Delhi High Court
69,037 judgments
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-06 v. Nitrex Chemicals India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's ruling that payments for trademark use and expertise were revenue expenditure, ESOP funding was deductible from capital gains, and rejected revenue's challenges on commission disallowance, Section 14A, and foreign exchange loss treatment.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-06 v. Nitrex Chemicals India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's ruling that payments for trademark use and expertise were revenue expenses, ESOP Trust funding was deductible from capital gains, and disallowances under Sections 14A and on export commission were unjustified.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-06 v. Nitrex Chemicals India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld ITAT's ruling that payments for trademark use and expertise were revenue expenses, ESOP funding was deductible under Section 48, and disallowances on commissions and foreign exchange losses were unjustified, dismissing the Revenue's appeals.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-06 v. Nitrex Chemicals India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's ruling that payments for trademark use and expertise were revenue expenses, ESOP funding was deductible from capital gains, and disallowances under Sections 14A and foreign exchange losses were unjustified, dismissing the revenue's appeal.
M/S COMFORT INTECH LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
The Delhi High Court quashed the RBI's cancellation of an NBFC's registration for failure to provide a fair hearing, emphasizing the mandatory application of natural justice in administrative actions.
Pam Parmar v. Col Dewan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation and interest in a death claim where the deceased's income was from investments, awarding loss of estate and increasing amounts for love, affection, and consortium.
Aditya Birla Finance Ltd v. Vinay Kumar Mehta
Contempt petitions alleging non-compliance with payment and affidavit filing were disposed of as satisfied upon respondents' subsequent compliance.
Vibhas Arora v. Regional Passport Officer
The Delhi High Court held that the biological father's name is not legally mandatory in passport applications and directed issuance of passport without it, mandating software modification to accept such applications.
KRISHAN MURARI SHARMA & SONS v. NEW DELHI MUNCIPAL COUNCIL
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, holding that disputed questions of limitation and procedural compliance are to be decided by the arbitral tribunal.
Shikher Jain v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
R.L. Kohli v. Murti Bhagwan Jagannathji Maharaj & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding that a licensee is estopped from disputing the licensor's title and a suit for mandatory injunction is maintainable to evict the licensee after license termination.
Mala Bhagat Bali v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the delay condonation application and appeal by the respondent, upheld the validity of the 2012 Will, and granted letters of administration to the petitioner, exempting her from furnishing an administration bond as the sole beneficiary.
Hindpal Singh Jabbal & Ors v. Jasbir Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court lacks jurisdiction to try a suit below Rs. 2 crores involving cancellation of General Powers of Attorney and Sale deeds as such disputes do not qualify as commercial disputes under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Mohar Singh Meena v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction to hold a review promotion committee based solely on an affidavit, allowing the petitioner to independently challenge the NDMC's decision.
Fahad Aziz Azmi & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 323, 324, 341, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. BALCHAND
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT’s order quashing recovery of amounts from a retired employee’s dues, holding such recovery impermissible under Supreme Court precedent where suspension was revoked and charges dropped.
Sanjay Vermani v. Lt. Governor, National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years from the award date.
Devender Kumar Gupta v. Lt. Governor, National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years before the 2013 Act commenced, regardless of physical possession.
Dinesh Verma v. Mukesh Kumar & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld joint and several liability of the appellant and co-respondent to pay compensation under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923, based on unchallenged evidence of employment relationship.
M.M.L. VIJ v. UOI
The Delhi High Court upheld that the post of Section Officer in CTSA is an isolated post under the ACP scheme, entitling the petitioner only to the next higher standard pay scale, dismissing his claim for a higher financial upgradation.