Delhi High Court

68,459 judgments

Year:

Charanjit Kaur v. Guru Harkrishan Public School

06 Mar 2013 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:57

The Delhi High Court directed the school to pay arrears and terminal benefits under the 6th and 7th CPC to the petitioner’s late husband’s estate with interest, affirming statutory entitlement and timelines for compliance.

labor petition_allowed Significant 6th Central Pay Commission 7th Central Pay Commission arrears of salary gratuity

Daljeet Kaur Bindra & Ors. v. Directorate of Education & Ors.

06 Mar 2013 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:314

The Delhi High Court directed an unaided minority school to implement 6th and 7th CPC pay revisions, release arrears with interest, and pay terminal benefits to serving and retired employees, affirming their entitlement under law and prior judgments.

labor petition_allowed Significant 6th Central Pay Commission 7th Central Pay Commission unaided minority schools pay arrears

Jasneet Kaur & Ors. v. Directorate of Education & Ors.

06 Mar 2013 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:318

The Delhi High Court directed unaided private school employees to be paid arrears and terminal benefits as per 6th and 7th CPC recommendations with interest, affirming their entitlement under law and prior judgments.

labor appeal_allowed Significant 6th Central Pay Commission 7th Central Pay Commission arrears of salary unaided private schools

Sudha Katoch v. Directorate of Education

06 Mar 2013 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:320

Delhi High Court directs unaided minority school to implement 6th and 7th CPC pay revisions, release arrears with interest, and pay terminal benefits to serving and retired employees in line with statutory and judicial mandates.

labor appeal_allowed Significant 6th Central Pay Commission 7th Central Pay Commission unaided minority schools arrears of salary

Maninder Kaur Sawhney v. Education Department & Ors.

06 Mar 2013 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:750

The Delhi High Court held that employees of unaided minority schools are entitled to salary revision and arrears as per the 7th CPC and directed payment of arrears with interest, while confirming the statutory gratuity ceiling.

labor petition_allowed Significant 7th Central Pay Commission unaided minority schools salary revision gratuity

Raghuvinder Kaur Grover v. Directorate of Education & Ors.

06 Mar 2013 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:950

The Delhi High Court directed an unaided minority school to implement 6th and 7th CPC pay revisions, release arrears and terminal benefits with interest, affirming employees' entitlement to pay parity with government schools.

labor petition_allowed Significant 6th Central Pay Commission 7th Central Pay Commission unaided minority schools pay parity

Rakesh Kumar Bhagat & Ors. v. Guru Harkishan Public School & Ors.

06 Mar 2013 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:9575

The Delhi High Court held that recognized private unaided minority schools are statutorily bound under Section 10(1) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 to implement 6th and 7th Pay Commission recommendations and pay arrears to their employees, rejecting claims of exemption based on minority status or financial constraints.

labor petition_allowed Significant Section 10(1) Delhi School Education Act 6th Pay Commission 7th Pay Commission unaided minority schools

The Coca-Cola Company & Anr v. V.B. Rao trading as M/s. Om Sri VenkataSai Enterprises

11 Feb 2013 · S. Muralidhar · 2016:DHC:8473

The Delhi High Court granted permanent and mandatory injunctions against the Defendant for infringing the Plaintiffs' registered DANUBE BOTTLE shape trademark and KINLEY label, ordering recall and destruction of infringing products and awarding costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement Trade Marks Act 1999 permanent injunction mandatory injunction

Coral Telecom Ltd v. Elcom Innovations Private Limited

01 Feb 2013 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2022:DHC:4837

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking appointment of an arbitrator, holding that no valid arbitration agreement exists between Coral Telecom and Elcom Innovations Pvt. Ltd. under the MoUs invoked.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Memorandum of Understanding Arbitration clause

Mr. Rajiv Kapoor & Mr. Srikant Sharma, Advocates. v. CEC-HCC JOINT VENTURE .....

31 Jan 2013 · JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR O R D E R 20.03.2017 · 2017:DHC:1620

The Delhi High Court upheld a majority arbitral award granting delay damages to the contractor, rejecting NHAI's challenge on procedural and substantive grounds under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge Extension of Time Contract delay

OIL INDIA LIMITED v. ESSAR OIL LIMITED

22 Jan 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:6788-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award favoring Essar Oil, holding that Oil India’s termination of the drilling contract was invalid and delay in pronouncing the award was not a ground to set it aside.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Contract termination Government clearance Blow-Out-Preventer

Florentine Estates of India Ltd & Anr. v. Lokesh Dahiya & Anr.

18 Jan 2013 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2022:DHC:4742

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of arbitrator filed by Petitioner No.1 due to lack of locus standi and non-compliance with mandatory notice requirements under the Arbitration Act, rejecting invocation of the Doctrine of Group of Companies.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 21 Doctrine of Group of Companies

Union of India and Anr v. Syed Sajid Ali

15 Jan 2013 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1246-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 35

The Court held that the effective date of suspension is the date of issuance of the order with immediate effect, and suspension extensions granted after 90 days without prior review are invalid, dismissing the Union of India's writ petition.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant suspension effective date CCS (CCA) Rules 1965 Rule 10(6) and (7) extension of suspension

Jayant Kumar Jain v. The State

03 Jan 2013 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2020:DHC:2654

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a property-related economic offence case, holding that investigation under a later FIR was impermissible due to overlap with an earlier FIR already investigated and closed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail multiple FIRs cognizable offence Section 154 CrPC

C&C Constructions Ltd. v. IL&FS Trust Company Limited & Ors.

24 Dec 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Yogesh Khanna · 2017:DHC:398-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a consent arbitration award executed by a sole arbitrator appointed by party consent, affirming effective service on group representatives and trustee's locus standi to enforce the award.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement sole arbitrator consent award service of notice

C&C Constructions Ltd. v. IL&FS Trust Company Limited & Ors.

24 Dec 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Yogesh Khanna · 2017:DHC:397-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of arbitration proceedings conducted by a sole arbitrator with consent, affirmed effective service on group representatives, recognized trustee's locus standi to enforce the award, and set aside costs imposed on the non-liable company.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement sole arbitrator service of notice locus standi

C&C Constructions Ltd. v. IL&FS Trust Company Limited & Ors.

24 Dec 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Yogesh Khanna · 2017:DHC:396-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a sole arbitrator appointment by party consent, confirmed service on promoter group heads as valid, recognized trustee's locus standi to enforce the award, and set aside costs imposed on the non-liable company.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement sole arbitrator service of notice trustee locus standi

Fateh Singh Chauhan v. Union of India

30 Nov 2012 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:706-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 23

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the petitioner was barred by res judicata from seeking second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme after earlier tribunal and court decisions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme financial upgradation promotion res judicata

Raisham Sharma v. Rekha Datta & Anr

22 Nov 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog · 2016:DHC:8392

The Delhi High Court quashed the complaint under the Domestic Violence Act against petitioners due to vague allegations while allowing proceedings to continue against the husband.

criminal appeal_dismissed Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12 quashing of complaint vague allegations

Manish Saini v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Another

08 Nov 2012 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:8452-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a police recruitment appointment based on the Screening Committee’s lawful assessment that an acquittal on benefit of doubt does not guarantee suitability for service in a disciplined force.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant acquittal honourable acquittal benefit of doubt Screening Committee