Delhi High Court
69,037 judgments
Harish Arora v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Kuldip Kumar Sharma & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Azad Singh & Ors. v. The State N.C.T of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Juvalia Marketing Private Limited v. Santa Claus Couriers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the thirty-day period for appointment of an arbitrator begins from the initial arbitration notice, and appointed an arbitrator after respondents failed to do so within the stipulated time.
Shri Vivan Mehra v. Smt. Gita Kwatra
The Delhi High Court recorded a court-mediated settlement as a decree in partition and will validity suits and granted refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act.
Bhajan Singh v. Jagtar Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the civil suit for non-prosecution and default due to the plaintiff's failure to appear and file a formal withdrawal application despite expressing intent to withdraw.
Shyam Sahni v. Sarabjit Prakash
The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer of a civil suit involving the same property and parties to be heard along with a related suit to avoid conflicting decisions and expedite trial.
Union of India & Anr. v. S K Das
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of disciplinary dismissal for sexual harassment due to procedural lapses and barred fresh inquiry post-retirement beyond statutory limitation.
M/S FORECH INDIA LTD v. M/S TECPRO SYSTEMS LTD
The Delhi High Court held that winding up proceedings must be stayed under Section 22(1) of SICA during pending BIFR revival inquiry, notwithstanding the company's admission of debt or conditional payment proposals.
Sunny @ Yogesh v. The State (Govt. of NCT), Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeals of Sunny @ Yogesh and Naresh, upholding their criminal convictions based on proper appreciation of evidence and absence of procedural irregularities.
Sunny @ Yogesh v. The State (Govt. of NCT), Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the criminal appeals of Sunny @ Yogesh and Naresh against their convictions in terms of a detailed common judgment in a related case.
Imtiyaz @ Tinku v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of three appellants for robbery and related offences based on credible victim identification, corroborative medical evidence, and recovery of the crime weapon.
M/ S. K. S. S. Petron Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S. Gypsum Structural India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that disputes arising from a Letter of Intent supplementing a Work Order fall within the arbitration clause, affirming the Arbitrator's jurisdiction and dismissing the petition to set aside the award.
Rewati Prasad & Anr v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging repatriation orders, granting salary only for the period of interim protection and directing sympathetic consideration of posting representations.
Rewati Prasad & Anr v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging repatriation orders but directed payment of salary for the period of interim protection granted during the service dispute.
Abhay Jain v. Delhi State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 288, 337, and 304-A IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Rambhool Singh v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, affirming that admitted cheque signatures and dishonour create a presumption of legally enforceable debt.
Rajinder Prasad v. State of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act where the petitioner admitted the cheque signature but failed to rebut the presumption of issuance for discharge of a legally enforceable debt.
Alka & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable FIR under Sections 324, 341, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Kanta Jindal v. Rasik Gupta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking recall of the complainant under Section 311 Cr.P.C. in a cheque dishonour case, holding that the accused was given adequate opportunities and cannot prolong the trial by belated applications.