Delhi High Court

69,037 judgments

Year:

Mohammad Sulaiman v. Union of India

16 Sep 2016 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2016:DHC:6549

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of an organ transplantation application between unrelated foreign nationals due to lack of established relationship and potential commercial transaction, emphasizing strict compliance with the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994 Authorisation Committee organ transplantation near relative

National Council of Educational Research & Training v. Krishan Murari Gupta

16 Sep 2016 · G.S. Sistani; I.S. Mehta · 2016:DHC:6586-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order allowing an employee appointed through direct recruitment to switch pension schemes despite prior CPF option, emphasizing fresh appointment and equality under Article 14.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant GPF Scheme CPF Scheme fresh appointment direct recruitment

Chander Prakash v. Ved Prakash

16 Sep 2016 · Manmohan J · 2016:DHC:6546

The Delhi High Court held the respondent guilty of contempt for wilfully disobeying the court's order to vacate premises and sentenced him to 30 days' civil imprisonment.

civil conviction_upheld Significant contempt of court wilful disobedience undertaking to court possession of premises

Punjab National Bank v. Malayan Banking Berhad & Ors

16 Sep 2016 · . ..i; HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE : · 2016:DHC:9200

The Delhi High Court dismissed Punjab National Bank's petition as infructuous after the District Judge had already ordered the transfer of the civil suit.

civil petition_dismissed transfer of civil suit petition infructuous District Judge jurisdiction civil procedure

Moonlight NGO v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation

16 Sep 2016 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Ashutosh Kumar · 2016:DHC:8946-DB

The Delhi High Court held that ambiguous turnover criteria in a tender can be interpreted as cumulative turnover, allowing NGOs' bids for mid-day meal supply to be reconsidered.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant expression of interest turnover requirement cumulative turnover annual turnover

Hindustan Prefab Ltd. v. Union of India

16 Sep 2016 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2016:DHC:6584

The Delhi High Court held that statutory post-award interest under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is payable when the arbitral award is silent on such interest, despite rejection of contractual interest claims.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitral award enforcement post-award interest Section 31(7)(b) Arbitration and Conciliation Act pre-award interest

Saurabh Sharma v. State

16 Sep 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:6542

The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to the accused in a dowry harassment case due to non-cooperation with investigation and pending recovery of istridhan articles.

criminal petition_dismissed anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. dowry harassment Section 498-A IPC

Pareena Estate v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation

16 Sep 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:6535

The Delhi High Court held that municipal permissions for outdoor advertising are valid only for one year corresponding to advertisement tax payment, and while unauthorized advertisements can be removed without notice, violations of valid permissions require reasonable notice before removal.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant No Objection Certificate Outdoor Advertising Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 Advertisement Tax

TRF Ltd. v. Energo Engineering Projects Ltd

16 Sep 2016 · Manmohan Singh · 2016:DHC:6548

The Delhi High Court held that unconditional bank guarantees can only be restrained from encashment on grounds of egregious fraud or irretrievable harm, dismissing the petitioner's injunction applications and upholding the respondent's contractual rights.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Bank Guarantee Unconditional and Irrevocable Egregious Fraud Irretrievable Harm

Novex Communication Private Limited v. Hotel Crowne Plaza

16 Sep 2016 · Hima Kohli · 2016:DHC:6547

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a civil suit following an out of court settlement and directed refund of 50% court fees under Section 16-A of the Court Fees Act.

civil appeal_allowed out of court settlement withdrawal of suit court fees refund Section 16-A Court Fees Act

CASCADE ENTERPRISES v. PUREARTH INFRASTRUCTURE LTD & ANR

16 Sep 2016 · V. KAMESWAR RAO · 2016:DHC:8355

The Delhi High Court issued procedural directions for expeditious disposal of arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 without deciding the merits.

arbitration other Procedural Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 arbitral award setting aside

Pankaj Sharma v. The State (NCI of Delhi)

15 Sep 2016 · Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:9037

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC amicable settlement

Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi v. Rajwinder Kaur

15 Sep 2016 · G. S. Sistani; I. S. Mehta · 2016:DHC:8787-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order directing compassionate appointment to the deceased employee’s daughter, recognizing the family’s indigent condition despite delay, while clarifying the order is an exception and not a precedent.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant compassionate appointment Central Administrative Tribunal indigent family delay in claim

M/S Bombay Mercantile Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Mohd Abad Alvi & Ors

15 Sep 2016 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2016:DHC:8510

The Delhi High Court allowed the decree holder to withdraw execution petitions after the award was satisfied and dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.

civil appeal_dismissed execution petition decree holder award satisfaction withdrawal of petition

Rajit Mehra v. State NCT of Delhi

15 Sep 2016 · Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:8351

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to accused in a cheque dishonour and criminal conspiracy case, imposing conditions to ensure cooperation with investigation and prevent absconding.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail dishonoured cheques Section 420 IPC Section 120-B IPC

Mohan Lal v. Union Public Service Commission

15 Sep 2016 · G. S. Sistani; I. S. Mehta · 2016:DHC:6500-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging UPSC's selection of a candidate, holding that the selection process and experience evaluation were lawful and the petitioner’s claims of forgery and procedural irregularity were unsubstantiated.

administrative appeal_dismissed UPSC recruitment age relaxation experience criteria forgery allegations

National Highways Authority of India v. M/S Gayatri – ECI (JV)

15 Sep 2016 · Vibhu Bahru · 2016:DHC:6481
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing NHAI to reimburse additional VAT costs to contractor, holding no evidence showed VAT increase was factored into contract price adjustments.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Contract price adjustment Value Added Tax (VAT)

Shri Chand Yadav v. Manoj Kumar & Anr.

15 Sep 2016 · S.P. Garg · 2016:DHC:6480

The High Court allowed the appeal against dismissal of a Section 138 NI Act complaint for non-prosecution where the complainant was absent due to illness but represented by proxy counsel, holding such dismissal a miscarriage of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act non-prosecution dismissal proxy counsel representation absence due to illness

Anil Kumar @ Mithu & Ors. v. State

15 Sep 2016 · Gita Mittal; R.K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:6478-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentences of three appellants for the murder of Ravi Kant, affirming the reliability of ocular and medical evidence despite the first informant turning hostile.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder Section 302 IPC Section 324 IPC Section 34 IPC

Janak Kumari Sood v. Delhi Development Authority

15 Sep 2016 · Manmohan · 2016:DHC:6471

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging denial of housing allotment as barred by delay and laches, holding that repeated representations do not extend limitation under Article 226.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant delay and laches writ petition Article 226 limitation