Shyam Sahni v. Sarabjit Prakash

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2016 · 2016:DHC:6288
Hima Kohli
Tr.P.(C) 12/2014
2016:DHC:6288
civil appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer of a civil suit involving the same property and parties to be heard along with a related suit to avoid conflicting decisions and expedite trial.

Full Text
Translation output
Tr.P.No.12/2014 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
TR.P.(C) 12/2014 & IA No.19569/2014
SHYAM SAHNI ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Dinesh C.Pandey, Mr.Piyush Sharma
Ms.Jyoti Pandey, Mr.Tushar Sharma, Advocates
VERSUS
SARABJIT PRAKASH & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: None for R-1 Mr.Sanjiv K.Jha and Mr.Vikash Kumar, Advocates for R-2
Mr.Jayant Tripathi & Mr.Dinesh Dahiya, Advocates for R-7 to R-9
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI O R D E R 05.09.2016
JUDGMENT

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner(plaintiff in CS(OS) No.1134/2008) praying inter alia that the records of Civil Suit No.13/2014, entitled “Sarabjit Prakash & Anr. Vs. Shyam Sahni & Ors.” pending in the court of the learned Senior Civil Judge(South-East), Saket Courts, New Delhi, be transferred to the High Court and taken up with the captioned suit.

2. Pleadings are complete.

3. Counsel for the petitioner states that the subject matter of CS(OS) No.1134/2008 and Civil Suit No.13/2014, filed by the respondent No.1 is the same, namely, premises bearing No.68, Friends Colony, New Delhi and 2016:DHC:6288 Tr.P.No.12/2014 further, the parties are also common. He adds that apart from CS(OS) No.1134/2008, the petitioner had filed Suit No.983/2013 pertaining to the very same property where most of the respondents herein have been impleaded as defendants, but in view of the Notification enhancing the pecuniary jurisdiction of the High Court to Rs.[2] crores and above, the said suit has been transferred to the court of the learned ADJ, Saket(South-East), New Delhi. He states that he shall be taking steps for seeking transfer of the aforesaid case back to the High Court.

4. A reply in opposition to the present petition has been filed by the respondents No.1 and 2, who are the contesting respondents.

5. It is an undisputed position that the subject matter of both the suits, namely, premises bearing No.68, Friends Colony, New Delhi is common and the parties are also common. It would only expedite the trial of both the cases if they are taken up by the same court as it would avoid a conflict of decision. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed. The file of Civil Suit No.13/2014, entitled “Sarabjit Prakash & Anr. Vs. Shyam Sahni & Ors.”, pending before learned Senior Civil Judge, Saket Court Complex, New Delhi is directed to be transferred to this court for being tagged along with CS(OS) No.1134/2008. The petition is disposed of, along with the pending application.

6. The file of the captioned case be listed on the same date as already fixed in CS(OS) No.1134/2008. HIMA KOHLI, J SEPTEMBER 05, 2016