 v. Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd.

26 Feb 2006 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:5082-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision that royalty payments made by Samsung India Electronics to its parent for technological know-how were at arm's length and not subject to transfer pricing adjustments, rejecting the Revenue's claim that the payments were to itself as a contract manufacturer.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant transfer pricing arm's length price royalty payments contract manufacturer

Mukesh Kapil v. Parag P Tripathi & Ors.

07 Feb 2006 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:6196-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld a consent decree based on a settlement agreement in a property redevelopment dispute, dismissing challenges alleging fraud and invalidity, and clarified that agreements to sell do not transfer ownership until registered sale deeds are executed.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Settlement Agreement Consent Decree Collaboration Agreement Agreement to Sell

Mukesh Kapil v. Parag P Tripathi & Ors.

07 Feb 2006 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:6198-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld a consent decree based on a settlement agreement in a property redevelopment dispute, rejecting challenges of fraud and invalidity and directing execution of sale deeds as per agreed terms.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Settlement Agreement Consent Decree Collaboration Agreement Agreement to Sell

Mukesh Kapil v. Parag P Tripathi & Ors.

07 Feb 2006 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:6197-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld a consent decree based on a settlement agreement in a property redevelopment dispute, holding that agreements to sell do not create interest in property until registered sale deeds are executed and dismissing challenges based on alleged fraud and breach.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant consent decree settlement agreement collaboration agreement agreement to sell

SI (GD) Hanumant Singh Shekhawat v. Union of India

01 Jan 2006 · S. Muralidhar; Sanjeev Narula · 2018:DHC:9011-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Delhi High Court held that CRPF Sub-Inspectors are entitled to pay fixation at Rs. 10,230 plus grade pay of Rs. 4,200 under the ACP Scheme by applying the 1.86 multiplier, directing respondents to grant consequential benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme ACP Scheme Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 pay fixation

Rani Singh v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

23 Dec 2005 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:5041-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a police officer absconding after criminal charges, ruling that family pension is not payable despite presumed death after seven years, as dismissal without enquiry was valid and pension rights forfeited.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant family pension dismissal from service absconding departmental enquiry

KTM-AG v. Honda Motorcycles and Scooter India Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

22 Dec 2005 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:8769

The Delhi High Court disposed of the trademark dispute petition as settled and directed cancellation of the "DUKE" trademark registration in accordance with the parties' Settlement Agreement.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Settlement Agreement Trademark cancellation Trade Mark Registry DUKE trademark

Mr. Chatanya Siddhartha, Advocate. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

01 Nov 2005 · JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA; 25.01.2019 SANJ... · 2019:DHC:7933-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 11

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act once possession is taken and compensation paid, dismissing stale claims of continued possession by landowners.

property petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) 2013 Act possession compensation

Ram Kawar HUF v. M/S SMC GLOBAL SECURITIES LIMITED

08 Sep 2005 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:1837

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to summon irrelevant documents under Section 91 Cr.P.C. in a Section 138 NI Act complaint, emphasizing that such power cannot be used for fishing expeditions or to delay trial.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 91 Cr.P.C. Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act summoning of documents cross-examination

Ashok Kumar v. Mona

19 Aug 2005 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:6533-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the divorce petition for cruelty and mental unsoundness due to the appellant's failure to prove specific incidents or produce medical evidence establishing incurable mental disorder.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(ia) Section 13(1)(iii) cruelty

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Ajay Bhatia

17 Aug 2005 · Anu Malhotra · 2021:DHC:3792
Cites 1 · Cited by 5

The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging execution orders on grounds of inaccurate site plan, holding that the decree's finality bars re-agitation of property identity issues in execution proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Execution of decree Site plan accuracy Section 47 CPC Order XXI Rule 97 CPC

Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. M/S Jamnalal Bajaj Foundation

25 May 2005 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:4536-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 11

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision allowing a charitable trust to claim exemption on deemed income arising from temporary donations to other charitable trusts under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 11 Income Tax Act accumulated income deemed income charitable trusts

M/S RAMA TENT HOUSE v. Sh. Inderjeet and Anr.

20 May 2005 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2021:DHC:1197

The Delhi High Court upheld Labour Court awards granting compensation to workmen retrenched by Rama Tent House, affirming the employer-employee relationship and continuous service under the Industrial Disputes Act.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant employer-employee relationship Industrial Disputes Act 1947 continuous service retrenchment

Meera Goyal v. Priti Saraf

04 May 2005 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:8640
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award awarding ₹38 crores to the buyer, holding that the seller's failure to fulfill contractual conditions novated payment obligations and that the arbitration proceedings and award were valid and not liable to be set aside.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge Agreement to Sell Compulsory Requirements