Delhi High Court
69,037 judgments
Anil Kumar v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a suspension order based on oral approval subsequently confirmed in writing and dismissed the writ petition challenging the suspension and related orders.
M/S CAPTAIN GUMAN SINGH & SONS v. M/S INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file a writ petition under Article 226, holding that the arbitral award's finding on termination would not bar constitutional remedy.
Delhi University Contract Employees’ Union v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing the University of Delhi to formulate a scheme for regularization of long-serving contract Junior Assistants appointed against sanctioned posts, applying the principles in Uma Devi while rejecting the University’s reliance on UGC ban and doctrine of election.
Dr. Smt. Esidira Yog v. Dr. Dinesh Kumar Yog
The Delhi High Court dismissed two appeals for non-prosecution, thereby affirming the divorce decree granted on grounds of cruelty and desertion and dismissal of restitution petition under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Farahimran v. State
Anticipatory bail granted to accused in sexual offence case where investigation revealed contradictions and evidence suggesting falsity of allegations.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. V.D. Chawla
The Delhi High Court upheld the refund of property tax with interest granted by the Municipal Taxation Tribunal, clarifying that while the Tribunal cannot grant interest without statutory authority, the Writ Court may do so in equity to prevent unjust enrichment.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. V.D. Chawla
The Delhi High Court upheld the refund of property tax with interest at 12% per annum to the assessee, clarifying that while the Tribunal cannot grant interest without statutory authority, the Writ Court may do so to prevent unjust enrichment.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Ghanshyam Dass Seth
The Delhi High Court held that while the Municipal Taxation Tribunal cannot grant interest on refunded property tax without statutory authority, the Writ Court may exercise discretion to grant interest to prevent unjust enrichment, and directions to issue notices must comply with statutory provisions.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Ghanshyam Dass Seth
The Delhi High Court held that while the Municipal Taxation Tribunal cannot grant interest on property tax refunds, the Court may exercise discretion to award interest to prevent unjust enrichment, and directions to issue notices must comply with statutory provisions.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Ghanshyam Dass Seth
The Delhi High Court held that while the Municipal Taxation Tribunal cannot grant interest on property tax refunds without statutory authority, a Writ Court may grant such interest to prevent unjust enrichment, and modified the direction on issuance of statutory notices accordingly.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Ghanshyam Dass Seth through Lrs
The Delhi High Court held that while the Municipal Taxation Tribunal cannot grant interest on tax refunds, the Writ Court may do so in equity to prevent unjust enrichment, and modified directions regarding statutory notices accordingly.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Ghanshyam Dass Seth
The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of interest on property tax refund on equitable grounds despite absence of statutory provision, while setting aside the Tribunal's order granting interest and modifying directions on issuance of notices.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Ghanshyam Dass Seth
The Delhi High Court upheld the refund of property tax with interest granted by the Municipal Taxation Tribunal, clarifying that while the Tribunal cannot grant interest without statutory authority, the Court may exercise discretion to prevent unjust enrichment.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Ghanshyam Dass Seth
The Delhi High Court held that while the Municipal Taxation Tribunal cannot grant interest on refunded property tax, the Writ Court may exercise discretion to award interest to prevent unjust enrichment and ensure justice.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. V.D. Chawla
The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of interest on a property tax refund in exercise of its discretionary power while setting aside the Tribunal's order granting interest, and modified directions on issuance of notices to be in accordance with law.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Ghanshyam Dass Seth
The Delhi High Court held that while the Municipal Taxation Tribunal cannot grant interest on refunded property tax without statutory authority, the Writ Court may exercise discretion to award interest to prevent unjust enrichment, upholding refund with 12% interest to the assessee.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. V.D. Chawla
The Delhi High Court held that while the Municipal Taxation Tribunal cannot grant interest on refunded property tax without statutory authority, the Writ Court may exercise discretion to grant interest to prevent unjust enrichment, and modified directions regarding issuance of notices accordingly.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. V.D. Chawla
The Delhi High Court held that while the Municipal Taxation Tribunal cannot grant interest on tax refunds without statutory authority, the Court may exercise discretion to grant interest to prevent unjust enrichment and ordered refund of tax with interest accordingly.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. V.D. Chawla
The Delhi High Court held that while no statutory provision mandates interest on refunded property tax under the DMC Act, equitable grounds justify interest to prevent unjust enrichment, modifying the Tribunal's order accordingly.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. V.D. Chawla
The Delhi High Court upheld the refund of property tax with interest at 12% per annum granted in writ jurisdiction to prevent unjust enrichment despite absence of statutory provision for interest under the DMC Act.