Delhi High Court
69,037 judgments
Food Corporation of India v. M/S Padda Trading Company
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award rejecting FCI's major claim but set aside the award allowing PTC's counter-claim barred by limitation, clarifying the scope of interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION NETWORK LTD AND ANR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR
The Delhi High Court quashed an ex-parte order declining renewal of TV channel permissions due to lack of proof of service of the show cause notice and directed fresh adjudication after giving the petitioners an opportunity to respond.
Aarushi Mahajan v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
The Delhi High Court upheld cancellation of provisional MBA admission due to non-submission of qualifying exam results by the prescribed deadline, affirming strict adherence to university admission rules.
Sh. Madanjit Kumar v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that government circulars on posting of employees with disabled children are only guidelines and not binding on public sector enterprises unless adopted by their Board of Directors, dismissing the petition challenging the transfer of an employee with a disabled child.
RAM CHANDER YADAV v. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
The Delhi High Court held that tehbazari rights are personal and non-transferable except to legal heirs and directed the municipal authority to decide the petitioner's pending complaint with due process.
Ami Lal & Ors. v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside convictions under Sections 498A and 302 IPC due to unreliable and inconsistent dying declarations unsupported by corroborative evidence.
Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd v. Ircon International Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that serving employees of Northern Railway are disqualified as arbitrators under the amended Arbitration Act, but former employees are not automatically disqualified absent a present business relationship.
Anandita Puri v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging cancellation of provisional MBA admission due to non-submission of qualifying exam results by the prescribed deadline, upholding the university's admission rules.
Ms. Sija Nair Pal v. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking reinstatement and damages, holding that the petitioner employed through a private agency cannot claim regularization or relief under Article 226 without meeting the criteria established in Umadevi’s case.
Directorate of Revenue Intelligence v. Amit Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that under the NDPS Act, 1985, a vehicle used for transporting psychotropic substances like Ketamine Hydrochloride cannot be released on superdari pending trial, setting aside the lower court's release order.
State (NCT) of Delhi v. Manoj Kumar @ Lala & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's leave petition challenging acquittal in a dowry death case, holding that mere unnatural death within seven years of marriage does not attract presumption under Section 113B Evidence Act without proof of cruelty or dowry demand.
Raj Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of possession claims.
Manoj Kumar v. Pinki Rani
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion where the respondent's allegations of dowry harassment and adultery were unproven and withdrawal from consortium was without cause.
Prem Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of possession disputes.
Delhi Development Authority v. Prem Chand Sharma & Co
The Court held that interest on a refund order runs only on amounts not refunded within the prescribed period, exempting part payments made timely from interest liability.
Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax-8 v. M/s Super Malls Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the AO's satisfaction under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act was valid and set aside the ITAT's quashing of the notice, remanding the matter for fresh hearing.
Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax-8 v. M/s Super Malls Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the satisfaction note under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act was validly recorded and set aside the ITAT's decision invalidating the assessment on a hyper-technical ground, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax-8 v. M/s Super Malls Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the Assessing Officer's satisfaction note under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act was valid despite ITAT's contrary finding, allowing the appeal and remanding the matter for fresh hearing on merits.
Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax-8 v. M/s Super Malls Pvt. Ltd.
Delhi High Court held that the Assessing Officer's satisfaction note under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act must be read practically, setting aside the ITAT's invalidation and remanding the matter for fresh hearing.
KRISHNA SAINI & ORS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of physical possession.